The Challenges of Noisy Model Learning
Examining how noise in pre-training data impacts model performance.
― 6 min read
Table of Contents
- Pre-training and Fine-tuning
- Noise in Pre-training Data
- The Impact of Noisy Data on Model Performance
- Addressing Noise through Tuning
- Goals of Noisy Model Learning
- Addressing Label Noise
- Exploring Pre-training Noise and Its Impact
- Practical Applications of Noisy Model Learning
- Conclusion
- Original Source
- Reference Links
Foundation models are large machine learning systems that have been trained on vast amounts of data. These models can be fine-tuned for various tasks, which makes them versatile and useful in many fields, such as image recognition, language processing, and more. Traditionally, creating a model for each specific task required extensive resources and time. However, foundation models allow users to leverage pre-trained models instead of starting from scratch, saving both time and effort.
Pre-training and Fine-tuning
The process of using foundation models typically involves two main steps: pre-training and fine-tuning. During pre-training, a model learns from a large dataset. This dataset may be gathered from various sources, including the internet. The aim of pre-training is to develop a general understanding of the data, which can be applied to specific tasks later on.
Once the model is pre-trained, it can be adapted to a specific task through fine-tuning. In this step, the model is adjusted using a smaller dataset that is relevant to the task. The fine-tuning process improves the model's performance on the specific task while retaining the knowledge gained during pre-training.
Noise in Pre-training Data
One challenge that arises with pre-trained models is the presence of noise in the data used for training. Noise can be incorrect or misleading information within the dataset. For example, if a dataset contains mislabeled images, this can lead to poor performance when the model is fine-tuned for a specific task. Such noise is often unavoidable due to the sheer size of datasets, especially those gathered from the internet.
Research has shown that while a small amount of noise in pre-training data may enhance the model's performance on in-domain tasks (where the training and testing data share a similar distribution), it can significantly harm performance on out-of-domain tasks (where the data distribution differs). This issue is critical for users, as it affects how well a model can adapt to new situations or applications.
Model Performance
The Impact of Noisy Data onAs models become more complex and datasets grow larger, understanding how noise in pre-training data affects performance is crucial. Experiments have shown that slight noise can benefit a model's performance on certain tasks, which seems counter-intuitive. For instance, a model trained on a slightly noisy dataset may perform better on in-domain tests because it learns to generalize better.
However, this performance boost does not carry over to out-of-domain tasks. When a model faces data that is significantly different from its training, the noise can degrade its robustness and effectiveness. This presents a challenge for developers and researchers who wish to ensure that models are not only accurate but also reliable when encountering unfamiliar data.
Addressing Noise through Tuning
To tackle the issues caused by noisy pre-training data, researchers have proposed various tuning methods. These methods aim to adjust the model's feature space-essentially the way the model represents and organizes the data it has learned. One proposed method, called NMTune, seeks to correct the detrimental effects of noise on performance without needing to retrain the model entirely.
NMTune works by reshaping the feature space of the model, allowing it to better adapt to the specific downstream task. This means that even if the pre-trained model was affected by noise, NMTune can help it regain some of its effectiveness, particularly on out-of-domain tasks. The method can be applied in a lightweight manner, making it suitable for models that are difficult to modify extensively.
Goals of Noisy Model Learning
The central pursuit of the research surrounding noisy model learning focuses on understanding and modeling the relationship between noise in pre-training data and model performance on downstream tasks. Key questions include:
- How does pre-training data noise affect downstream performance?
- What mechanisms explain this influence?
- How can the negative effects of this noise be mitigated without starting over with model training?
By addressing these questions, researchers can create strategies that help improve the generalization capabilities of models, leading to better performance across various applications.
Label Noise
AddressingLabel noise is a specific type of noise found in datasets where the labels assigned to data points are incorrect. This problem is particularly prominent in large-scale datasets gathered automatically from the web. Studies in the field of noisy label learning have sought to develop methods that enable models to train effectively despite the presence of noise.
Several techniques aim to enhance a model's robustness against noisy labels, such as designing loss functions that are more resilient to inaccuracies or implementing strategies for identifying and correcting noisy labels. While these approaches primarily focus on downstream tasks, they illustrate the importance of data quality for model accuracy and reliability.
