Simple Science

Cutting edge science explained simply

# Computer Science# Robotics# Computers and Society

Addressing Musculoskeletal Disorders with Collaborative Robots

Learn how cobots can improve workplace safety and reduce MSD risks.

― 6 min read


Robots in the WorkplaceRobots in the Workplacemusculoskeletal issues.Exploring cobots to fight
Table of Contents

Musculoskeletal Disorders, often called MSDs, are common health issues in the workplace. These disorders affect the muscles, joints, ligaments, tendons, and nerves. They can lead to pain, discomfort, and reduced ability to work. In fact, MSDs are one of the leading causes of work-related disability across the globe.

Causes of Musculoskeletal Disorders

Several factors contribute to the development of MSDs in the workplace. These factors can be divided into three main categories:

  1. Physical Factors: This includes activities like repetitive movements, lifting heavy objects, and awkward postures. For example, if someone has to bend or twist their body in uncomfortable ways for long periods, they might develop back pain or joint issues.

  2. Organizational Factors: The way work is organized can also contribute to MSDs. This includes the pace of work, job responsibilities, and the support or collaboration among workers. An unorganized system can force employees to rush, leading to injuries.

  3. Psychosocial Factors: These include the mental and emotional aspects of work. Stress, job satisfaction, and relationships with coworkers or management play a significant role in how workers perceive their jobs. High stress and low job satisfaction can increase the risk of developing MSDs.

Importance of Addressing MSDs in the Workplace

MSDs are not just a health issue for employees. They also come with high costs for companies. When workers suffer from these disorders, it leads to absenteeism, decreased productivity, and increased healthcare costs. Therefore, it is essential to identify and address the risk factors that contribute to these disorders.

The Role of Collaborative Robots

To help reduce the risk of MSDs, companies have started looking into the use of collaborative robots, or cobots. Cobots work alongside human operators to assist with tasks, particularly those that are physically demanding. The hope is that these robots will reduce the physical strain on workers and create a safer working environment.

How Cobots Work

Cobots are designed to collaborate with humans in a shared workspace. Unlike traditional robots, which operate independently, cobots can adjust their actions based on the operator's movements. They can be programmed for various tasks, from lifting heavy materials to performing assembly work.

Benefits of Using Cobots

  1. Reducing Physical Strain: Cobots can take on the more physically demanding tasks, allowing workers to focus on lighter, less strenuous responsibilities.

  2. Improving Productivity: By working together, humans and cobots can accomplish tasks more efficiently. This collaboration can lead to faster production times and improved overall output.

  3. Enhancing Worker Satisfaction: With cobots handling the more challenging tasks, workers may experience less fatigue and stress. This balance can lead to higher job satisfaction and a better workplace atmosphere.

  4. Promoting Safety: Cobots can help minimize the risk of accidents and injuries by assisting workers in carrying out tasks safely. For instance, when lifting heavy objects, the cobot can securely carry the load, reducing the chance of injury.

Assessing the Risks Before Introducing Cobots

Before introducing cobots into the workplace, it is crucial to assess the existing MSD risk factors. This assessment typically involves experts observing work processes and talking with employees about their experiences.

The Assessment Process

  1. Video Observations: Observers can film different workstations to see how tasks are performed. This allows experts to analyze the workers' movements and identify any risk factors.

  2. Expert Evaluations: Specialists in ergonomics evaluate the collected data. They assess the work environment, physical demands, and the psychological well-being of workers.

  3. Self-Confrontation Interviews: Workers are shown videos of their tasks and asked to provide feedback. This interview process allows workers to discuss their physical and mental challenges in their roles.

Key Findings from Assessments

The assessments often reveal that both physical and psychosocial factors contribute significantly to MSD risks. Common issues reported by workers include:

  • Poor Posture: Many workers find themselves in uncomfortable positions for extended periods.
  • Mental Workload: The stress of keeping up with fast-paced work can lead to mental fatigue.
  • Monotony: Repetitive tasks can be draining, leading to a sense of boredom and low job satisfaction.

