Simple Science

Cutting edge science explained simply

# Health Sciences# Ophthalmology

New Magnetic Treatment for Dry Eye Disease Shows Promise

A clinical trial tests a magnetic approach for improving dry eye symptoms.

― 6 min read


Promising New Dry EyePromising New Dry EyeTreatmentsufferers.RMS could offer hope for dry eye
Table of Contents

Dry Eye Disease (DED) is a common problem that affects many people, especially adults. It occurs when your tears are not able to keep your eyes wet enough. This condition can lead to uncomfortable symptoms like irritation, stinging, and blurry vision. When not treated, it can even cause serious issues like damage to the surface of the eye.

Studies show that DED impacts between 5% to 33% of adults around the world, and the numbers can be much higher among people who spend long hours in front of screens, reaching up to 87%. Interestingly, a large number of those affected by dry eye are women. If left unchecked, the symptoms can worsen and lead to long-term complications.

What Causes Dry Eye Disease?

DED can be caused by various factors that affect the way tears are produced or how they work. This includes problems with the structures in the eye that create moisture. The eyes need a healthy layer of tears to stay lubricated and protected, and when this layer is disrupted, it can result in damage to the eye’s surface.

The cornea, the clear front part of the eye, is densely packed with nerve endings. This makes the cornea highly sensitive to any irritation, causing pain when something goes wrong. Different stimuli can affect the eye and trigger pain signals that travel to the brain.

Treatments for Dry Eye Disease

Currently, many treatments aim to help with dry eyes. The most common methods include using eye drops that lubricate the eye or medication to reduce inflammation. However, these treatments can be costly and don't always work, especially for those with severe symptoms. This often means that patients have to use these treatments for a long time without seeing significant improvement.

Recent approaches have tried using heat and massage on the eyelids and glands responsible for tear production. Though these methods may provide temporary relief, they can also be uncomfortable.

New Treatment Approach: Repetitive Magnetic Stimulation

A new treatment called Repetitive Magnetic Stimulation (RMS) has shown promise. This method involves using magnetic signals to stimulate the eye and encourage healing. Research has indicated that this approach can protect the corneal surface in animal studies.

Our team undertook a clinical trial to study RMS in humans with DED. This was the first time RMS treatment was tested on people. The aim was to see if it could be a safe and effective option for individuals suffering from dry eyes.

Study Design

The study involved adult participants diagnosed with moderate to severe dry eyes. They were treated with the VIVEYE - Ocular Magnetic Neurostimulation System, which uses magnetic stimulation to help improve eye conditions.

Patients underwent a series of evaluations to check the safety and effectiveness of the treatment over 12 weeks. Different assessments were performed to gather data on symptoms and eye health at various points in time, including before treatment and at follow-ups.

Who Was Included in the Study?

To be part of the study, participants had to be between 18 to 80 years old and diagnosed with moderate to severe dry eye disease. Those with other serious eye problems, recent surgeries, or certain health conditions were not included. This ensured that the results reflected the treatment’s true effects on dry eye specifically.

How the Treatment Worked

The VIVEYE system uses magnetic stimulation to target areas of the eye without causing pain. Each treatment took about 11 minutes per eye. Patients were familiarized with the system before the actual treatment to ensure comfort.

This non-invasive method was designed to promote tear production and improve eye surface health. Each patient received treatment on one eye while the other served as a control without any stimulation.

Safety and Effectiveness Checks

Throughout the study, various tests were conducted to monitor patient safety. These included evaluating vision, eye pressure, and assessing any adverse effects. Effectiveness was checked by comparing symptoms and eye health before and after treatment.

The study was careful to track patient responses and any changes in their dry eye symptoms over the course of the trial.

Results of the Study

The results showed that RMS was safe for participants and did not lead to negative outcomes. Improvements were observed in areas like eye moisture and comfort levels. Some patients reported reduced symptoms and better eye health after the RMS treatment.

In particular, the National Eye Institute (NEI) scores showed that those treated with RMS experienced significant improvements compared to the control group. The Tear Break-Up Time (TBUT), which measures tear stability, also demonstrated positive changes in treated patients.

Understanding Patient Experience

Participants shared their experiences through surveys designed to measure their quality of life and eye symptoms. The feedback indicated that many felt an increase in comfort and a decrease in irritating feelings associated with dry eyes.

Overall, these findings suggest that RMS not only aids in improving objective eye conditions but also enhances the overall satisfaction of patients dealing with dry eye issues.

Comparison with Other Treatments

Unlike other treatments that may require multiple sessions, RMS proved to be more efficient with fewer treatment sessions, which could enhance patient compliance. Other treatments may involve invasive procedures or daily routines that can be inconvenient for patients.

RMS stands out as a comfortable alternative that avoids the pitfalls of traditional therapies. Its simplicity and ease of use make it a promising option for patients looking for effective relief from dry eye symptoms.

Limitations of the Study

While the results were encouraging, there were some limitations. The sample size was relatively small, which can affect how widely these results can be applied. Additionally, the study only included participants with moderate to severe symptoms, so it’s unclear if the same benefits would apply to those with milder cases.

The study also allowed for some variability in patient feedback, which can complicate the overall analysis of results.

Conclusion: A New Hope for Dry Eye Disease Treatment

In conclusion, RMS represents a new and promising method to manage Dry Eye Disease. It appears to help improve symptoms effectively without associated risks of other treatment methods. The potential for RMS to provide rapid and significant relief is valuable for patients not responding to conventional therapies.

As we move forward, more extensive studies are necessary to confirm these benefits and understand the long-term effects. The prospect of adopting RMS could lead to better treatment options for individuals suffering from dry eye syndrome, reshaping how we think about and treat this common condition.

The research is ongoing, and there is hope that RMS may become a key player in managing dry eye disease effectively and efficiently in the near future.

Original Source

Title: Evaluating Magnetic Stimulation as an Innovative Approach for Treating Dry Eye Syndrome: Safety and Efficacy Initial study

Abstract: ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to assess the safety and preliminary efficacy of repetitive magnetic stimulation (RMS) as an intervention for dry eye syndrome, focusing on symptom reduction. MethodologyThis investigation involved 22 adult participants diagnosed with moderate to severe dry eye syndrome. These individuals were subjected to RMS treatment targeting one or both eyes using the VIVEYE - Ocular Magnetic Neurostimulation System Ver 1.0 (Epitech-Mag LTD; NIH clinical trials registry #NCT03012698). A placebo-controlled group was also included for comparative analysis, with all subjects being monitored over a three-month period. The evaluation of safety encompassed monitoring changes in best corrected visual acuity, ocular pathology, and reporting of adverse events. Participant tolerance was gauged through questionnaires, measurements of intraocular pressure (IOP), Schirmers test, and vital signs. The efficacy of the treatment was assessed by comparing pre- and post-treatment scores on fluorescein staining (according to the National Eye Institute (NEI) grading) and patient-reported outcomes. ResultsThe study found no significant changes in visual acuity, IOP, or Schirmers test results between the RMS-treated and control groups (p

Authors: Abraham Solomon, H. Ben-Eli, S. Perelman, D. Wajnsztajn

Last Update: 2024-03-29 00:00:00

Language: English

Source URL: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.03.27.24304988

Source PDF: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.03.27.24304988.full.pdf

Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.

Thank you to medrxiv for use of its open access interoperability.

Similar Articles