New Insights into Meson Production in Particle Collisions
Research reveals limits on charm quark particle production in high-energy collisions.
― 5 min read
Table of Contents
This article presents new findings from a research project focusing on particle physics, specifically studying high-energy Collisions of particles known as electron-positron pairs. These collisions happen at various energies, which allows scientists to investigate the behavior of different particles produced during these events.
Background
The study of particle collisions is essential for understanding the fundamental building blocks of matter. Scientists use large detectors to observe the results of these collisions, capturing data that helps them identify the various particles created during the process. The particles of interest in this research include Mesons, particularly those containing Charm Quarks.
The Experiment
In this experiment, data was collected from collisions at 33 different energy levels between 3.7730 GeV and 4.7008 GeV. A total of 22.7 inverse femtobarns of data were accumulated. The main objective was to measure the cross sections of specific processes that result in the production of certain mesons.
Key Findings
The findings indicate that there is no evidence for the production of resonant states through specific channels that were previously expected. This means that the particles of interest did not show up in the way researchers anticipated. However, upper limits were established for the rates of these processes, providing valuable information for future studies.
Particle Identification
To accurately identify the particles produced in the collisions, researchers implemented several techniques. One critical aspect involved tracking how charged particles moved through the detector. The time taken for these particles to travel certain distances was measured, allowing scientists to assign identities to the various particles based on their behavior.
In addition to tracking, a method known as particle identification (PID) was used. This process combined data from different parts of the detector to assign probabilities to each particle type. By focusing on the particles that most likely matched the expected results, researchers could filter out background noise in the data.
Data Analysis
Analysis of the collected data was performed through detailed statistical methods. Researchers fit experimental results to expected patterns for different particle states. This fitting process helped to reveal the number of signal events and allowed for the measurement of key parameters, such as the cross sections of the processes being studied.
The research involved both signal and background events. Signal events correspond to the desired particle processes, while background events stem from other unrelated reactions that could interfere with the results. The analysis aimed to isolate the signal events to provide clear measurements of the processes of interest.
Monte Carlo Simulations
To enhance the analysis, Monte Carlo simulations were employed. These simulations allowed researchers to create hypothetical scenarios of particle collisions and the resulting data. By comparing real data to these simulations, scientists could determine the efficiency of their particle selection techniques and identify potential sources of background interference.
The simulations included various processes, helping to model how the detector responds to different types of collisions. Researchers generated a large number of simulated events, which were then used to refine the analysis of actual collision data.
Efficiency and Corrections
To ensure accurate measurements, researchers calculated the efficiency of their event selection methods. This efficiency was determined by comparing the number of detected events to the total number of particles expected from simulations. By evaluating this ratio, researchers could correct their findings to account for any losses in signal detection.
Furthermore, systematic uncertainties were considered throughout the study. These uncertainties can arise from various factors, including variations in measurement techniques and the inherent limitations of the detectors. By identifying and quantifying these uncertainties, researchers aimed to improve the overall precision of their results.
Resonant Contributions
Part of the study involved seeking evidence for resonant contributions to the observed processes. This means that researchers were on the lookout for specific types of particles that might appear as a result of intermediate states in the collision. To test this, researchers performed different fits to their data, incorporating both resonant and non-resonant contributions in their models.
Despite thorough testing, no significant evidence for these resonant contributions was found. This finding is meaningful, as it suggests that the processes occurring in the studied energy range do not favor the creation of specific resonant states that would typically be expected.
Conclusion
This research has provided new insights into the physics of meson production during high-energy particle collisions. The results show that while certain expectations were not met regarding resonant states, the established upper limits on production rates contribute to the ongoing effort to understand the behavior of charm quarks.
The methodologies used, including advanced particle tracking, statistical fitting, and Monte Carlo simulations, have demonstrated their effectiveness in analyzing complex data from particle collisions. Future research will build on these findings, further investigating the properties of mesons and their interactions.
By continually refining techniques and expanding the range of measurements, scientists aim to uncover more about the fundamental structure of matter and the forces that govern the universe.
