Simple Science

Cutting edge science explained simply

# Computer Science# Computation and Language# Artificial Intelligence

The Confusion of Large Language Models

Exploring how smaller models struggle with inaccuracies from larger counterparts.

Phil Wee, Riyadh Baghdadi

― 6 min read


AI Models and TheirAI Models and TheirErrorsand responses.Exploring inaccuracies in AI training
Table of Contents

In the world of artificial intelligence, bigger isn't always better, but it sure can be more confusing! Large language models (LLMs) can produce surprisingly human-like text, which is great until you realize that sometimes, they make stuff up. When smaller models are trained using data from these larger models, they can take this habit of making things up to a whole new level. So, what’s going on here?

The Hallucination Phenomenon

Imagine asking your friend a question and they give you a wildly wrong answer. You might think, "Are they serious?" Well, that's what happens with models too-they sometimes generate answers that make no sense at all. This tendency to produce inaccurate responses is known as "hallucination," and it’s a bit of a headache in AI.

When these models generate text, they can sound fluent and convincing, but they might be spitting out completely made-up information. This isn’t just an embarrassing quirk; it could lead to spreading false information, which can be harmful, especially in fields like healthcare.

Why Do Models Hallucinate?

Let's tackle the big question: Why do these models make errors? There are quite a few reasons that contribute to this issue.

  1. Faulty Data: Just like if you read a bad book, you might end up repeating incorrect facts, these models rely on the data they're fed. If the training data has errors, the model can pick those up too.

  2. Incomplete Knowledge: No model is trained on every single bit of information out there. So when it encounters a question it hasn’t seen before, it has to guess. Sometimes, a guess is not the best way to answer!

  3. Duplication: Training data often contains repetitive information. Models can get stuck in a loop of these repeated phrases, leading to the same mistakes.

  4. Big Ideas, Small Models: Smaller models trained on data from larger models can have a rough time. They might not have all the background information and can easily get lost.

Knowledge Mismatch: A New Angle

One intriguing idea is that there might be a "knowledge mismatch" happening when smaller models are trained on data from larger models. Let’s break that down.

Imagine you’re trying to learn a language, and your teacher is speaking way above your level. You might catch some words, but without the basics, you’ll be confused. Similarly, when smaller models are trained with data from bigger models, they might not match up with what they already know. This mismatch can lead to bad guesses, increasing the chance of hallucination.

For example, if you train a model to answer questions about the President of the United States, but the way it learns this information doesn't quite fit with what it already knows, it might think up a name that’s totally off the wall. Or it might just go silent and say, "I don’t know," when it actually does.

What Happens When We Test This?

To explore this idea, experiments have been run by taking two models of different sizes-a smaller one and a larger one. The smaller model gets trained on data created by the larger model. If the knowledge mismatch theory holds, we should expect that the smaller model will produce more Incorrect Answers.

And surprise! That’s exactly what researchers found. The smaller models, when trained this way, generated a significantly higher number of wrong answers compared to when they were trained solely on their own data. It’s like trying to bake a cake using instructions that were written in a different language. The chances of success? Not great!

Examining the Results

In experiments, a specific small model was fine-tuned using a dataset created from a larger model. The results showed a whopping increase in incorrect answers-an average of 125% more wrong responses. You could say the smaller models were having an off day, but the truth is, they were set up for failure from the start!

When the small model was trained with its own responses, it had a much better track record. It did a much better job at knowing when to pass up on questions it wasn’t sure about, showcasing that familiarity with one’s own workspace (or data, in this case) matters a lot.

The Number of "I Don’t Knows"

Interestingly, when the smaller model was trained on data from the larger model, it also had fewer responses of “I don’t know.” Why? Because the large model was generating answers that were more forward with information. This made the smaller model less likely to admit its own lack of knowledge, resulting in even more incorrect statements instead.

Growth in Answers but Not in Truthfulness

Now, let’s not kid ourselves. Even if the smaller models trained on larger models produced more wrong answers, they also churned out a lot of correct answers too. So, it’s a mixed bag. While they may become increasingly verbose, the quality of the information can suffer greatly.

Why All This Matters

So, why should we care about this mismatch and the Hallucinations happening in AI? Well, these models are being used more and more in various applications, from chatbots to personal assistants, and even in healthcare scenarios. Misinformation can lead to real-world consequences-imagine a chatbot giving medical advice based on inaccurate data!

Other Factors at Play

It’s also crucial to note that knowledge mismatch is just one of the many reasons models hallucinate. Data Quality, the way models train, and how they make decisions also contribute to the overall performance. While figuring out how to reduce hallucinations is vital, understanding the multi-faceted nature of AI behavior will help us create better, more reliable models.

Conclusion

In wrapping up, the world of language models is fascinating and downright entertaining, but it comes with its fair share of challenges. Smaller models trained on larger, more complex models can find themselves in a bind, struggling with answering questions accurately due to mismatched knowledge. The things we see in AI aren’t too far off from everyday life; sometimes, it’s just about being in the right place with the right tools.

So next time your model gives a head-scratching answer, just remember: it might be stuck in an awkward conversation trying to guess what you meant! It’s a wild ride in the world of AI, and we’re all still figuring out how to make the best of it.

Original Source

Title: Exploring the Knowledge Mismatch Hypothesis: Hallucination Propensity in Small Models Fine-tuned on Data from Larger Models

Abstract: Recently, there has been an explosion of large language models created through fine-tuning with data from larger models. These small models able to produce outputs that appear qualitatively similar to significantly larger models. However, one of the key limitations that have been observed with these models is their propensity to hallucinate significantly more often than larger models. In particular, they have been observed to generate coherent outputs that involve factually incorrect information and spread misinformation, toxicity, and stereotypes. There are many potential causes of hallucination, of which, one hypothesis is that fine-tuning a model on data produced by a larger model leads to a knowledge mismatch which contributes to hallucination. In particular, it is hypothesized that there is a mismatch between the knowledge that is fed to the model to fine-tune it and the knowledge that is already present in the graph. Fine-tuning the model on data that has such mismatch could contribute to an increased propensity to hallucinate. We show that on an unseen test set, a smaller model fine-tuned on data generated from a larger model produced more wrong answers when compared to models fine-tuned on data created by the small model, which confirms the hypothesis.

Authors: Phil Wee, Riyadh Baghdadi

Last Update: 2024-10-31 00:00:00

Language: English

Source URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.00878

Source PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2411.00878

Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.

Thank you to arxiv for use of its open access interoperability.

More from authors

Similar Articles