Simple Science

Cutting edge science explained simply

# Computer Science# Robotics

Bridging the Gap: Robots in Education

Interactive robots can help draw diverse students to robotics and STEM fields.

― 6 min read


Robots Boost Diversity inRobots Boost Diversity inSTEMstudents to technology fields.Using robots can attract diverse
Table of Contents

There is a noticeable lack of diversity in fields like engineering, technology, and computing at universities. Certain groups, such as women and ethnic minorities, are underrepresented. This gap leads to issues like pay differences based on gender and ethnicity, along with social disadvantages. To tackle this problem, we are looking at how Interactive Robots can attract students from various backgrounds to consider studying Robotics.

The Importance of Diversity in Higher Education

Diversity in higher education is crucial. When there is a mix of people in technical fields, it can lead to better job environments and more innovation. However, many students drop out of these courses. In the UK, dropout rates are similar for both genders in computer science, but in places like Germany, more women leave Stem courses. This shows that we need to address the root causes of dropout rates and interest in these subjects early on.

Stereotypes and Interest

One reason for the lack of diversity in these fields is the stereotypes surrounding technical subjects. Research shows that girls often have less interest in these areas because of these stereotypes. Boys and girls see science and engineering through different lenses, which affects their choices. By changing how these subjects are presented, we can encourage more girls to join.

How Interactive Robots Can Help

Interactive robots could play a big role in increasing interest in computing subjects. These robots can attract attention and serve as marketing tools. They have been shown to engage students effectively in different educational settings. Robots are designed by people and can be adapted to cater to diverse needs, making them inclusive. Efforts are also being made to ensure that robots are designed with inclusion in mind.

Research and Outreach Activities

To understand how interactive robots can be used to draw students into robotics, we will look at successful examples in education. We will also analyze outreach events at a university to see how they meet inclusion goals. Based on this, we will suggest activities for universities to use interactive robots more effectively during events aimed at attracting students.

Benefits of Interactive Robots in Education

Research indicates that using interactive robots in classrooms can enhance the learning experience. They stimulate interest and make learning more engaging. Additionally, robots provide hands-on experiences that can improve the understanding of the subject matter. This makes them valuable at events where schools aim to introduce students to STEM fields.

Educational robotics can introduce creativity and a sense of play in learning. These robots can blend various areas of knowledge, creating a more enjoyable and applicable learning experience. This multi-faceted approach can help reach a wider audience with different learning styles and backgrounds.

Case Studies of Successful Outreach

We will share examples of two outreach events where robotics researchers engaged students. At these events, researchers showcased several robots, including Kaspar and Pepper, allowing visitors to interact and learn about their functions. Feedback from these events was overwhelmingly positive, indicating that people enjoyed the opportunities to engage with the robots.

In one event, the researchers were part of a hackathon that displayed various fun and educational activities. The second event was a large fair aimed at inspiring students to explore STEM subjects. Notably, these robots attracted attention and encouraged interactions among visitors, helping to create an engaging atmosphere.

Team Diversity

A key aspect of these events was assembling a diverse team of researchers. Having a varied group of presenters allowed attendees to see role models from different backgrounds. This is important for students who might be hesitant to pursue careers in technology due to stereotypes. The presence of diverse presenters underscores the idea that robotics is for everyone, regardless of gender or ethnicity.

The Kaspar robot aims to assist children with autism and language therapy. It is designed to help break social isolation by facilitating interactions. The Pepper robot, on the other hand, is more geared towards attracting attention in various settings. Its gender-neutral design allows visitors to interpret and interact with it in ways that feel comfortable to them.

Engagement at Events

Both robots were able to foster conversations and connections among participants. Visitors often noticed the robots from a distance and gathered around to watch them perform tasks like dancing or storytelling. These performances created a lively environment that kept attendees entertained and engaged.

During the events, discussions were not just limited to interactions with the robots. Many students were inspired to ask questions about robotics and research, while parents also expressed curiosity about the field. This curiosity demonstrates the need for outreach to a broad audience, not just students.

Key Recommendations for Outreach

Based on these outreach events, several recommendations can be made for other institutions:

  1. Visibility: Using interactive robots can significantly grab the attention of visitors.
  2. Relatability: It is essential to represent a diverse team of exhibitors who can discuss various topics, making it easier for visitors to see themselves in these fields.

These two points highlight the importance of creating an engaging and inclusive atmosphere at outreach events.

Limitations and Future Research

While these events showed success, there are limitations that should be addressed in future studies. For example, there is no clear measurement of the effectiveness of using robots compared to traditional methods. A more systematic approach is needed to evaluate their impact.

Additionally, the current study doesn’t cover all underrepresented groups in STEM. There is also a lack of insight into how including individuals with disabilities could enhance inclusivity. Research in these areas could provide a broader understanding of how to appeal to various groups.

Conclusion

In conclusion, using interactive robots in outreach activities can significantly engage and inspire potential students to consider careers in computing. By bringing together diverse teams and employing robots effectively, universities can foster an inclusive atmosphere that encourages curiosity and reduces stereotypes. These strategies are essential for attracting more students from different backgrounds into STEM fields, ultimately enhancing diversity in higher education. Future research should focus on evaluating the measurable success of these approaches and expanding the understanding of inclusivity in robotics education.

Original Source

Title: Interactive robots as inclusive tools to increase diversity in higher education

Abstract: There is a major lack of diversity in engineering, technology, and computing subjects in higher education. The resulting underrepresentation of some population groups contributes largely to gender and ethnicity pay gaps and social disadvantages. We aim to increase the diversity among students in such subjects by investigating the use of interactive robots as a tool that can get prospective students from different backgrounds interested in robotics as their field of study. For that, we will survey existing solutions that have proven to be successful in engaging underrepresented groups with technical subjects in educational settings. Moreover, we examine two recent outreach events at the University of Hertfordshire against inclusivity criteria. Based on that, we suggest specific activities for higher education institutions that follow an inclusive approach using interactive robots to attract prospective students at open days and other outreach events. Our suggestions provide tangible actions that can be easily implemented by higher education institutions to make technical subjects more appealing to everyone and thereby tackle inequalities in student uptake.

Authors: Patrick Holthaus

Last Update: 2023-03-02 00:00:00

Language: English

Source URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.01316

Source PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2303.01316

Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.

Thank you to arxiv for use of its open access interoperability.

More from author

Similar Articles