Enhancing Language Models with Cognitive Maps
This research improves language models' planning through cognitive maps.
― 5 min read
Table of Contents
Language models have become skilled in handling various tasks related to understanding and generating text. However, they often face challenges when it comes to tasks that need complex planning over multiple steps. This research looks into how language models can be improved by using a concept derived from human thought processes, known as a cognitive map.
What is a Cognitive Map?
A cognitive map is a mental representation of physical locations or environments. Humans use Cognitive Maps to plan routes, understand spaces, and make decisions. This paper explores how language models can create a similar type of cognitive map to enhance their planning abilities.
How Do We Test This?
To assess the effectiveness of cognitive maps in language models, we focused on a simple grid-based environment called Gridworld. In Gridworld, the model must find a path from a starting position to a goal while navigating obstacles like walls and pits.
Steps in Using Cognitive Maps
- Initialize the Environment: We set up the Gridworld so the model knows where the start and goal positions are.
- Input Instructions: We provide instructions that describe the environment and possible moves.
- Cognitive Map Construction: Before making any moves, the model creates a cognitive map based on the input.
- Interacting with the Environment: The model uses the cognitive map to navigate through the Gridworld. We then analyze both optimal plans (the best route) and reachable plans (any valid route).
Cognitive Map Creation Process
The construction of the cognitive map involves three main steps:
- Sampling: The model identifies possible actions at each step.
- Propagation: For each action, the model predicts the new state it will reach.
- Backtracking: After reaching the goal, the model works backward to refine its path. This is crucial for ensuring the model finds the best route.
Why Are Cognitive Maps Helpful?
Our experiments confirmed that cognitive maps significantly improve the ability of language models to generate effective plans. Two key benefits are:
- Extrapolation: The ability to apply learned skills to larger environments not seen during training.
- Rapid Adaptation: Learning new tasks quickly with minimal training data.
Background on Planning Skills
Language models are often trained by predicting the next word in a sentence, which allows them to generate coherent text based on learned patterns. However, this training method doesn't prepare them well for complex planning tasks that require multiple steps.
Human Planning vs. Language Models
Humans often use a model-based approach to planning. This means they build internal models of the world and simulate outcomes to make decisions. Studies in cognitive science suggest that this method is effective for solving complex problems. In contrast, many language models rely on pattern recognition, which has limitations when faced with tasks requiring long-term planning and reasoning.
Existing Planning Methods
Various methods have been developed to improve planning in language models:
- Exploration-based Planning: Techniques that allow models to explore different paths and state spaces but may sacrifice finding the best path.
- Imitation-based Planning: This method uses examples of optimal behavior, helping models learn to plan effectively. While it shows promise, it often fails to generalize in unfamiliar settings.
Why Cognitive Maps Succeed
By using cognitive maps, language models can better represent their understanding of the environment. This representation helps them simulate different scenarios and predict outcomes, leading to better decision-making.
Experimental Setup
To test our cognitive map approach, we designed a series of experiments using Gridworld. In this environment, models are tasked with avoiding obstacles while finding the optimal path to the goal.
Details of the Experiments
- Training: The models were trained on various grid sizes, and we ensured each training scenario had only one valid path to the goal.
- Testing: After training, the models were evaluated using different scenarios to test their planning capabilities.
Analyzing Results
We assessed both the optimal plan (best route) and reachable plan (valid route). The results showed that models using cognitive maps performed better than traditional methods in both settings.
Findings and Insights
After conducting the experiments, we discovered several important findings:
Improved Planning Performance
Models that employed cognitive maps showed significant improvements in both optimal and reachable planning. The cognitive maps allowed them to make informed decisions, leading to higher success rates in finding paths.
Backtracking Enhances Results
In our analysis, we found that incorporating backtracking into the cognitive map construction greatly improved the models' performance. This step allowed models to refine their choices based on earlier predictions, leading to more efficient planning.
Extrapolation and Rapid Learning
The cognitive maps not only aided in planning within the training scenarios but also allowed models to apply their skills to larger and unseen environments. They also demonstrated an ability to learn quickly with limited data points.
Comparison with Other Planning Approaches
When we compared our cognitive map method to other existing techniques, such as exploration-based planning, we noticed that while exploration methods are great for reaching goals, they often lack the ability to find the most efficient paths. In contrast, cognitive maps enabled much better planning without losing sight of the optimal routes.
Implications for Future Research
The success of cognitive maps emphasizes the need for further exploration into structured planning approaches in language models. By bridging the gap between human-like cognitive processes and artificial intelligence, we can develop more effective systems in the future.
Conclusion
Cognitive maps represent a promising direction for enhancing planning in language models. By mimicking human cognitive strategies, language models can improve their ability to understand and navigate complex environments. This research opens up new possibilities for creating more advanced AI systems that better reflect human thought processes and decision-making abilities.
In summary, utilizing cognitive maps in language models provides significant advantages in planning tasks, showcasing the potential for more intelligent and adaptable AI systems moving forward.
Title: How language models extrapolate outside the training data: A case study in Textualized Gridworld
Abstract: Language models' ability to extrapolate learned behaviors to novel, more complex environments beyond their training scope is highly unknown. This study introduces a path planning task in a textualized Gridworld to probe language models' extrapolation capabilities. We show that conventional approaches, including next token prediction and Chain of Thought (CoT) finetuning, fail to extrapolate in larger, unseen environments. Inspired by human cognition and dual process theory, we propose cognitive maps for path planning, a novel CoT framework that simulates humanlike mental representations. Our experiments show that cognitive maps not only enhance extrapolation to unseen environments but also exhibit humanlike characteristics through structured mental simulation and rapid adaptation. Our finding that these cognitive maps require specialized training schemes and cannot be induced through simple prompting opens up important questions about developing general-purpose cognitive maps in language models. Our comparison with exploration-based methods further illuminates the complementary strengths of offline planning and online exploration.
Authors: Doyoung Kim, Jongwon Lee, Jinho Park, Minjoon Seo
Last Update: 2024-12-05 00:00:00
Language: English
Source URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.15275
Source PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2406.15275
Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.
Thank you to arxiv for use of its open access interoperability.