Title: Cross section measurements of $e^+e^- \to \Phi K^+ K^-$ and $e^+ e^- \to \Phi K_S^0 K_S^0$ at center-of-mass energies between 3.7730 GeV and 4.7008 GeV
Abstract: Based on 22.7 fb$^{-1}$ of $e^+e^-$ annihilation data collected at 33 different center-of-mass energies between 3.7730 GeV and 4.7008 GeV with the BESIII detector at the BEPCII collider, Born cross sections of the two processes $e^+e^-\to \phi K^+ K^-$ and $e^+ e^- \to \phi K_{S}^{0} K_{S}^{0}$ are measured for the first time. No indication of resonant production through an intermediate vector state $V$ is observed, and the upper limits on the product of the electronic width $\Gamma_{e^+e^-}$ and the branching fraction $Br(V\rightarrow \phi K \bar{K})$ of the processes $e^+e^- \to V \to \phi K^+ K^-$ and $e^+e^- \to V \to \phi K_S^0K_S^0$ at the $90\%$ confidence level are obtained for a large parameter space in resonance masses and widths. For the current world average mass and width of the $\psi(4230)$ of $m=4.2187$ GeV$/c^2$ and $\Gamma=44$ MeV, we set upper limits on the $\phi K^+ K^-$ and $\phi K_S^0K_S^0$ final states of 1.75 eV and 0.47 eV at the $90\%$ confidence level, respectively.
Authors: BESIII Collaboration, M. Ablikim, M. N. Achasov, P. Adlarson, X. C. Ai, R. Aliberti, A. Amoroso, M. R. An, Q. An, Y. Bai, O. Bakina, I. Balossino, Y. Ban, V. Batozskaya, K. Begzsuren, N. Berger, M. Berlowski, M. Bertani, D. Bettoni, F. Bianchi, E. Bianco, J. Bloms, A. Bortone, I. Boyko, R. A. Briere, A. Brueggemann, H. Cai, X. Cai, A. Calcaterra, G. F. Cao, N. Cao, S. A. Cetin, J. F. Chang, T. T. Chang, W. L. Chang, G. R. Che, G. Chelkov, C. Chen, Chao Chen, G. Chen, H. S. Chen, M. L. Chen, S. J. Chen, S. M. Chen, T. Chen, X. R. Chen, X. T. Chen, Y. B. Chen, Y. Q. Chen, Z. J. Chen, W. S. Cheng, S. K. Choi, X. Chu, G. Cibinetto, S. C. Coen, F. Cossio, J. J. Cui, H. L. Dai, J. P. Dai, A. Dbeyssi, R. E. de Boer, D. Dedovich, Z. Y. Deng, A. Denig, I. Denysenko, M. Destefanis, F. De Mori, B. Ding, X. X. Ding, Y. Ding, J. Dong, L. Y. Dong, M. Y. Dong, X. Dong, S. X. Du, Z. H. Duan, P. Egorov, Y. H. Y. Fan, Y. L. Fan, J. Fang, S. S. Fang, W. X. Fang, Y. Fang, R. Farinelli, L. Fava, F. Feldbauer, G. Felici, C. Q. Feng, J. H. Feng, K Fischer, M. Fritsch, C. Fritzsch, C. D. Fu, J. L. Fu, Y. W. Fu, H. Gao, Y. N. Gao, Yang Gao, S. Garbolino, I. Garzia, P. T. Ge, Z. W. Ge, C. Geng, E. M. Gersabeck, A Gilman, K. Goetzen, L. Gong, W. X. Gong, W. Gradl, S. Gramigna, M. Greco, M. H. Gu, Y. T. Gu, C. Y Guan, Z. L. Guan, A. Q. Guo, L. B. Guo, M. J. Guo, R. P. Guo, Y. P. Guo, A. Guskov, T. T. Han, W. Y. Han, X. Q. Hao, F. A. Harris, K. K. He, K. L. He, F. H. H. Heinsius, C. H. Heinz, Y. K. Heng, C. Herold, T. Holtmann, P. C. Hong, G. Y. Hou, X. T. Hou, Y. R. Hou, Z. L. Hou, H. M. Hu, J. F. Hu, T. Hu, Y. Hu, G. S. Huang, K. X. Huang, L. Q. Huang, X. T. Huang, Y. P. Huang, T. Hussain, N