Detecting Backdoor Attacks in Deep Learning Systems
UMD offers a new way to identify complex backdoor attacks effectively.
― 5 min read
Table of Contents
BackdoorAttacks are a significant threat to deep learning systems, particularly in tasks like image classification. In these attacks, data from certain source classes is altered in a way that they will be misclassified as another target class when an attacker’s specific trigger is present. This means that images that shouldn't be misclassified can end up in the wrong category simply because they bear a hidden mark. The classic method targets one class and misclassifies all data from that class to another. However, new attack methods can involve multiple source and target classes, complicating detection efforts.
To tackle this complex problem, we introduce UMD, a method designed to detect these sophisticated backdoor attacks without needing prior knowledge or supervision. Instead of relying on existing techniques that are limited to simpler attack types, our approach can handle any number of source and target classes.
Background on Backdoor Attacks
Backdoor attacks involve manipulating a classifier to misclassify data. The idea is to poison the training data by embedding a trigger, which can be anything from a small patch to a specific noise pattern. When the model sees this trigger in testing, it classifies the data incorrectly.
For example, an attacker might add a specific pattern to images of cats so that when seen in the future, they are misidentified as dogs. The aim is to ensure that this misclassification happens only when the trigger is present, while images without the trigger remain correctly classified.
Common Types of Backdoor Attacks
- All-to-One Attack: Data from several source classes is misclassified as a single target class.
- X-to-One Attack: Similar to the all-to-one attack, but it does not require all source classes to be involved.
- One-to-One Attack: Data from one source class is misclassified as one specific target class.
- All-to-All Attack: Any source class can be misclassified as any target class.
The Need for Effective Detection
Traditional detection techniques often assume a specific setup and may not work when multiple classes are involved. This limitation creates a gap that needs to be filled to effectively handle X2X backdoor attacks, where more than one source and target class can be involved.
Overview of UMD
The UMD method we propose is Unsupervised, meaning it does not require labeled data for training or verification. It starts by trying to identify a possible trigger for each class pair using available clean samples.
Steps in UMD
Trigger Reverse Engineering: For every pair of classes, UMD attempts to determine what the backdoor trigger might look like by analyzing clean samples.
Transferability Statistic Calculation: After estimating possible triggers, UMD calculates a transferability statistic (TR) which helps to measure how likely one class is affected by the potential trigger.
Selection of Class Pairs: Using the TR values, UMD chooses promising class pairs that might be involved in the backdoor attacks.
Anomaly Detection: Finally, UMD employs an unsupervised anomaly detection method to confirm if the selected class pairs exhibit unusual behavior that indicates a backdoor attack is present.
Evaluating UMD
We extensively tested UMD on well-known image datasets: CIFAR-10, GTSRB, and Imagenette.
Data Sets Used
CIFAR-10: This dataset consists of 60,000 images across 10 classes, commonly used for image classification tasks.
GTSRB: This dataset focuses on traffic signs and includes 43 classes.
Imagenette: A smaller subset of ImageNet, it comprises 10 classes and is designed for easier classification.
Attack Configurations
UMD was tested against various settings for backdoor attacks:
Classical All-to-One Attacks: All images from a source class misclassified as one specific target class.
General All-to-All Attacks: Many source classes can misclassify into various target classes.
X-to-X Attacks: Specific pairings of source and target classes are considered.
During testing, we applied different attack scenarios to observe how well UMD could detect the backdoor attacks.
Results and Performance
Comparison with Existing Methods
In our tests, the UMD method outperformed several existing state-of-the-art (SOTA) methods, even those that required supervision. For example, it showed better accuracy in detecting attacks across different datasets.
False Positive Rate
UMD maintained a low rate of false positives, meaning it rarely misidentified benign classifiers as being attacked. This high accuracy is crucial in practical applications as it reduces unwanted alarms.
Mitigation of Detected Attacks
Once potential backdoor class pairs are detected, the information can be used to "fix" the model. The process involves retraining the model using clean samples, ensuring that it can correctly classify data even with the trigger present.
Analysis of TR
The transferability statistic (TR) is central to UMD's success. By examining the relationship between class pairs and their respective triggers, we are able to identify which pairs might be involved in backdoor attacks.
The TR statistic uses the misclassification rates when triggers from one class pair are applied to another. High TR values between class pairs suggest they are linked to a backdoor attack, whereas low values indicate that they are likely safe.
Conclusion
Backdoor attacks, especially X2X, present significant challenges for classifiers. The UMD approach provides an effective means of detecting these attacks without the need for extensive supervision. By leveraging statistical measures and unsupervised learning, UMD can identify potential threats and assist in mitigation efforts.
Future Directions
The ongoing development of backdoor detection methods is vital. Future research could focus on enhancing UMD's capabilities to handle even more complex scenarios or integrating it with other security measures to create robust defense systems against backdoor attacks in machine learning models.
In summary, our proposed UMD method addresses critical gaps in current detection capabilities for backdoor attacks and offers a promising avenue for safeguarding deep learning applications.
Title: UMD: Unsupervised Model Detection for X2X Backdoor Attacks
Abstract: Backdoor (Trojan) attack is a common threat to deep neural networks, where samples from one or more source classes embedded with a backdoor trigger will be misclassified to adversarial target classes. Existing methods for detecting whether a classifier is backdoor attacked are mostly designed for attacks with a single adversarial target (e.g., all-to-one attack). To the best of our knowledge, without supervision, no existing methods can effectively address the more general X2X attack with an arbitrary number of source classes, each paired with an arbitrary target class. In this paper, we propose UMD, the first Unsupervised Model Detection method that effectively detects X2X backdoor attacks via a joint inference of the adversarial (source, target) class pairs. In particular, we first define a novel transferability statistic to measure and select a subset of putative backdoor class pairs based on a proposed clustering approach. Then, these selected class pairs are jointly assessed based on an aggregation of their reverse-engineered trigger size for detection inference, using a robust and unsupervised anomaly detector we proposed. We conduct comprehensive evaluations on CIFAR-10, GTSRB, and Imagenette dataset, and show that our unsupervised UMD outperforms SOTA detectors (even with supervision) by 17%, 4%, and 8%, respectively, in terms of the detection accuracy against diverse X2X attacks. We also show the strong detection performance of UMD against several strong adaptive attacks.
Authors: Zhen Xiang, Zidi Xiong, Bo Li
Last Update: 2023-11-15 00:00:00
Language: English
Source URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.18651
Source PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.18651
Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.
Thank you to arxiv for use of its open access interoperability.