Optimizing Satellite Servicing in High Altitudes
This study examines efficient servicing depot placement for satellites in medium Earth orbit.
― 5 min read
Table of Contents
In recent years, the idea of servicing satellites while they are in space has gained more and more attention from both private companies and government organizations. This technology, known as on-orbit servicing, assembly, and manufacturing (OSAM), aims to extend the lifespan of satellites, reduce costs, and promote more sustainable practices in space. This study specifically looks into how to best position servicing depots for satellite constellations located in high altitudes, like Medium Earth Orbit (MEO).
The Need for On-Orbit Servicing
Satellites are essential for various services, such as communication, navigation, and weather monitoring. However, once a satellite is launched into space, it can face several issues like hardware failures or the need for upgrades that can render it less efficient or even non-functional. Historically, repairing or upgrading a satellite in space has been challenging and expensive. OSAM provides a way to address this by allowing for repairs, upgrades, and even assembly of new satellites directly in their operational environment.
This technology has already been demonstrated through initiatives like the Robotic Servicing of Geosynchronous Satellites (RSGS) and NASA's OSAM-1 mission. Both aim to improve satellite longevity and reduce the need for costly replacements.
Understanding High-Altitude Orbits
High-altitude orbits, such as MEO, have unique characteristics that make them suitable for satellite constellations. These orbits are stable and allow for a wide coverage area. The satellites in such orbits can interact with servicer spacecraft that travel between the servicing depots and the satellites needing maintenance. However, maneuvering between different orbital planes can be complex and requires careful planning.
The proposed study focuses on creating an efficient system to identify optimal locations for these servicing depots. This involves mathematical problem-solving approaches, specifically a variant of the Facility Location Problem (FLP). The main goal is to optimize the placement of these depots to minimize Operational Costs.
Key Concepts in Servicing Architecture
In designing a servicing architecture, several factors come into play:
Facility Location: This refers to the positioning of servicing depots in orbit. Each depot must be able to reach client satellites effectively while minimizing costs.
Operational Costs: The costs involved in launching the depot, maintaining it, and conducting servicing trips to satellites are crucial elements in decision-making.
Effective Mass to Low Earth Orbit (EMLEO): This metric helps evaluate the total cost of launching and maintaining a depot in terms of mass, which is a standard measure in the space industry.
Low-Thrust Propulsion Systems: Most servicing missions will use low-thrust propulsion, which can provide the necessary adjustments to a satellite's orbit with minimal fuel usage.
A New Formulation for Facility Location
The study proposes a new way of looking at the Facility Location Problem, tailoring it specifically for on-orbit servicing needs. The new model, called the Orbital Facility Location Problem (OFLP), allows one to:
- Identify the best number of servicing depots needed for a specific satellite constellation.
- Determine the best positions for these depots.
- Allocate which satellites will be serviced by which depots.
One of the main modifications in the OFLP compared to the traditional FLP is the inclusion of costs associated with the servicing process and the operational dynamics of satellites in high-altitude orbits.
Gathering Data for Analysis
To achieve an effective solution, the study uses data from existing satellite constellations, specifically the GPS and Galileo systems. Both constellations operate in MEO and have several satellites spread across multiple orbital planes.
The challenges lie in the ability to service these satellites efficiently without incurring high costs. For this reason, the researchers had to look at factors such as the trajectory of the servicing spacecraft, the necessary thrust adjustments, and the overall operational costs.
Methodology: How It Works
To explore the best configuration of servicing depots, the following steps were taken:
Identifying Candidate Locations: Several potential orbital slots where depots could be stationed are identified. The choice of these locations considers various orbital parameters, including semimajor axis and inclination.
Cost Assessment: The weight of the costs involved in launching and operating these depots is evaluated. The costs include the fuel needed to make servicing trips to satellites, as well as the establishment costs for each depot.
Optimization Process: Using mathematical programming techniques, researchers can simulate various scenarios to see which combinations of depot placements and servicing allocations yield the lowest total costs.
Results and Findings
The results show that the optimal number and location of servicing depots significantly depend on the demand for servicing trips, the mass of the servicer spacecraft, and the mass of the depot itself.
Facility Alignment: The depots tend to cluster close to groups of satellites that need servicing.
Trade-Offs: A careful trade-off is essential between the launch costs of placing the depot in orbit and the operational costs associated with servicing the satellites.
Variability in Solutions: Different configurations yielded various optimal results, highlighting that there is no one-size-fits-all solution.
Continuous Refinement of Solutions
After determining the initial placements and allocations, the research emphasizes the importance of refining these locations. This step uses advanced algorithms to enhance the placement of facilities further, ensuring that they are as efficient as possible.
This refinement is crucial as it allows adjustments based on real-time data and conditions, ensuring effective servicing without unnecessary delays or costs.
Conclusion: The Path Forward
On-orbit servicing is set to play an essential role in the future of space operations. By optimizing the placement of servicing depots for satellite constellations, we can drastically improve the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of satellite maintenance. As technology advances further, the methods of OSAM can help ensure that satellites remain functional longer, reducing the need for new launches and promoting sustainability in space activities.
As the field of space exploration and satellite servicing grows, further research and development will be critical for enhancing these techniques. The insights gained here lay the foundation for future advancements in the area of on-orbit servicing, allowing for a more sustainable and efficient use of space resources.
Title: Orbital Facility Location Problem for Satellite Constellation Servicing Depots
Abstract: This work proposes an adaptation of the Facility Location Problem for the optimal placement of on-orbit servicing depots for satellite constellations in high-altitude orbit. The high-altitude regime, such as Medium Earth Orbit (MEO), is a unique dynamical environment where existing low-thrust propulsion systems can provide the necessary thrust to conduct plane-change maneuvers between the various orbital planes of the constellation. As such, on-orbit servicing architectures involving servicer spacecraft that conduct round-trips between servicing depots and the client satellites of the constellation may be conceived. To this end, orbital facility location problem is a binary linear program, where the costs of operating and allocating the facility(ies) to satellites are considered in terms of the sum of Equivalent Mass to Low Earth Orbit (EMLEO), is proposed. The low-thrust transfers between the facilities and the clients are computed using a parallel implementation of a Lyapunov feedback controller. The total launch cost of the depot along with its servicers, propellant, and payload are taken into account as the cost to establish a given depot. The proposed approach is applied to designing on-orbit servicing depots for the Galileo and the GPS constellations.
Authors: Yuri Shimane, Nick Gollins, Koki Ho
Last Update: 2024-03-28 00:00:00
Language: English
Source URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.12191
Source PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2302.12191
Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.
Thank you to arxiv for use of its open access interoperability.
Reference Links
- https://ctan.org/pkg/mathtools
- https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/16-522-space-propulsion-spring-2015/7f725e54b9be201164d56ebbd5e08023_MIT16_522S15_Lecture6.pdf
- https://ttu-ir.tdl.org/bitstream/handle/2346/74082/ICES_2018_81.pdf
- https://www.arianespace.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Mua-6_Issue-2_Revision-0_March-2021.pdf
- https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/atoms/files/sls_lift_capabilities_and_configurations_508_08202018_0.pdf