Simple Science

Cutting edge science explained simply

# Biology# Neuroscience

Understanding Short-Term Memory in Animals

This article explores how short-term memory works and its limitations in animals.

― 5 min read


Memory Workings inMemory Workings inAnimalserrors in animal studies.Examining short-term memory and its
Table of Contents

Short-term memory (STM) is our brain's ability to hold onto information for short periods, which is vital for tasks like planning, thinking, understanding language, and making decisions. However, this ability has its limits. First, STM can only store a small amount of information at once, and second, the information can fade quickly. Factors like distractions or the passage of time can further complicate our ability to remember things shortly after learning them.

As we explore the reasons behind these limitations, it's important to note that issues with STM are linked to various brain disorders, making our understanding even more essential.

Research on Memory in Animals

Scientists have conducted many studies on how memory works in animals, particularly in monkeys and rodents. These studies have shown that certain neurons in the brain maintain activity to keep track of information during short delays between learning and recalling that information. This activity can be seen as a sort of "holding pattern" for memory. However, some research indicates that during certain tasks, this memory activity can behave in unexpected ways that don't fit neatly within the traditional memory models.

For instance, when testing animals on their memory for specific tasks, scientists have observed that the activity of neurons can fluctuate and lead to errors in memory recall. These errors can happen due to various reasons, such as the length of the task or disruptions in attention.

Examining Errors in Memory

Mistakes in memory or recall have been a major focus for researchers. They have noted that during tasks requiring memory, the persistent activity of neurons tends to decrease or disappear when errors occur. At the same time, some findings show that mistakes can still happen despite the brain showing signs of memory activity. Understanding why these errors occur and how they relate to memory is complicated, as there are many different reasons for forgetting, such as problems in how memory is stored, kept, or accessed.

In addition, lapses in attention and other unrelated errors can confuse the picture of what goes wrong during memory tasks. Researchers are interested in figuring out the exact reasons behind these errors, as they have essential implications for how the brain functions in both healthy and disordered states.

Investigating Memory Errors in Mice

To gain a better understanding of STM errors, researchers have conducted experiments with mice. In these studies, mice had to remember which side a sound came from after a short delay. The researchers found that as the delay increased, the accuracy of the mice's responses decreased, indicating memory loss over time. Interestingly, they also noticed that even when the mice made mistakes, they tended to repeat their previous choices, regardless of whether those choices were correct.

By breaking down the types of errors the mice made, the researchers aimed to isolate and study memory errors more closely. They developed models to help explain the differences between when the mice used STM correctly and when they appeared to disengage from the task, leading to repetitions of prior actions.

Behavior Patterns in Memory Tasks

When analyzing the mice's behavior, scientists found that animals often switch between two distinct states during memory tasks: one where they are actively using memory and another where they tend to repeat previous actions without using memory. This switching behavior can be observed through the way the mice respond throughout the course of a task.

During the active memory state, it appears that the brain is engaged and able to maintain the memory for a short period, whereas in the disengaged state, the memory activity reduces significantly. Researchers hypothesized that the brain's engagement level plays a critical role in how well the memory is maintained.

Understanding Neuronal Activity

Researchers also took a close look at the activity of neurons in the brain's anterior lateral motor cortex (ALM) during these tasks. They discovered that the patterns of activity differed significantly between the engaged state and the disengaged state. During engaged trials, neuronal activity showed a clear correlation with the memory of the upcoming response, but during disengaged trials, that activity was much less organized and often failed to represent the necessary information accurately.

These findings suggest that there are distinct mechanisms at play when an animal is properly engaged in a task versus when it is not. The differences in neural activity and how they correspond to memory performance highlight the importance of engagement in the memory process.

Synchrony in Brain Activity

Another aspect that researchers investigated was the synchrony of neural activity during different phases of the task. They found that the degree to which neurons fired together tended to vary based on the overall mental state of the animals. When the animals were in the memory-maintaining state, neuronal activity was generally lower and less synchronized. In contrast, during lapses, where the animals disengaged from the task, the activity became more synchronized, suggesting that different cognitive states can alter how neurons in the brain interact with one another.

The increased synchrony seen during lapses suggests a different underlying process in the brain when animals are not actively using memory. The data imply that lapses could indicate a shift in cognitive control, revealing more about how the brain manages its resources during tasks.

Conclusion: Bridging Memory and Cognitive Control

In conclusion, the ability to maintain Short-term Memories relies heavily on cognitive control and the brain's engagement in a task. The patterns of behavior observed in mice during memory tasks provide valuable insights into how memory can falter and how lapses may result from a withdrawal from effortful cognitive processes.

Such studies not only deepen our understanding of how memory functions but also shed light on potential mechanisms behind memory-related disorders in humans. By exploring the balance between engaged and disengaged states, researchers aim to develop better strategies for understanding and addressing memory issues.

Original Source

Title: Episodic recruitment of attractor dynamics in frontal cortex reveals distinct mechanisms for forgetting and lack of cognitive control in short-term memory

Abstract: Short-term memory (STM) is prone to failure, especially during prolonged memory maintenance or under limited cognitive control. Despite predictive mechanistic frameworks based on persistent neural activity and attractor states, a direct assessment of network dynamics during multifactorial STM failure is still missing. We addressed this in a delayed-response task where mice maintained a prospective response during a long variable delay. Mice behavior episodically switched between a task-engaged state described by an attractor model, and a task-disengaged state purely determined by previous choices. During task engagement, the anterolateral motor cortex (ALM) showed delay persistent activity stably encoding correct choices, whereas the encoding reversed during the delay in error trials. In contrast, in task-disengaged phases ALM showed no clear traces of attractor dynamics and instead exhibited enhanced synchrony at [~] 4-5Hz. Thus, ALM switches between distinct error-generating dynamics: in control-capable trials, transitions between memory attractors cause forgetting errors, whereas non-memory errors are caused by the dissociation of ALM during the mnemonic period reflecting the lack of cognitive control.

Authors: Tiffany Ona-Jodar, G. Prat-Ortega, C. Li, J. Dalmau, A. Compte, J. de la Rocha

Last Update: 2024-02-21 00:00:00

Language: English

Source URL: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.02.18.579447

Source PDF: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.02.18.579447.full.pdf

Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.

Thank you to biorxiv for use of its open access interoperability.

More from authors

Similar Articles