Simple Science

Cutting edge science explained simply

# Electrical Engineering and Systems Science # Machine Learning # Artificial Intelligence # Signal Processing

Federated Learning and GNNs: A New Way to Assess Stroke Severity

Combining federated learning and GNNs for improved stroke assessment while ensuring patient privacy.

Andrea Protani, Lorenzo Giusti, Albert Sund Aillet, Simona Sacco, Paolo Manganotti, Lucio Marinelli, Diogo Reis Santos, Pierpaolo Brutti, Pietro Caliandro, Luigi Serio

― 6 min read


Innovative Stroke Innovative Stroke Assessment Framework privacy and prediction accuracy. Federated learning and GNNs enhance
Table of Contents

In the world of healthcare, making the right call can be a matter of life or death. Imagine sitting in a doctor's office, and the doctor has a magic crystal ball that shows the condition of your health. Wouldn't that be great? Well, while we don't have crystal balls, we do have machine learning (ML), a tool that's stepping up in the game of predicting health issues, like strokes. But here's the catch: using patient data to train these ML models can raise eyebrows about privacy and safety. So, what do we do? Enter Federated Learning, a superhero in the data privacy world that allows hospitals to work together on models without sharing sensitive patient data. Let's dive into how this works with something called Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) to predict stroke severity from brain signals.

What is Federated Learning?

Federated learning is like a group project, but instead of sharing your answers with the whole class, everyone keeps their answers private. In this case, multiple hospitals can train a shared model while keeping their patient data safe and sound. They send the results of their training to a central hub, which combines their knowledge without ever seeing the actual data. This way, they still get to collaborate and make powerful predictions about patient health.

Graph Neural Networks Explained

Now, let’s talk about GNNs. Think of GNNs as a social network for brain cells. Just like users in a social network, neurons connect with each other. A GNN can learn from these connections, helping to understand how brain signals change after a stroke. This is crucial because strokes can disrupt the usual chatter among neurons, and we need to figure out just how much that chatter has been affected.

Why Use EEG Data?

When looking into strokes, scientists often turn to electroencephalography (EEG), a method that picks up electrical activity in the brain. It’s like listening in on a conversation. EEG helps doctors see how brain regions communicate. So, by using this data along with our fancy GNNs in a federated learning setup, we can develop a way to assess stroke severity without ever compromising patient privacy.

The Dataset and How We Process It

For this project, a group of hospitals got together and shared their EEG recordings from 72 patients. These recordings came from patients who were admitted due to strokes. During their stay, doctors collected brain signals while the patients were at rest. After gathering the data, each hospital processed it using the same standardized methods to ensure everything would be comparable. This consistency is key in making sure the final results are accurate.

The NIH Stroke Scale: A Vital Tool

When it comes to measuring stroke severity, the NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS) is the go-to tool. It’s a handy checklist that allows healthcare providers to rate how badly a stroke has affected a patient’s brain function. The NIHSS ranges from 0 (no impairment) to 42 (very severe impairment). This scale helps guide treatment decisions, making it an essential part of stroke assessments.

The Challenges of EEG Data

EEG data is incredibly useful, but it’s not without its challenges. Because brain signals can be noisy and messy, it can be tricky to extract meaningful patterns. Traditional models didn’t capture the complexity of these connections very well. That's where our GNNs step in, bringing the ability to handle the unique structure of EEG data and capturing the intricate relationships among neural oscillations.

What We Did

With federated learning and GNNs at our disposal, we set out to predict stroke severity using the NIHSS from EEG data. This involved taking brain activity patterns and turning them into a graphical representation that the GNN can understand. We even enhanced our model with a technique called masked self-attention, which helps the model focus on the most important connections in the brain.

Why We Used EdgeSHAP

Predicting stroke severity is only half the battle. Doctors need to know why the model predicted what it did. This is where EdgeSHAP comes into play. By using EdgeSHAP, we can explain the contributions of different neural connections to the predictions, helping doctors understand the brain’s inner workings. This insight is crucial for tailoring treatment plans to individual patients based on specific brain activity patterns.

