Simple Science

Cutting edge science explained simply

# Computer Science# Computation and Language

Bridging Language Gaps with MILU

MILU aims to improve language models for Indian languages.

Sshubam Verma, Mohammed Safi Ur Rahman Khan, Vishwajeet Kumar, Rudra Murthy, Jaydeep Sen

― 6 min read


Improving Indian LanguageImproving Indian LanguageModelsrepresentation in tech.MILU benchmarks aim for better cultural
Table of Contents

In today's world, Language Models are the new superheroes of technology. They can understand and generate text in many languages, making them essential for communicating globally. But, there's a catch! Most of these models shine brightly in English and often leave other languages in the shadows, especially those spoken in India, where many folks use non-Latin scripts. This gap is a big deal because it means that our chatty technology isn't as friendly or useful to everyone.

To fix this, researchers have come up with a new tool called the Multi-task Indic Language Understanding Benchmark (MILU). It's designed to evaluate how well these language models can understand and respond to various subjects in 11 different Indian Languages. Think of it as a report card for our tech-savvy friends, ensuring they can handle not just math and science but also local history, arts, laws, and even festivals.

Why Do We Need MILU?

India is a vibrant country with over 1.4 billion people speaking more than 120 languages and many dialects. This diversity presents a unique puzzle for language models. Most of the existing benchmarks, or tests, focus heavily on English and forget about the rich tapestry of Indian languages. This results in many language models being trained on data that doesn't represent the everyday knowledge, culture, and customs of India.

A well-structured benchmark like MILU is essential because it exposes the shortcomings of these language models and points out where they can improve. It also helps researchers create better models that can connect more meaningfully with people across different cultures. And let's be honest, wouldn't you want your virtual assistant to know about your local festival instead of just giving you the weather update?

What is in the MILU Benchmark?

MILU is a comprehensive Evaluation Tool that covers a wide range of subjects across 11 Indian languages. It spans eight main areas, including:

  1. Arts and Humanities: This area covers Indian art, literature, dance, festivals, and architecture.

  2. Science and Maths: A space for physics, chemistry, and math, where even ancient Indian scientific contributions get their moment to shine.

  3. Health and Medicine: Discussing public health, government initiatives, and even traditional medicine like Ayurveda.

  4. Business Studies: Focused on trade, entrepreneurship, and policies that drive the economy.

  5. Law and Governance: Covering topics like the Indian constitution, rights, and public administration.

  6. Environmental Sciences: A look into environmental policies and local initiatives.

  7. Social Sciences: A dive into history, geography, and politics from an Indian perspective.

  8. Engineering and Technology: Discussions about modern developments in technology and infrastructure.

MILU is not just throwing together any old questions. It includes culturally relevant content, pulling from local exams and covering topics that matter to people’s daily lives. In total, MILU has around 85,000 questions collected from over 1,500 competitive exams across various subjects and languages.

How Were the Questions Collected?

To ensure we get a solid mix of questions, researchers scoured the internet for past exam papers. They gathered data from many public exams that people take if they want to further their education or upgrade their careers. This included civil service exams and tests from private organizations. Each question was carefully tagged with its topic and language details to keep things organized.

The researchers faced a few hiccups along the way. Sometimes questions were poorly labeled, or incorrect entries slipped through. To tackle this, they ran through layers of checks and cleaning to ensure the quality of the data. It’s like cleaning your room before friends come over – you want everything to look just right!

The Evaluation Process

Now that they had a treasure trove of questions, it was time to test how different language models performed with this new benchmark. They took 45 different models, both proprietary and open-source, and put them through their paces.

The researchers ran different tests with the models, trying out zero-shot, one-shot, and five-shot setups. If those terms sound confusing, think of them as ways to see how well models can answer questions when given varying amounts of examples. Zero-shot means the model sees no examples, one-shot means it gets one, and five-shot means it gets five. It’s like your friend asking for help with a math problem and you throwing them a lifeline or drowning them in tips!

