Simple Science

Cutting edge science explained simply

# Computer Science# Robotics

Addressing Safety Risks in Robot Operations with Sharp Tools

Research focuses on reducing injuries from sharp tools in human-robot collaborations.

― 3 min read


Safety in Robot Tool UseSafety in Robot Tool Usetools in robot environments.Research tackles injuries from sharp
Table of Contents

The use of robots in tasks that involve sharp or pointed tools presents unique challenges. When robots and humans work closely together, there is a risk of injury, especially when dealing with pointed objects like screwdrivers or scissors. This article discusses the research aimed at ensuring safety in these situations by developing guidelines and methods to assess risks.

Understanding the Risks

One major concern is the potential for Injuries caused by impacts from sharp tools. While safety standards exist for dull objects, the same cannot be said for pointed ones. More research is needed to understand the severity of injuries that pointed tools can cause. This knowledge is crucial for robot designers and manufacturers who want to integrate these tools safely into their systems.

The Need for Data

To better assess and manage risks associated with sharp tools, it's important to gather data on injuries. This research uses animal substitutes, like pig claws and chicken drumsticks, to study potential injuries similar to those that could occur in humans. By conducting drop tests, researchers can simulate impacts and collect data on how these tools could harm human hands.

Testing Methods

The testing involves dropping weighted objects onto the animal substitutes to observe the effects. The researchers document the types of injuries sustained, which can include cuts, bruises, and fractures. Different weights and speeds are used to see how these factors influence the severity of injuries. The goal is to build a comprehensive database that can help assess the risks associated with specific tools and tasks.

Injury Assessment

The findings from the tests reveal varying types of injuries depending on the shape of the tool and the force of the impact. For instance, sharp edges tend to cause deeper cuts than rounded ones. The researchers aim to classify injuries based on their severity, providing a clearer understanding of what to expect when humans work alongside robots using pointed or sharp tools.

Practical Applications

The insights gained from this research can be applied in real-world scenarios. For example, industries that rely on robots for assembly work can use this data to create safer work environments. By knowing the thresholds for injuries, engineers can redesign robotic movements and settings, ensuring that the risks are minimized.

Importance of Collaboration

For this research to be truly effective, collaboration among various institutions is essential. Medical professionals, roboticists, and engineers need to work together to establish a more extensive database that covers a wide range of injury scenarios. By pooling resources and knowledge, a more comprehensive understanding of potential injuries can be achieved.

Future Developments

Going forward, the research will expand beyond animal surrogates to include human testing. This step is necessary to validate the findings and ensure that the data truly reflects human anatomy and responses. By taking this approach, the ultimate goal of creating a safer environment for human-robot interaction can be reached.

Conclusion

In conclusion, as robotics technology continues to advance, it is critical to address safety concerns associated with sharp tools. By gathering data on injuries, understanding the risks involved, and collaborating across disciplines, we can develop effective strategies to minimize harm. This research is an important step towards achieving safer human-robot interactions in various industries, ultimately allowing for more flexible and efficient automation.

Original Source

Title: Towards Safe Robot Use with Edged or Pointed Objects: A Surrogate Study Assembling a Human Hand Injury Protection Database

Abstract: The use of pointed or edged tools or objects is one of the most challenging aspects of today's application of physical human-robot interaction (pHRI). One reason for this is that the severity of harm caused by such edged or pointed impactors is less well studied than for blunt impactors. Consequently, the standards specify well-reasoned force and pressure thresholds for blunt impactors and advise avoiding any edges and corners in contacts. Nevertheless, pointed or edged impactor geometries cannot be completely ruled out in real pHRI applications. For example, to allow edged or pointed tools such as screwdrivers near human operators, the knowledge of injury severity needs to be extended so that robot integrators can perform well-reasoned, time-efficient risk assessments. In this paper, we provide the initial datasets on injury prevention for the human hand based on drop tests with surrogates for the human hand, namely pig claws and chicken drumsticks. We then demonstrate the ease and efficiency of robot use using the dataset for contact on two examples. Finally, our experiments provide a set of injuries that may also be expected for human subjects under certain robot mass-velocity constellations in collisions. To extend this work, testing on human samples and a collaborative effort from research institutes worldwide is needed to create a comprehensive human injury avoidance database for any pHRI scenario and thus for safe pHRI applications including edged and pointed geometries.

Authors: Robin Jeanne Kirschner, Carina M. Micheler, Yangcan Zhou, Sebastian Siegner, Mazin Hamad, Claudio Glowalla, Jan Neumann, Nader Rajaei, Rainer Burgkart, Sami Haddadin

Last Update: 2024-08-31 00:00:00

Language: English

Source URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.04004

Source PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2404.04004

Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.

Thank you to arxiv for use of its open access interoperability.

More from authors

Similar Articles