Simple Science

Cutting edge science explained simply

# Biology# Animal Behavior and Cognition

Neuronal Activity in Motivation and Reward

A study on how specific neurons influence motivation during food-seeking behavior.

― 8 min read


Neurons and MotivationNeurons and MotivationUncovereddrive motivation during reward-seeking.New insights into how brain neurons
Table of Contents

Understanding how animals behave when seeking rewards is essential in studying Motivation. Researchers often use experiments with rodents to learn how their brains work during these tasks. One area of focus is the paraventricular thalamus (PVT), which plays a significant role in motivating behavior, particularly in how it responds to needs like hunger. There are different types of neurons in the PVT, and each type may respond differently when animals are searching for food.

This article explores how specific neurons in the PVT affect goal-directed actions. We will look closely at two main groups of neurons: those that express dopamine D2 receptors (PVTD2(+)) and those that do not (PVTD2(−)). By examining these neurons in rodents during a foraging task, we hope to learn more about their roles in motivating behavior.

Foraging Task Overview

To study how these neurons behave, researchers set up a task where rodents had to navigate a long corridor to find food. The mice started by entering a "trigger zone," where they saw a signal indicating that food was available. Once they saw the signal, they had to move quickly to the "reward zone" to get their food. Successful completion of this task involved various actions, such as learning the best way to move to the reward zone and how to retrieve the food quickly.

During these experiments, researchers recorded how often the mice completed trials and how quickly they reached the reward zone over time. They noticed that the mice improved their speed and engagement in the task, suggesting they were motivated to find food.

Neuronal Dynamics During Food-Seeking Behavior

As the mice engaged in their food-seeking behavior, scientists monitored the activity of PVTD2(+) neurons. They injected a calcium sensor into these neurons to track their activity levels while the mice performed the foraging task. They found that these neurons remained inactive when the cue signaled food availability but became more active as the mice approached the reward zone and when they consumed the food.

The researchers also noted that in control mice, which did not have the calcium sensor, there was no change in the recorded activity. This outcome supported the idea that the activity of PVTD2(+) neurons is associated with reward-seeking and food consumption.

Neuronal Activity Analysis by Trial Speed

The scientists also wanted to see how these neurons responded to different levels of motivation. They divided the trials based on how quickly the mice reached the reward zone, categorizing them into "fast" and "slow" trials. They found that during fast trials, the activity of PVTD2(+) neurons increased significantly compared to slow trials. However, despite these variations, when they measured the overall activity during these trials, they did not find differences based on speed.

In summary, the PVTD2(+) neurons showed increased activity when the mice were motivated and moving quickly towards the food, highlighting their role in encoding motivation.

Effects of Satiety on Neuronal Activity

To further explore how motivation levels impacted PVTD2(+) neurons, researchers sorted trials based on when they occurred during the testing session. They believed that mice would start feeling less hungry as they progressed through the session. To test this, they compared activity levels in the early trials to later ones, noticing that PVTD2(+) activity was higher in the first trials. However, they found no significant differences in activity when they compared early and late trials in terms of the slope of their responses.

These findings suggested that PVTD2(+) neuron activity varied with hunger levels, with higher activity noted when the mice were more hungry.

Neuronal Dynamics of PVTD2(−) Neurons

Next, researchers examined the activity of PVTD2(−) neurons to see if they behaved differently from PVTD2(+) neurons during food-seeking tasks. They recorded the activity of these neurons in trained mice performing the same reward task. The researchers found that PVTD2(−) neurons showed a decrease in activity during the approach and delivery of the reward, which contrasted with the behavior of PVTD2(+) neurons.

When grouped by trial speed, PVTD2(−) neurons displayed consistent activity levels regardless of how fast the mice approached the reward. The lack of correlation suggested that these neurons might not be responding to motivation-related factors in the same way.

Differences Between Neuronal Populations

To further illustrate the differences between these two neuronal populations, researchers looked at how PVTD2(−) neurons responded to the state of hunger. Again, when they compared early trials to later ones, they did not find any significant changes in activity based on the satiety level of the mice.

Interestingly, researchers also observed the activity of PVTD2(−) neurons in the anterior segment of the PVT. They noted that these neurons behaved similarly to the PVTD2(−) neurons in the posterior segment. This finding suggested that both groups might share similar functional properties, further clarifying the differences between their roles in motivated behavior.

Trial Termination and Neuronal Activity

The researchers also explored what happened when the trial ended. They defined trial termination as when the mice finished eating and started to return to the trigger zone. During this phase, they found that the activity of PVTD2(+) neurons decreased, while the activity of PVTD2(−) neurons increased significantly. This suggested a clear functional role for each neuron type, with PVTD2(+) neurons involved in initiating food-seeking behaviors and PVTD2(−) neurons playing a role in signaling the end of these actions.

Despite measuring the animals’ returns to the trigger zone, both types of neurons did not show any significant activity changes based on how fast the mice returned. This was particularly true for PVTD2(−) neurons, which indicated that their activity was not influenced by the speed of the return.