The evaluation was clean and systematic, ensuring that the results were reproducible, and everyone could follow along.

The Results Are In!

After all the testing, the results were pretty eye-opening. The best performer, GPT-4o, managed an average accuracy of 72% – not too shabby! But when diving deeper into the data, it became clear that many models struggled, especially with culturally specific questions.

Models that were trained specifically for languages in India often performed worse than their English counterparts. It became evident that while general subjects like science and math weren’t a big deal for these models, they floundered when it came to arts, humanities, and local governance topics. It’s like asking an engineer to recite poetry – some people just aren’t built for that!

The Importance of Cultural Relevance

One highlight of the study was the realization that models performed much better in high-resource languages (like Hindi and Bengali) compared to low-resource ones. This tells us that there’s a significant need for better strategies when building language models that can cater to all Indian languages.

Moreover, the models’ lack of cultural knowledge raised the question of how future benchmarks can include more diverse topics and ensure equitable representation of all cultures. After all, who wants to live in a world where technology doesn't understand their culture or traditions?

What Lies Ahead?

The researchers behind MILU are not stopping here. They have spotted a few areas for improvement. They want to expand the benchmark to include more languages and ensure that cultural knowledge is not just a checkbox but a core requirement for language models.

As technology keeps growing, there's a big push to make sure that language models are not just smart but also aware of the people they’re serving. Just imagine a chatbot that knows when Diwali is, or a virtual assistant that gives you the rundown of your local festival. The future looks bright!

Conclusion

In summary, MILU is paving the way for better language models that can serve the diverse population of India. It highlights the need for inclusive tools that recognize the cultural richness of the country. As these benchmarks evolve, it’s like putting on a new pair of glasses – everything becomes clearer and more connected.

With proper evaluation, reflection, and open research, we can hope for a world where language models are not just talking heads but insightful companions that understand and celebrate the various cultures they serve. So, here’s to a future where technology becomes more local and less global, and we're all the better for it!

Final Thoughts

As we wrap this up, it’s crucial to remember the importance of language and culture in technology. Just like a good cup of chai, the blend of understanding and relevance makes all the difference. Let’s keep pushing for advancements and be the champions of inclusivity in language technology!

Original Source

Title: MILU: A Multi-task Indic Language Understanding Benchmark

Abstract: Evaluating Large Language Models (LLMs) in low-resource and linguistically diverse languages remains a significant challenge in NLP, particularly for languages using non-Latin scripts like those spoken in India. Existing benchmarks predominantly focus on English, leaving substantial gaps in assessing LLM capabilities in these languages. We introduce MILU, a Multi task Indic Language Understanding Benchmark, a comprehensive evaluation benchmark designed to address this gap. MILU spans 8 domains and 42 subjects across 11 Indic languages, reflecting both general and culturally specific knowledge. With an India-centric design, incorporates material from regional and state-level examinations, covering topics such as local history, arts, festivals, and laws, alongside standard subjects like science and mathematics. We evaluate over 45 LLMs, and find that current LLMs struggle with MILU, with GPT-4o achieving the highest average accuracy at 72 percent. Open multilingual models outperform language-specific fine-tuned models, which perform only slightly better than random baselines. Models also perform better in high resource languages as compared to low resource ones. Domain-wise analysis indicates that models perform poorly in culturally relevant areas like Arts and Humanities, Law and Governance compared to general fields like STEM. To the best of our knowledge, MILU is the first of its kind benchmark focused on Indic languages, serving as a crucial step towards comprehensive cultural evaluation. All code, benchmarks, and artifacts are publicly available to foster open research.

Authors: Sshubam Verma, Mohammed Safi Ur Rahman Khan, Vishwajeet Kumar, Rudra Murthy, Jaydeep Sen

Last Update: 2024-11-13 00:00:00

Language: English

Source URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.02538

Source PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2411.02538

Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.

Thank you to arxiv for use of its open access interoperability.

Reference Links

More from authors

Similar Articles