The Differences in Perspectives

Interestingly, the views of experts and operators can differ. While experts focus on the physical aspects of work, operators may prioritize mental and emotional factors. For example, an expert may identify heavy lifting as a significant risk, while a worker may feel that the mental stress of the job is more burdensome.

The Value of Operators’ Experiences

To effectively introduce cobots, it is essential to consider the operators' experiences and perceptions. Understanding what tasks workers would prefer to delegate to a robot can help in designing the right systems to support them.

Task Delegation Preferences

During assessments, operators were asked which tasks they would prefer to assign to a cobot. Their responses typically fall into three categories:

  1. Physical Tasks: Many operators expressed a desire for cobots to handle heavy lifting or repetitive movements. This would reduce their physical strain and allow them to focus on more meaningful aspects of their jobs.

  2. Mental Workload: Some operators preferred to have cobots assist with tasks requiring concentration, such as quality inspection. They felt that having assistance would allow them to focus more on ensuring products meet quality standards.

  3. Collaborative Efforts: Operators also mentioned the importance of teamwork and mutual assistance with their coworkers. They recognized that cobots could change the dynamics of their work, and this aspect needed careful consideration.

Designing Effective Human-Cobot Collaboration

For cobots to be successful in the workplace, the design must account for how workers think and feel about their jobs. Here are some key considerations:

  1. Meaningful Work: Cobots should not take over all tasks that workers find fulfilling. Instead, they should help with the more arduous tasks while allowing humans to maintain roles that bring them satisfaction.

  2. Flexibility: Cobots should be able to adapt to the varying needs of different operators. Each worker may have different preferences and perceptions of which tasks are more demanding.

  3. Supportive Interaction: The design of the cobots should facilitate a collaborative environment. Workers should feel that the robots are there to support them, not replace them.

Training and Implementation

Implementing cobots requires training for workers to adapt to new systems and processes. Additionally, organizations should consider how these changes impact employees’ career paths and skill development.

Importance of Training

Training programs must address how to effectively work alongside cobots. Workers need to understand the capabilities of the robots and how to communicate or collaborate with them effectively.

Conclusion

Musculoskeletal disorders are significant health concerns in the workplace, affecting both employees and organizations. The introduction of collaborative robots presents an opportunity to reduce physical strain on workers, enhance productivity, and create a safer working environment.

However, for cobots to achieve their desired impact, it is vital to carefully assess the existing risk factors and incorporate the insights and preferences of the workers. By prioritizing meaningful work and providing proper training, companies can create a harmonious collaboration between humans and robots, ensuring a safer, healthier, and more productive workplace for everyone.

Original Source

Title: Assessing MSDs before Introduction of a Cobot: Psychosocial Aspects and Employee's Subjective Experience

Abstract: Musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) are one of the main causes of work disability (EU-OSHA, 2019; WHO, 2019). Several solutions, including the cobotic system (EUROGIP, 2017), have been put forward to improve unhealthy working conditions and prevent MSDs. We sought to identify the MSD risk factors of workers on a screen-printed glass production line prior to introduction of a cobot. We used a mixed data collection technique: video observations and assessment of MSD risk factors by expert ergonomists, and then self-confrontation interviews with six production-line operators and subjective perception of risk factors. The two types of assessment (by experts and by operators) showed that the most demanding risk factors were physical (e.g., work posture) and psychosocial (e.g., mental workload). Certain risk factors were viewed differently by the experts and the operators. One question remains: How can a cobot make work more meaningful for operators?

Authors: Emma Cippelletti, Soufian Azouaghe, Damien Pellier, Aurélie Landry

Last Update: 2023-07-13 00:00:00

Language: English

Source URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.09583

Source PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2307.09583

Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.

Thank you to arxiv for use of its open access interoperability.

Reference Links

More from authors

Similar Articles