Simple Science

Cutting edge science explained simply

# Computer Science# Computation and Language# Artificial Intelligence# Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition# Information Retrieval# Machine Learning

Streamlining Search with Multimodal Language Models

A look into improving search through multimodal large language models.

Sheng-Chieh Lin, Chankyu Lee, Mohammad Shoeybi, Jimmy Lin, Bryan Catanzaro, Wei Ping

― 6 min read


Next-Gen Search SolutionsNext-Gen Search Solutionsadvanced multimodal models.Revolutionizing how we search with
Table of Contents

In today’s digital world, finding the right information can be challenging. Think of it like searching for a needle in a haystack, but instead of just hay, you have a mix of images, text, and who knows what else. This paper talks about a way to make search easier using something called Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs). These fancy tools help us search using different types of information-like asking a question with both words and pictures.

The Challenge of Searching

Most traditional search tools only handle one type of information at a time. Want to find a picture of a cat doing yoga? Well, good luck if your search tool can only understand plain text! This paper shows that we can do better. By using MLLMs, we can look for information that mixes text and images without losing our minds.

Making Searches Smarter

We started by fine-tuning these MLLMs to become better search helpers. We tested them on various tasks, including some tough ones where people used both words and pictures. It turns out that our models can figure out tricky queries, though they sometimes struggle compared to smaller models that are built just for images and text.

To improve this, we came up with a method to help our models pay better attention to the types of information people want. For instance, if someone asks for a picture but the model thinks a text result is good enough, that’s not very helpful!

The Solution: Hard Negative Mining

To tackle this issue, we introduced something called modality-aware hard negative mining. That’s a mouthful, but it simply means we taught our models to better understand what people really want when they search. By including examples of what not to show, we made them a lot smarter.

Next, we kept refining our search helper. We wanted to keep improving how it handles both text and pictures without leaving either behind. And guess what? Our final model performed really well on benchmarks that measure how good a search tool is at handling multiple types of searches.

Understanding User Instructions

One key to our success was helping our MLLMs understand the hints that users give. When someone types in a search, they often have specific requests. For example, asking for a funny cat video is different from wanting a serious history lesson about cats. By training our models to recognize these hints, we made them a lot more effective.

Zero-Shot Reranking

Another aspect we explored was using our MLLMs to rerank search results. Imagine searching for a recipe and getting a million results, but only a few are actually what you want. We figured out that our MLLMs could help improve the order of these results, ensuring that the best options show up first.

Results: It’s a Win

After all this hard work, our study revealed that our MLLMs significantly improved how well we could retrieve information. They not only stood out in multimodal search tasks but also beat some of the best text-only models. That’s like finding out your quirky uncle can juggle while riding a unicycle-unexpected but impressive!

Future Directions

While we’re thrilled with our results, we believe there’s still a long way to go. We’re looking at distilling our knowledge into smaller models that can still pack a punch. We also see a future where combining our techniques with other methods can lead to even better search experiences.

Conclusion

This paper shows the exciting potential of using multimodal language models to make searches easier and smarter. By blending images and text, we can provide people with better answers to their queries. It’s like turning a regular old flashlight into a super bright searchlight that can find whatever you’re looking for-be it a lost sock or the best pizza joint in town!

The Nuts and Bolts of Retrieval

What Makes It Work?

The key to effective retrieval lies in understanding both the user’s intent and the content’s modality. We developed methods that allow our MLLMs to learn from diverse datasets, helping them to better understand what users really want.

How We Tested

We took our newly trained models and put them through their paces. By comparing them to existing models, we gathered data on how well they performed across different tasks. Our findings were encouraging, indicating a marked improvement in retrieval accuracy.

Learning from Mistakes

A big part of the learning process was recognizing where we went wrong. By analyzing cases where our models failed to deliver the right results, we adjusted our training methods and refined our approach. Each misstep turned into a stepping stone for progress.

The Bigger Picture

As we look ahead to the future of information retrieval, we’re excited about the possibilities. The world is filled with a plethora of information in different formats. Our work suggests that utilizing these multimodal tools can reshape how people interact with data, making it not only easier to find what they need but also more enjoyable.

Practical Applications

Imagine walking into a library where you can ask a question and get both books and related images handed to you. Or think about searching for travel guides where text and photos of destinations combine to paint a complete picture. This is the type of future our research is aiming for.

Bridging the Gap

The combination of images and text can help bridge the gap between information seekers and the content they require. As researchers, our responsibility is to harness these advancements to create a smoother and more intuitive process for everyone involved.

The Impact on Users

Ultimately, our goal is to enhance how people connect with information. By improving retrieval methods, we can make searching feel less like a chore and more like a quest. Whether someone is looking for fun facts or serious studies, we want to ensure they leave satisfied.

Final Thoughts

As we conclude this discussion, we hope to inspire others in the field to pursue new and innovative ways to enhance information retrieval. We’re only scratching the surface of what’s possible when we blend various modalities in our searches. The future looks bright, and we can’t wait to see where it leads!

Original Source

Title: MM-Embed: Universal Multimodal Retrieval with Multimodal LLMs

Abstract: State-of-the-art retrieval models typically address a straightforward search scenario, where retrieval tasks are fixed (e.g., finding a passage to answer a specific question) and only a single modality is supported for both queries and retrieved results. This paper introduces techniques for advancing information retrieval with multimodal large language models (MLLMs), enabling a broader search scenario, termed universal multimodal retrieval, where multiple modalities and diverse retrieval tasks are accommodated. To this end, we first study fine-tuning an MLLM as a bi-encoder retriever on 10 datasets with 16 retrieval tasks. Our empirical results show that the fine-tuned MLLM retriever is capable of understanding challenging queries, composed of both text and image, but underperforms a smaller CLIP retriever in cross-modal retrieval tasks due to modality bias from MLLMs. To address the issue, we propose modality-aware hard negative mining to mitigate the modality bias exhibited by MLLM retrievers. Second, we propose to continually fine-tune the universal multimodal retriever to enhance its text retrieval capability while maintaining multimodal retrieval capability. As a result, our model, MM-Embed, achieves state-of-the-art performance on the multimodal retrieval benchmark M-BEIR, which spans multiple domains and tasks, while also surpassing the state-of-the-art text retrieval model, NV-Embed-v1, on MTEB retrieval benchmark. Finally, we explore to prompt the off-the-shelf MLLMs as the zero-shot rerankers to refine the ranking of the candidates from the multimodal retriever. We find that through prompt-and-reranking, MLLMs can further improve multimodal retrieval when the user queries (e.g., text-image composed queries) are more complex and challenging to understand. These findings also pave the way to advance universal multimodal retrieval in the future.

Authors: Sheng-Chieh Lin, Chankyu Lee, Mohammad Shoeybi, Jimmy Lin, Bryan Catanzaro, Wei Ping

Last Update: Nov 4, 2024

Language: English

Source URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.02571

Source PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2411.02571

Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.

Thank you to arxiv for use of its open access interoperability.

More from authors

Similar Articles