Hüsken, W. Imoehl, J. Jackson, S. Jaeger, S. Janchiv, J. H. Jeong, Q. Ji, Q. P. Ji, X. B. Ji, X. L. Ji, Y. Y. Ji, X. Q. Jia, Z. K. Jia, P. C. Jiang, S. S. Jiang, T. J. Jiang, X. S. Jiang, Y. Jiang, J. B. Jiao, Z. Jiao, S. Jin, Y. Jin, M. Q. Jing, T. Johansson, X. K., S. Kabana, N. Kalantar-Nayestanaki, X. L. Kang, X. S. Kang, R. Kappert, M. Kavatsyuk, B. C. Ke, A. Khoukaz, R. Kiuchi, R. Kliemt, O. B. Kolcu, B. Kopf, M. Kuessner, A. Kupsc, W. Kühn, J. J. Lane, P. Larin, A. Lavania, L. Lavezzi, T. T. Lei, Z. H. Lei, H. Leithoff, M. Lellmann, T. Lenz, C. Li, C. H. Li, Cheng Li, D. M. Li, F. Li, G. Li, H. Li, H. B. Li, H. J. Li, H. N. Li, Hui Li, J. R. Li, J. S. Li, J. W. Li, K. L. Li, Ke Li, L. J Li, L. K. Li, Lei Li, M. H. Li, P. R. Li, Q. X. Li, S. X. Li, T. Li, W. D. Li, W. G. Li, X. H. Li, X. L. Li, Xiaoyu Li, Y. G. Li, Z. J. Li, Z. X. Li, C. Liang, H. Liang, Y. F. Liang, Y. T. Liang, G. R. Liao, L. Z. Liao, J. Libby, A. Limphirat, D. X. Lin, T. Lin, B. J. Liu, B. X. Liu, C. Liu, C. X. Liu, F. H. Liu, Fang Liu, Feng Liu, G. M. Liu, H. Liu, H. B. Liu, H. M. Liu, Huanhuan Liu, Huihui Liu, J. B. Liu, J. L. Liu, J. Y. Liu, K. Liu, K. Y. Liu, Ke Liu, L. Liu, L. C. Liu, Lu Liu, M. H. Liu, P. L. Liu, Q. Liu, S. B. Liu, T. Liu, W. K. Liu, W. M. Liu, X. Liu, Y. Liu, Y. B. Liu, Z. A. Liu, Z. Q. Liu, X. C. Lou, F. X. Lu, H. J. Lu, J. G. Lu, X. L. Lu, Y. Lu, Y. P. Lu, Z. H. Lu, C. L. Luo, M. X. Luo, T. Luo, X. L. Luo, X. R. Lyu, Y. F. Lyu, F. C. Ma, H. L. Ma, J. L. Ma, L. L. Ma, M. M. Ma, Q. M. Ma, R. Q. Ma, R. T. Ma, X. Y. Ma, Y. Ma, Y. M. Ma, F. E. Maas, M. Maggiora, S. Malde, Q. A. Malik, A. Mangoni, Y. J. Mao, Z. P. Mao, S. Marcello, Z. X. Meng, J. G. Messchendorp, G. Mezzadri, H. Miao, T. J. Min, R. E. Mitchell, X. H. Mo, N. Yu. Muchnoi, J. Muskalla, Y. Nefedov, F. Nerling, I. B. Nikolaev, Z. Ning, S. Nisar, Y. Niu, S. L. Olsen, Q. Ouyang, S. Pacetti, X. Pan, Y. Pan, A. Pathak, P. Patteri, Y. P. Pei, M. Pelizaeus, H. P. Peng, K. Peters, J. L. Ping, R. G. Ping, S. Plura, S. Pogodin, V. Prasad, F. Z. Qi, H. Qi, H. R. Qi, M. Qi, T. Y. Qi, S. Qian, W. B. Qian, C. F. Qiao, J. J. Qin, L. Q. Qin, X. P. Qin, X. S. Qin, Z. H. Qin, J. F. Qiu, S. Q. Qu, C. F. Redmer, K. J. Ren, A. Rivetti, V. Rodin, M. Rolo, G. Rong, Ch. Rosner, S. N. Ruan, N. Salone, A. Sarantsev, Y. Schelhaas, K. Schoenning, M. Scodeggio, K. Y. Shan, W. Shan, X. Y. Shan, J. F. Shangguan, L. G. Shao, M. Shao, C. P. Shen, H. F. Shen, W. H. Shen, X. Y. Shen, B. A. Shi, H. C. Shi, J. L. Shi, J. Y. Shi, Q. Q. Shi, R. S. Shi, X. Shi, J. J. Song, T. Z. Song, W. M. Song, Y. J. Song, Y. X. Song, S. Sosio, S. Spataro, F. Stieler, Y. J. Su, G. B. Sun, G. X. Sun, H. Sun, H. K. Sun, J. F. Sun, K. Sun, L. Sun, S. S. Sun, T. Sun, W. Y. Sun, Y. Sun, Y. J. Sun, Y. Z. Sun, Z. T. Sun, Y. X. Tan, C. J. Tang, G. Y. Tang, J. Tang, Y. A. Tang, L. Y