New Therapy Using Brain Stimulation for Epilepsy
Research shows targeted brain stimulation can reduce seizures in epilepsy patients.
― 6 min read
Table of Contents
- How Focal Stimulation Works
- Brain Networks and Stimulation
- Predicting Treatment Success
- Single Pulse Electrical Stimulation (SPES)
- Study Overview
- Patient Information
- Data Collection and Analysis
- Key Findings
- Sustained Effects
- Challenges and Limitations
- Clinical Implications
- Conclusion
- Original Source
- Reference Links
Electrical brain stimulation is a new type of therapy for people who have epilepsy. This method sends electrical signals to specific parts of the brain to help control seizures. There are two main strategies for this therapy. The first is called focal stimulation, which focuses directly on the area where seizures start. The second is global stimulation, which sends signals to a larger network of brain regions. Studies suggest that focal stimulation may be more effective than global stimulation in reducing seizures.
How Focal Stimulation Works
Focal stimulation targets the area in the brain where seizures begin. Some studies have found that up to 73% of patients who received this type of stimulation reported a reduction in their seizure frequency after nine years. However, researchers have not yet determined the best specific location for stimulation within the brain. It is believed that looking at the local networks in the brain could improve the effectiveness of the treatment.
Brain Networks and Stimulation
The effects of brain stimulation may be linked to changes in the brain's structure and function. In studies involving Parkinson’s disease, researchers found that when patients received deep brain stimulation, the brain’s networks reorganized to more closely resemble those of healthy individuals. In patients with epilepsy, long-term stimulation can also lead to changes in how the brain networks function. As a result, the overall number of seizures may decrease over time. The idea is that if we could measure a patient's ability to adapt before starting treatment, we could tailor the therapy to their needs.
Predicting Treatment Success
Researchers have found that looking at electrical activity in the brain can help predict how successful brain stimulation will be. For example, when certain brain connections are stronger, the stimulation is more effective in reducing seizures. Therefore, understanding the connections in the brain may help to decide where to place the stimulation.
Single Pulse Electrical Stimulation (SPES)
One method to assess brain connectivity is Single Pulse Electrical Stimulation (SPES). In this technique, small electrical pulses are applied to pairs of electrodes placed directly on the brain. The responses generated in other electrodes can reveal how connected different parts of the brain are. Studies have shown that the regions where seizures occur have more connections, which makes them suitable targets for stimulation. Researchers believe that stimulating connected areas might help the brain adapt and improve over time.
Study Overview
In this study, researchers look into whether having a good connection between the stimulated and responding parts of the brain can change the rate of interictal epileptic discharges (IEDs), which are spikes in brain activity that can lead to seizures. They also want to see if the stimulation affects the brain’s overall activity levels.
Patient Information
The research included ten patients who had their brain activity monitored for 5-7 days. During this time, researchers identified which areas of the brain were involved in seizures. They recorded electrical activity and applied SPES, noting how the brain responded. The study was approved by ethics boards, ensuring the safety and rights of the patients were protected.
Data Collection and Analysis
Researchers used specific protocols for recording brain activity. They applied ten electrical pulses to pairs of electrodes and measured responses from different locations in the brain. By analyzing the electrical signals, researchers were able to identify patterns that could indicate the presence of IEDs.
They looked at how the number of IEDs changed after stimulation. This involved counting the IEDs before and after each electrical pulse while ignoring any signals that occurred right at the time of stimulation.
Researchers used various statistical methods to analyze the data. They compared the IED counts from different patients to see if having a strong connection between stimulated areas and responding areas impacted the outcome.
Key Findings
The results showed that when there is a strong connection between the stimulation site and the responding area, the number of IEDs tends to decrease. This suggests that targeted stimulation can help to reduce seizure activity in patients with epilepsy.
When researchers looked at the IED counts in detail, they found that stimulation led to a significant decrease in IEDs in response electrodes that showed a suppressive effect on brain activity. The data indicated that the longer the electrical signals were active, the more they reduced seizure activity.
Sustained Effects
Researchers also wanted to know how long the effects of stimulation lasted. They found that the changes in the number of IEDs were not just temporary. The reduced number of IEDs continued for a short while after the stimulation was stopped, suggesting that the brain could retain some benefits from the stimulation for a period of time.
Challenges and Limitations
This study has some limitations. It involved a small number of patients, and each patient had different areas of the brain monitored based on what doctors suspected. Researchers could not always capture responses from the stimulated electrodes due to interference from the electrical pulses.
This means that while the findings are promising, further research will be needed with a larger group of patients and more extensive testing to confirm these results.
Clinical Implications
The findings from this study suggest that using specific stimulation techniques could greatly enhance treatment for people with epilepsy. By targeting the right areas and ensuring strong connections, doctors may be able to better manage seizures and improve patient outcomes.
The research raises important questions about how to choose stimulation sites and how to monitor the brain’s response effectively. Future studies may focus on testing different stimulation parameters to see how these impact seizure frequency and overall brain health.
Conclusion
This study shows that brain stimulation can be an effective way to reduce seizure activity in patients with epilepsy. By understanding the connections within the brain and how stimulation affects these connections, doctors can improve treatment approaches and offer more personalized therapies.
As research continues, patients may benefit from refined methods that target specific brain areas to enhance their quality of life and manage their epilepsy more effectively.
Title: Local cortical network stimulation as a concept for focal epilepsy treatment
Abstract: BackgroundElectrical stimulation therapy for epilepsy patients is applied either to the epileptogenic region or to a larger network (e.g. with deep brain stimulation). Objective/hypothesisResponses to single pulse electrical stimuli (SPES) reveal potential stimulation sites that target the epileptogenic region for cortical network stimulation therapy. MethodsWe applied SPES to ten epilepsy patients who underwent intracranial electrocorticography recordings for pre-surgical evaluation. We detected cortico-cortical evoked potentials (CCEPs) in response electrodes after stimulating other pairs of electrodes, revealing effective connections. We calculated event-related spectral perturbation (ERSP) plots in all response electrodes after stimulating other electrode pairs. We detected interictal epileptic discharges (IEDs) before and after each single pulse and calculated the logarithmic IED ratio. We analyzed whether power suppression in the ERSP occurred in a response electrode when connected with the stimulus pair. We analyzed whether a larger change in IED ratio was accompanied by power suppression in the response electrode or when this electrode was connected with the stimulus pair. ResultsWe found that SPES has a neuromodulatory effect measured as: 1) the relationship of a CCEP and power suppression, 2) a larger change in IED rate when a CCEP was present, 3) a decrease in IED rate when power suppression was observed. Conclusion(s)Results suggest that stimulation in an area connected to the epileptogenic region can modulate IEDs in this region. SPES might provide a template for localizing a stimulation site outside the epileptogenic region for electrical stimulation treatment of epilepsy. HighlightsO_LIStimulation of an electrode pair can suppress power in an electrode on connected tissue. C_LIO_LIStimulation of an electrode pair changes IED rate in an electrode on connected tissue. C_LIO_LIA decrease in IED rate was accompanied by power suppression. C_LIO_LISPES indicates potential stimulation sites for neurostimulation therapy in epilepsy. C_LI
Authors: Dorien van Blooijs, M. van der Stoel, G. Huiskamp, M. Demuru, N. Ramsey, F. Leijten
Last Update: 2023-10-31 00:00:00
Language: English
Source URL: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.10.30.23297463
Source PDF: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.10.30.23297463.full.pdf
Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.
Thank you to medrxiv for use of its open access interoperability.