Simple Science

Cutting edge science explained simply

# Health Sciences# Obstetrics and Gynecology

Acupuncture for Pain Relief in Pregnancy

Acupuncture shows promise in easing pregnancy-related low back and pelvic girdle pain.

― 6 min read


Acupuncture EasesAcupuncture EasesPregnancy Painfor pregnant women.Acupuncture effectively reduces pain
Table of Contents

Low Back Pain (LBP) and pelvic girdle pain (PGP) are common issues during pregnancy. Many women experience pain between the hips and ribs, sometimes spreading to the legs. Research shows that about 45% to 77% of pregnant women suffer from these pains, with symptoms starting around 12 to 24 weeks and peaking between 24 to 36 weeks. Often, the pain is less intense in the morning but increases as the day goes on. Activities like standing, heavy lifting, and certain exercises can make the pain worse, impacting daily life.

Treatment Options

Various treatments have been suggested to relieve LBP and PGP during pregnancy. These include education about the condition, wearing pelvic support belts, physiotherapy, specific exercises, medicine, electrical stimulation, and Acupuncture. However, the effectiveness of these options can vary. In 2015, a medical group recommended that pregnant women with no complications engage in moderate exercise to help strengthen their muscles and reduce the risk of pain in the lower back. Still, many women find it hard to stick to an exercise routine as their pregnancy progresses. Using the wrong posture while exercising can lead to more pain and complications.

Acupuncture, a practice from traditional Chinese medicine, has been used for many years to relieve pain. This method involves using thin needles inserted into specific points on the body to stimulate responses that can help with pain relief. Some studies indicate that acupuncture can significantly help reduce pain for many pregnant women. Despite this, some physical therapists hesitate to use acupuncture due to concerns about its safety and the risk of causing contractions.

Research Overview

A recent review of multiple studies involving pregnant women with LBP and PGP found that acupuncture may help relieve pain compared to Standard Care. This review involved over a thousand women and indicated that acupuncture improved pain levels and overall quality of life for participants. However, it did not compare acupuncture with sham acupuncture (SAcu), where needles are inserted at spots that do not have specific acupuncture points. The lack of comparison may have left some unanswered questions about the true benefits of acupuncture, especially since pain relief can be subjective and influenced by various factors.

Study Methods

To better understand the effectiveness of acupuncture, SAcu, and standard care in treating LBP during pregnancy, a network meta-analysis was conducted. This analysis followed guidelines for reviews and was registered for transparency. Researchers searched for studies published until September 2022, looking specifically for randomized controlled trials involving pregnant women experiencing LBP and/or PGP treated with acupuncture, SAcu, or standard care.

The inclusion criteria were strict: studies had to focus on pregnant women and carefully report pain levels. Trials that involved different types of non-relevant treatments or complications were not included. The researchers independently evaluated the quality of each study, focusing on factors like how participants were assigned to groups and whether the studies were free from any biases.

Results of the Analysis

The analysis examined several studies, ultimately including eight relevant ones. The results highlighted that acupuncture and SAcu generally led to lower pain levels compared to standard care. Additionally, acupuncture was more effective than SAcu, though the difference in pain relief between the two was not statistically significant. This ranking suggests that acupuncture is likely the most effective method for pain relief among the treatments studied.

When looking at the overall effects of treatment, the results were similar. Acupuncture and SAcu both provided better outcomes than standard care, with acupuncture leading to the best results. These findings were consistent across different studies that measured quality of life, revealing that acupuncture offered significant improvements over both SAcu and standard care.

Understanding Why Acupuncture Works

The reasons behind the effectiveness of acupuncture in relieving pain are not fully understood. Some theories suggest that acupuncture stimulates pain control systems in the body, leading to the release of natural pain-relieving chemicals. Another idea is that the acupuncture needles might interfere with pain signals traveling to the brain. Additionally, the placement of the needles may trigger the body to reduce inflammation and improve blood flow, which also contributes to pain relief.

It's important to note that while acupuncture is a valuable treatment option, it requires skill and knowledge to perform correctly. This necessity can limit its availability to pregnant women, pushing healthcare providers to consider other options if acupuncture isn't practical.

Safety of Treatments

During pregnancy, finding safe treatment options is essential. Acetaminophen is often recommended for pain relief, as it is deemed safe for use during pregnancy. However, there are concerns about the potential effects of various medications on both the mother and the developing fetus, making it vital to weigh the risks and benefits of any drug therapy.

The review found that acupuncture does not seem to have severe side effects for either the mother or the baby. Some minor side effects, such as bruising or tenderness at the needle sites, were reported, but serious complications were rare. This safety profile makes acupuncture an appealing option for managing pain during pregnancy.

Challenges and Limitations

Despite the promising results, several limitations were noted in the studies included in the analysis. Variability in study design, such as differences in needle placement and the specific acupuncture techniques used, may have influenced the results. Additionally, while pain levels were measured using scales to quantify severity, these tools may not capture the complexity of pain accurately. A more comprehensive approach to assessing pain could lead to better understanding and treatment outcomes.

The need for more robust research is clear. Future studies should focus on larger groups of participants while ensuring higher standards of study design. Such improvements would help clarify the effectiveness of acupuncture for LBP in pregnant women and could support its use as a standard treatment.

Conclusion

Current evidence suggests that acupuncture is a more effective treatment for low back pain and pelvic girdle pain compared to standard care. It not only helps reduce pain but also improves the quality of life for pregnant women. While acupuncture is promising, challenges remain regarding its application and the need for further research. Overall, incorporating acupuncture and other safe treatment methods may provide pregnant women with the relief they need while minimizing risks to both mothers and their babies.

Original Source

Title: Acupuncture for the treatment of pregnancy-related low back pain: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Abstract: BackgroundDespite the effectiveness of acupuncture in the treatment of musculoskeletal pain, many physical therapists are unwilling to use it on pregnant women. A recent systematic review of acupuncture for pregnant women did not include a comparison with sham acupuncture (SAcu). Thus, we aimed to explore the effects of acupuncture, SAcu, and standard care (SC) on pregnancy-related low back pain. MethodsWe searched five different medical literature databases (PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, Springer, and Google Scholar) from inception to September 30, 2022. After screening, the following methods were identified: acupuncture, SAcu, and SC. The primary outcome was visual analog scale (VAS) intensity after the intervention. The secondary outcomes were the overall effects of treatment, quality of life (QOL), and QOL evaluated using the Short Form-36 Health Survey Questionnaire (SF-36). ResultsThe network meta-analysis included eight studies and 864 patients. Acupuncture and SAcu were relatively more advantageous in terms of analgesic effects after intervention than SC, but there were no differences between them. In terms of overall effects in number of remissions and the SF-36, Acupuncture was found to be superior to other methods, and SAcu was better than SC. Acupuncture had the highest surface under the cumulative ranking curve, followed by SAcu and SC for all outcomes. ConclusionsAcupuncture performs similarly to SAcu in pain relief and is more efficient than SC. Regarding the effectiveness of treatment and QOL, acupuncture therapy was superior to SAcu and SC.

Authors: Qi Chen, M. Lin, Z. Xiao, D. Tan, D. Zhao

Last Update: 2023-11-10 00:00:00

Language: English

Source URL: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.11.09.23298330

Source PDF: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.11.09.23298330.full.pdf

Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.

Thank you to medrxiv for use of its open access interoperability.

More from authors

Similar Articles