Energy-Efficient Framework for Remote Monitoring Systems
A new framework boosts energy efficiency in smart technology networks.
― 6 min read
Table of Contents
In today's world, smart technology is becoming more common in industries. Remote monitoring systems help manage safety and health by analyzing different environments. For example, in industrial settings with many devices, there is a need to handle resources efficiently. This means looking at things like computing power, network usage, and the energy used by devices.
One approach to handle these challenges is through a method called Hierarchical Federated Learning (HFL). This method allows different layers of devices to share the workload, sending tasks to nearby computing units. This paper discusses a new energy-efficient HFL framework that uses Wireless Energy Transfer (WET) technology, designed for networks that include various types of devices (known as heterogeneous networks or HetNets).
Background
Remote Monitoring Systems
Remote monitoring systems are crucial for keeping track of different environments, especially in industrial settings. These systems help with ensuring workplace safety, monitoring environmental conditions, and keeping track of workers' health. With the rise of the Internet of Things (IoT), there are now many smart devices available, but they require a lot of resources to operate effectively.
Federated Learning
Federated Learning (FL) is a decentralized approach where multiple devices cooperate to train a shared model using local data. Unlike traditional methods where data is sent to a central server for processing, FL allows each device to keep its data private. Each device trains its model locally and only sends the updated model weights back to a central unit for combining them into a single model.
FL is beneficial because it addresses privacy concerns and reduces the amount of data transferred, which helps with bandwidth efficiency. However, as the number of devices increases, challenges arise, such as communication delays and energy usage.
Hierarchical Federated Learning
To tackle the issues presented by numerous devices, the Hierarchical Federated Learning (HFL) model comes into play. HFL offloads tasks to nearby edge computing units, which are closer to the devices. This setup not only helps with energy efficiency but also improves response times. The distinct feature of HFL is its ability to manage diverse data distributions effectively.
In this setup, devices send their local updates to local edge units, which then process the updates before sending them to the central unit for final aggregation. This method can significantly speed up the learning process while maintaining data privacy.
The Challenge of Energy Consumption
One major concern when deploying FL systems is energy consumption. Devices connected to these networks have limited energy resources, making it essential to find ways to minimize energy use. WET technology is promising because it allows energy to be transferred wirelessly. This technology can support devices that may need frequent charging without needing physical connections.
Proposed Framework
The proposed framework introduces a new way to carry out HFL over HetNets using WET. The aim is to reduce energy costs while ensuring efficient learning. By formulating our energy strategy as a mathematical problem, we can optimize how devices connect to energy sources and manage the energy they use.
The framework considers several key aspects:
- Device Association: Deciding which device connects to which edge unit.
- Energy Management: Efficiently using energy sources to power devices.
- Device Scheduling: Managing which devices are active or inactive to reduce unnecessary energy use.
Energy-Efficient Hierarchical Federated Learning Framework
This section will explore how the proposed framework functions. The core idea is to create an environment that efficiently utilizes energy while performing learning tasks.
Device Connection: Each device is associated with an edge unit based on factors like energy needs and connection quality. This approach ensures that each device gets the optimal amount of energy and support.
Energy Transfer: Energy is sent from edge units to devices wirelessly. Each edge unit can send energy based on the requirements of the devices connected to it.
Dynamic Scheduling: Not all devices need to be active at all times. By scheduling when devices are active, we can conserve energy and still maintain learning performance.
Implementation
Implementing this framework involves several steps:
Setting Up the System: The system consists of a central unit and multiple edge computing units. Each unit serves several devices.
Device Data Management: Each device holds its data and trains its model with it. The updates from devices are sent back to their associated edge units.
Aggregating Updates: Edge units combine the updates they receive and send them to the central unit, which then creates a new model based on the combined updates.
Energy Management: Each edge unit uses WET to transfer energy to devices, calculating how much energy each device requires to operate effectively.
Dynamic Adjustments: As devices move or their energy needs change, the system dynamically adjusts which edge unit they connect to and how much energy is transferred.