Exploring Pre-training Noise and Its Impact
Exploring how noisy labels in pre-training datasets affect downstream tasks is a relatively new area of research. This exploration is necessary as many existing models are trained on large-scale datasets that often contain noise. The effects of this noise on model performance can vary widely based on factors such as the model architecture, the type of noise present, and the specific downstream tasks.
Understanding these factors can provide insights into how to improve model training and fine-tuning processes. For example, empirical analysis of feature spaces can reveal important information about how noise influences learning. By analyzing the distribution of features learned during pre-training, researchers can identify patterns that may guide future model development strategies.
Practical Applications of Noisy Model Learning
The implications of noisy model learning extend to numerous practical applications. For example, in fields such as healthcare, where the stakes are high, ensuring that models can perform accurately across diverse datasets is essential. Models trained in environments where noise is unavoidable must still yield reliable results when applied in real-world situations.
Additionally, no matter the industry-from self-driving cars to automated content creation-engineers and developers need to understand how to mitigate the risks associated with noisy data. By leveraging robust techniques like NMTune, they can enhance the adaptability and reliability of foundation models in various contexts.
Conclusion
Noisy model learning represents an important shift in the understanding of how pre-training data affects model performance. By focusing on the nature of noise within pre-training datasets, researchers can develop strategies that both enhance model performance and mitigate the negative impact of this noise.
Continued exploration in this area holds the promise of significantly improving the capabilities of foundation models, making them more adaptable and robust for a wide range of applications. As the field of machine learning progresses, the insights gained from studying noisy model learning will undoubtedly guide future research and best practices.
Title: Learning with Noisy Foundation Models
Abstract: Foundation models are usually pre-trained on large-scale datasets and then adapted to downstream tasks through tuning. However, the large-scale pre-training datasets, often inaccessible or too expensive to handle, can contain label noise that may adversely affect the generalization of the model and pose unexpected risks. This paper stands out as the first work to comprehensively understand and analyze the nature of noise in pre-training datasets and then effectively mitigate its impacts on downstream tasks. Specifically, through extensive experiments of fully-supervised and image-text contrastive pre-training on synthetic noisy ImageNet-1K, YFCC15M, and CC12M datasets, we demonstrate that, while slight noise in pre-training can benefit in-domain (ID) performance, where the training and testing data share a similar distribution, it always deteriorates out-of-domain (OOD) performance, where training and testing distributions are significantly different. These observations are agnostic to scales of pre-training datasets, pre-training noise types, model architectures, pre-training objectives, downstream tuning methods, and downstream applications. We empirically ascertain that the reason behind this is that the pre-training noise shapes the feature space differently. We then propose a tuning method (NMTune) to affine the feature space to mitigate the malignant effect of noise and improve generalization, which is applicable in both parameter-efficient and black-box tuning manners. We additionally conduct extensive experiments on popular vision and language models, including APIs, which are supervised and self-supervised pre-trained on realistic noisy data for evaluation. Our analysis and results demonstrate the importance of this novel and fundamental research direction, which we term as Noisy Model Learning.
Authors: Hao Chen, Jindong Wang, Zihan Wang, Ran Tao, Hongxin Wei, Xing Xie, Masashi Sugiyama, Bhiksha Raj
Last Update: 2024-03-11 00:00:00
Language: English
Source URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.06869
Source PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2403.06869
Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.
Thank you to arxiv for use of its open access interoperability.
Reference Links
- https://www.ctan.org/pkg/cite
- https://www.ctan.org/pkg/amsmath
- https://www.ctan.org/pkg/acronym
- https://www.ctan.org/pkg/algorithms
- https://www.ctan.org/pkg/algorithmicx
- https://www.ctan.org/pkg/array
- https://www.ctan.org/pkg/mdwtools
- https://www.ctan.org/pkg/eqparbox
- https://www.ctan.org/pkg/subfig
- https://www.ctan.org/pkg/fixltx2e
- https://www.ctan.org/pkg/stfloats
- https://www.ctan.org/pkg/dblfloatfix
- https://www.ctan.org/pkg/endfloat
- https://www.ctan.org/pkg/url
- https://www.ctan.org/pkg/thumbpdf
- https://www.ctan.org/pkg/breakurl
- https://www.ctan.org/pkg/hyperref