How We Tested It

To put our model to the test, we collected EEG recordings from four different hospitals, creating a diverse and rich dataset. We trained our models using different setups, including federated learning with both FedAvg and SCAFFOLD algorithms. Each hospital processed its data locally, sent updates to a central server, and together they created a robust shared model while keeping patient data private.

The Results

Our results showed that the GNN model we developed could predict stroke severity quite accurately, achieving a mean absolute error (MAE) of 3.23. That's pretty close to the 3.0 error rate often achieved by human experts. Furthermore, our federated approach allowed us to maintain patient privacy while still producing reliable results.

The Power of Collaborative Learning

The project demonstrated that federated learning is not just a theoretical concept; it's a practical solution for real-world healthcare problems. By allowing hospitals to collaborate without sharing sensitive data, they can collectively create more robust models. This method preserves privacy while providing the benefits of shared learning.

Explaining Model Decisions

With the help of EdgeSHAP, we can visualize and interpret the model's decisions. This means clinicians can see which connections in the brain are most important for predicting stroke severity. By visualizing these "important" edges, doctors gain insights that can lead to better treatment strategies aimed at specific areas of the brain.

The Broader Impact

This federated learning framework holds great promise not just for stroke assessments but also for a wide variety of neurological conditions. By fostering collaboration among hospitals and researchers, we can accelerate improvements in patient care without compromising privacy. Imagine a future where hospitals can learn from each other, leading to better treatment for conditions like Alzheimer's or epilepsy, all while protecting patient data.

Limitations and Future Work

While our approach is promising, it does have its limitations. The sample size of 72 patients is relatively small. More extensive studies involving diverse populations will be needed to validate the effectiveness of our model. Additionally, variability in data collection and processing across different hospitals might pose challenges when scaling up. Future work will focus on expanding data sizes and exploring how to standardize procedures across institutions.

Conclusion

To sum it up, we've developed a federated learning framework that uses GNNs for stroke assessment, demonstrating how technology can help solve real healthcare problems while respecting patient privacy. By effectively predicting stroke severity and offering explanations for our model's predictions, we aim to enhance clinical decision-making. As we look to the future, there’s a world of potential for similar approaches to address various healthcare needs, bringing together the best of technology and compassion in medicine. So, while we may not have crystal balls just yet, with tools like federated learning and GNNs, we're getting pretty close to predicting health problems before they even happen.

Original Source

Title: Federated GNNs for EEG-Based Stroke Assessment

Abstract: Machine learning (ML) has the potential to become an essential tool in supporting clinical decision-making processes, offering enhanced diagnostic capabilities and personalized treatment plans. However, outsourcing medical records to train ML models using patient data raises legal, privacy, and security concerns. Federated learning has emerged as a promising paradigm for collaborative ML, meeting healthcare institutions' requirements for robust models without sharing sensitive data and compromising patient privacy. This study proposes a novel method that combines federated learning (FL) and Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) to predict stroke severity using electroencephalography (EEG) signals across multiple medical institutions. Our approach enables multiple hospitals to jointly train a shared GNN model on their local EEG data without exchanging patient information. Specifically, we address a regression problem by predicting the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), a key indicator of stroke severity. The proposed model leverages a masked self-attention mechanism to capture salient brain connectivity patterns and employs EdgeSHAP to provide post-hoc explanations of the neurological states after a stroke. We evaluated our method on EEG recordings from four institutions, achieving a mean absolute error (MAE) of 3.23 in predicting NIHSS, close to the average error made by human experts (MAE $\approx$ 3.0). This demonstrates the method's effectiveness in providing accurate and explainable predictions while maintaining data privacy.

Authors: Andrea Protani, Lorenzo Giusti, Albert Sund Aillet, Simona Sacco, Paolo Manganotti, Lucio Marinelli, Diogo Reis Santos, Pierpaolo Brutti, Pietro Caliandro, Luigi Serio

Last Update: 2024-12-07 00:00:00

Language: English

Source URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.02286

Source PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2411.02286

Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.

Thank you to arxiv for use of its open access interoperability.

Similar Articles