Linking Neuronal Activity to NAc Projections

As many PVT neurons project to the Nucleus Accumbens (NAc), which is critical for motivated behaviors, researchers focused on the activity dynamics of these projections. They found that the output from PVTD2(+) neurons to the NAc mirrored their own activity and was associated with motivation. This showed that these projections were active during the approach and delivery of rewards and reflected the urgency of the task.

Conversely, PVTD2(−) projections to the NAc showed reduced activity, aligning with their role in signaling the end of motivated behaviors. Interestingly, while both types of projections displayed similar activity dynamics, it appeared that PVTD2(+) neurons were more attuned to motivational variables, whereas PVTD2(−) neurons did not display variation in terms of trial order.

Neural Circuitry and Feedback Mechanisms

The relationship between these two types of neurons suggests that they might work together to facilitate goal-oriented actions. While PVTD2(+) neurons may promote engagement in searching for rewards, PVTD2(−) neurons could provide a feedback mechanism to cease such behavior once the goal is achieved. This coordination may be crucial for maintaining balance in motivated actions.

Some research indicates that there is little direct communication between PVTD2(+) and PVTD2(−) neurons, suggesting that other parts of the brain might influence their activities. One such possible structure is the thalamic reticular nucleus (TRN), which may regulate interactions between various thalamic groups, including those involved in motivation.

Implications for Understanding Motivation

The findings discussed highlight crucial aspects of how motivation operates within the brain. By identifying specific neuron types associated with different phases of reward-seeking behavior, this research opens avenues for understanding how motivation works in various conditions. For instance, disruptions in these processes may contribute to problems seen in mental health, such as depression, where motivation levels can fluctuate significantly.

Moreover, an understanding of these circuits may provide insight into potential therapeutic targets for enhancing motivation in individuals suffering from disorders characterized by reduced motivation, such as addiction or eating disorders.

Future Directions

While this study adds valuable information regarding the roles of PVTD2(+) and PVTD2(−) neurons, it also suggests the existence of other neuron types within the PVT that could contribute to motivated behaviors. Future research could explore these additional populations, as well as how they interact within broader neural circuits.

Additionally, examining the influence of external factors, such as the time of day or environmental cues, may help clarify how motivation is shaped. A comprehensive understanding of these elements could lead to a more holistic view of how the brain manages goal-related actions.

Conclusion

In summary, the study of the motivational aspects of behavior in rodents reveals complex interactions between different types of neurons. By focusing on PVTD2(+) and PVTD2(−) neurons in the PVT and their projections to the NAc, researchers gain insights into how the brain processes motivation. Such knowledge not only enriches our understanding of animal behavior but also presents opportunities for addressing challenges in mental health, paving the way for the development of targeted interventions to improve motivation in those in need.

Original Source

Title: Dissociable encoding of motivated behavior by parallel thalamo-striatal projections

Abstract: The successful pursuit of goals requires the coordinated execution and termination of actions that lead to positive outcomes. This process is thought to rely on motivational states that are guided by internal drivers, such as hunger or fear. However, the mechanisms by which the brain tracks motivational states to shape instrumental actions are not fully understood. The paraventricular nucleus of the thalamus (PVT) is a midline thalamic nucleus that shapes motivated behaviors via its projections to the nucleus accumbens (NAc)1-8 and monitors internal state via interoceptive inputs from the hypothalamus and brainstem3,9-14. Recent studies indicate that the PVT can be subdivided into two major neuronal subpopulations, namely PVTD2(+) and PVTD2(-), which differ in genetic identity, functionality, and anatomical connectivity to other brain regions, including the NAc4,15,16. In this study, we used fiber photometry to investigate the in vivo dynamics of these two distinct PVT neuronal types in mice performing a reward foraging-like behavioral task. We discovered that PVTD2(+) and PVTD2(-) neurons encode the execution and termination of goal-oriented actions, respectively. Furthermore, activity in the PVTD2(+) neuronal population mirrored motivation parameters such as vigor and satiety. Similarly, PVTD2(-) neurons, also mirrored some of these parameters but to a much lesser extent. Importantly, these features were largely preserved when activity in PVT projections to the NAc was selectively assessed. Collectively, our results highlight the existence of two parallel thalamo-striatal projections that participate in the dynamic regulation of goal pursuits and provide insight into the mechanisms by which the brain tracks motivational states to shape instrumental actions.

Authors: Sofia Beas, I. Khan, C. Gao, G. Loewinger, E. Macdonald, A. Bashford, S. Rodriguez-Gonzalez, F. Pereira, M. Penzo

Last Update: 2024-01-21 00:00:00

Language: English

Source URL: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.07.07.548113

Source PDF: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.07.07.548113.full.pdf

Licence: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.

Thank you to biorxiv for use of its open access interoperability.

More from authors

Similar Articles