Advancements in Lip-Based Biometric Authentication
A new method improves identity verification using unique lip features.
― 5 min read
Table of Contents
Lip-based biometric authentication (LBBA) has gained interest in recent years as a way to verify a person's identity. This technique uses the unique features of a person's lips, such as their shape, color, and movement, to create a distinctive identification method that is both secure and practical.
Why Use Lips for Authentication?
Lips serve as both a physical and behavioral identifier. A person's lip structure is unique, similar to fingerprints or facial features. Additionally, how a person moves their lips while speaking can differ greatly, even when saying the same words. This combination of features makes LBBA a valuable tool for identity verification.
Unlike traditional methods, such as passwords or PINs, biometric traits like those found in lips are difficult to forget or transfer. This means that people do not have to worry about losing their authentication method or having someone else use it. Biometric systems also provide a higher level of security, as the traits cannot be easily copied or faked.
The Importance of Emotions
A major aspect of lip-based authentication involves recognizing that a person's emotional state can influence their lip movements. For example, speaking while happy may result in different expressions compared to speaking while sad. Previous research did not take this into account, which could potentially affect the accuracy of the authentication process.
Proposed Solution: The WhisperNetV2
To tackle these challenges, researchers have introduced a new approach named WhisperNetV2. This method builds upon an earlier version called WhisperNet and focuses on capturing both physiological and behavioral traits of lip movements. This is achieved through a special network structure called a Siamese network, which allows the system to learn from pairs of lip movement videos.
The new method utilizes two pathways in its network. One pathway, called the fast pathway, captures quick movements of the lips with high detail. The other pathway, called the slow pathway, examines the more stable features of the lips at a slower rate. By combining these two pathways, the system can better analyze the unique movements and features of a person's lips.
Training the System
The researchers trained their new model using a specific dataset that included videos of people speaking in various Emotional States. This dataset allowed the system to learn how different emotions could affect lip movements. By training the network on a range of expressions, the system became better at recognizing and adapting to these changes during the authentication process.
The training involved comparing videos of the same person speaking the same phrase, as well as videos of different people. The goal was for the system to learn to distinguish between genuine users and imposters effectively.
Challenges in Lip-Based Authentication
One of the main difficulties in lip-based authentication is how people's appearances can change over time. For example, a person might grow facial hair or change their makeup. These changes can impact the accuracy of recognition. It is essential to train the system using various types of data to make it adaptable to these shifts.
Another challenge is that different emotional states can alter how a person moves their lips during speech. If someone is upset, their mouth movement might differ compared to when they are relaxed. If the system cannot account for these differences, it may increase the chances of denying access to a legitimate user.
Results and Performance
The performance of WhisperNetV2 was evaluated using several metrics, including the False Acceptance Rate (FAR) and False Rejection Rate (FRR). The FAR measures how often the system incorrectly identifies an imposter as a valid user. The FRR measures how often the system rejects a legitimate user. Ideally, both rates should be low for a secure system.
The current model achieved an impressive Equal Error Rate (EER) of 0.005, which means it performs better than many other lip-based authentication systems. This low EER indicates a strong ability to correctly identify users while minimizing the risk of false rejections.
Advantages of LBBA
LBBA offers several benefits over traditional authentication methods. For one, it does not require special equipment; a standard smartphone camera can capture the necessary videos. This makes lip-based authentication easy to implement and accessible for users.
Moreover, since lips are a biological trait, they are more secure than methods that rely on knowledge-based systems like passwords. Even with two-factor authentication systems in place, traditional methods are more vulnerable to spoofing attacks. LBBA provides a more reliable solution that addresses many of these concerns.
Another advantage is the hygienic aspect of using lips for authentication. Unlike fingerprint systems that require physical contact, lip-based systems can function without touching any surface, making them more suitable for public use.
Future Directions
While the WhisperNetV2 system shows great promise, there are still some challenges to address. For instance, the system's performance may vary under different lighting conditions or resolutions. Testing the system in real-world environments will be crucial in ensuring its reliability.
Expanding the dataset used for training is also important. The current dataset may not represent all possible variations of lip movements and emotions. Developing a larger dataset that captures a broader range of expressions and lip movements will help enhance the system's ability to adapt to various users and scenarios.
Conclusion
Lip-based biometric authentication represents an innovative solution for secure identity verification. The development of WhisperNetV2 provides a more effective method for analyzing lip movements by incorporating both physiological and behavioral characteristics. With its impressive performance and practical advantages, lip-based authentication has the potential to be a fundamental part of future security systems.
By addressing the challenges related to emotions and variations in appearance, researchers can further improve the effectiveness of LBBA methods. The ongoing work in this field will likely lead to increased security and usability in various applications, making biometric authentication accessible to a wider audience.
Title: WhisperNetV2: SlowFast Siamese Network For Lip-Based Biometrics
Abstract: Lip-based biometric authentication (LBBA) has attracted many researchers during the last decade. The lip is specifically interesting for biometric researchers because it is a twin biometric with the potential to function both as a physiological and a behavioral trait. Although much valuable research was conducted on LBBA, none of them considered the different emotions of the client during the video acquisition step of LBBA, which can potentially affect the client's facial expressions and speech tempo. We proposed a novel network structure called WhisperNetV2, which extends our previously proposed network called WhisperNet. Our proposed network leverages a deep Siamese structure with triplet loss having three identical SlowFast networks as embedding networks. The SlowFast network is an excellent candidate for our task since the fast pathway extracts motion-related features (behavioral lip movements) with a high frame rate and low channel capacity. The slow pathway extracts visual features (physiological lip appearance) with a low frame rate and high channel capacity. Using an open-set protocol, we trained our network using the CREMA-D dataset and acquired an Equal Error Rate (EER) of 0.005 on the test set. Considering that the acquired EER is less than most similar LBBA methods, our method can be considered as a state-of-the-art LBBA method.
Authors: Abdollah Zakeri, Hamid Hassanpour, Mohammad Hossein Khosravi, Amir Masoud Nourollah
Last Update: 2024-07-11 00:00:00
Language: English
Source URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.08717
Source PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2407.08717
Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.
Thank you to arxiv for use of its open access interoperability.