Tao, Q. T. Tao, M. Tat, J. X. Teng, V. Thoren, W. H. Tian, Y. Tian, Z. F. Tian, I. Uman, S. J. Wang, B. Wang, B. L. Wang, Bo Wang, C. W. Wang, D. Y. Wang, F. Wang, H. J. Wang, H. P. Wang, J. P. Wang, K. Wang, L. L. Wang, M. Wang, Meng Wang, S. Wang, T. Wang, T. J. Wang, W. Wang, W. P. Wang, X. Wang, X. F. Wang, X. J. Wang, X. L. Wang, Y. Wang, Y. D. Wang, Y. F. Wang, Y. H. Wang, Y. N. Wang, Y. Q. Wang, Yaqian Wang, Yi Wang, Z. Wang, Z. L. Wang, Z. Y. Wang, Ziyi Wang, D. Wei, D. H. Wei, F. Weidner, S. P. Wen, C. W. Wenzel, U. Wiedner, G. Wilkinson, M. Wolke, L. Wollenberg, C. Wu, J. F. Wu, L. H. Wu, L. J. Wu, X. Wu, X. H. Wu, Y. Wu, Y. J. Wu, Z. Wu, L. Xia, X. M. Xian, T. Xiang, D. Xiao, G. Y. Xiao, S. Y. Xiao, Y. L. Xiao, Z. J. Xiao, C. Xie, X. H. Xie, Y. Xie, Y. G. Xie, Y. H. Xie, Z. P. Xie, T. Y. Xing, C. F. Xu, C. J. Xu, G. F. Xu, H. Y. Xu, Q. J. Xu, Q. N. Xu, W. Xu, W. L. Xu, X. P. Xu, Y. C. Xu, Z. P. Xu, Z. S. Xu, F. Yan, L. Yan, W. B. Yan, W. C. Yan, X. Q. Yan, H. J. Yang, H. L. Yang, H. X. Yang, Tao Yang, Y. Yang, Y. F. Yang, Y. X. Yang, Yifan Yang, Z. W. Yang, Z. P. Yao, M. Ye, M. H. Ye, J. H. Yin, Z. Y. You, B. X. Yu, C. X. Yu, G. Yu, J. S. Yu, T. Yu, X. D. Yu, C. Z. Yuan, L. Yuan, S. C. Yuan, X. Q. Yuan, Y. Yuan, Z. Y. Yuan, C. X. Yue, A. A. Zafar, F. R. Zeng, X. Zeng, Y. Zeng, Y. J. Zeng, X. Y. Zhai, Y. C. Zhai, Y. H. Zhan, A. Q. Zhang, B. L. Zhang, B. X. Zhang, D. H. Zhang, G. Y. Zhang, H. Zhang, H. H. Zhang, H. Q. Zhang, H. Y. Zhang, J. Zhang, J. J. Zhang, J. L. Zhang, J. Q. Zhang, J. W. Zhang, J. X. Zhang, J. Y. Zhang, J. Z. Zhang, Jianyu Zhang, Jiawei Zhang, L. M. Zhang, L. Q. Zhang, Lei Zhang, P. Zhang, Q. Y. Zhang, Shuihan Zhang, Shulei Zhang, X. D. Zhang, X. M. Zhang, X. Y. Zhang, Xuyan Zhang, Y. Zhang, Y. T. Zhang, Y. H. Zhang, Yan Zhang, Yao Zhang, Z. H. Zhang, Z. L. Zhang, Z. Y. Zhang, G. Zhao, J. Zhao, J. Y. Zhao, J. Z. Zhao, Lei Zhao, Ling Zhao, M. G. Zhao, S. J. Zhao, Y. B. Zhao, Y. X. Zhao, Z. G. Zhao, A. Zhemchugov, B. Zheng, J. P. Zheng, W. J. Zheng, Y. H. Zheng, B. Zhong, X. Zhong, H. Zhou, L. P. Zhou, X. Zhou, X. K. Zhou, X. R. Zhou, X. Y. Zhou, Y. Z. Zhou, J. Zhu, K. Zhu, K. J. Zhu, L. Zhu, L. X. Zhu, S. H. Zhu, S. Q. Zhu, T. J. Zhu, W. J. Zhu, Y. C. Zhu, Z. A. Zhu, J. H. Zou
Last Update: 2023-04-16 00:00:00
Language: English
Source URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.07783
Source PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2304.07783
Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.
Thank you to arxiv for use of its open access interoperability.