Challenges in Implementation
While the proposed system has many advantages, there are challenges to consider:
Communication Bottlenecks: With many devices communicating at the same time, there could be delays or loss of data.
Device Mobility: As devices move, their energy needs may change, complicating the management of energy resources.
Data Diversity: The differences in data each device has can impact the overall effectiveness of the learning process, requiring careful management of how updates are combined.
Performance Evaluation
To evaluate the performance of this framework, extensive experiments were conducted. The goal is to establish how effective the energy management strategies are and how well the framework performs in terms of learning accuracy.
Experiment Design
The experiments involve several different setups. The central unit is located at the center of a circular area, and devices are distributed randomly within this area.
Static vs. Dynamic Scenarios: Tests are conducted with devices that remain static (not moving) and others that are dynamic (moving around).
Energy Usage: The focus is on measuring the total energy cost during operation and how efficient the energy transfers are.
Accuracy Measurement: The accuracy of the learning process is also tracked using well-known datasets.
Results
The results show that the proposed framework significantly reduces energy usage while maintaining high accuracy in learning tasks.
Energy Savings: The device scheduling and effective energy management strategies led to noticeable energy cost savings compared to traditional methods.
Learning Accuracy: Even with dynamic device conditions, the accuracy of the learning process remained high, showcasing the effectiveness of the proposed methods.
Scalability: As more devices were added to the network, the system demonstrated robust scalability. It effectively managed increased energy demands without compromising performance.
Conclusion
The proposed energy-efficient HFL framework over heterogeneous networks with wireless energy transfer demonstrates promising results in managing energy consumption and maintaining high learning performance.
By using this innovative approach, industries can better leverage their smart devices, ensuring they operate efficiently while addressing critical safety and health needs. Future work will aim to refine these methods further and explore additional ways to enhance the efficiency of federated learning systems in various environments.
Future Work
Looking ahead, there is a potential to develop better strategies for organizing devices in a network, possibly through advanced algorithms or machine learning techniques. Additional research could also explore integrating new technologies that continue to enhance energy efficiency and performance, ensuring that smart technologies remain sustainable and effective in diverse applications.
Title: Optimal Resource Management for Hierarchical Federated Learning over HetNets with Wireless Energy Transfer
Abstract: Remote monitoring systems analyze the environment dynamics in different smart industrial applications, such as occupational health and safety, and environmental monitoring. Specifically, in industrial Internet of Things (IoT) systems, the huge number of devices and the expected performance put pressure on resources, such as computational, network, and device energy. Distributed training of Machine and Deep Learning (ML/DL) models for intelligent industrial IoT applications is very challenging for resource limited devices over heterogeneous wireless networks (HetNets). Hierarchical Federated Learning (HFL) performs training at multiple layers offloading the tasks to nearby Multi-Access Edge Computing (MEC) units. In this paper, we propose a novel energy-efficient HFL framework enabled by Wireless Energy Transfer (WET) and designed for heterogeneous networks with massive Multiple-Input Multiple-Output (MIMO) wireless backhaul. Our energy-efficiency approach is formulated as a Mixed-Integer Non-Linear Programming (MINLP) problem, where we optimize the HFL device association and manage the wireless transmitted energy. However due to its high complexity, we design a Heuristic Resource Management Algorithm, namely H2RMA, that respects energy, channel quality, and accuracy constraints, while presenting a low computational complexity. We also improve the energy consumption of the network using an efficient device scheduling scheme. Finally, we investigate device mobility and its impact on the HFL performance. Our extensive experiments confirm the high performance of the proposed resource management approach in HFL over HetNets, in terms of training loss and grid energy costs.
Authors: Rami Hamdi, Ahmed Ben Said, Emna Baccour, Aiman Erbad, Amr Mohamed, Mounir Hamdi, Mohsen Guizani
Last Update: 2023-05-03 00:00:00
Language: English
Source URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.01953
Source PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.01953
Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.
Thank you to arxiv for use of its open access interoperability.