Simple Science

Cutting edge science explained simply

# Health Sciences # Neurology

Advancements in Neurodegenerative Disease Detection

New methods aim to improve early detection of Alzheimer's and Parkinson's diseases.

Faraz Faghri, A. Dadu, M. Ta, N. J. Tustison, A. Daneshmand, K. Marek, A. B. Singleton, R. H. Campbell, M. A. Nalls, H. Iwaki, B. Avants

― 6 min read


AI in Neurodegenerative AI in Neurodegenerative Research Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases. Machine learning boosts detection of
Table of Contents

Neurodegeneration describes a gradual decline in the health and function of nerve cells or neurons in the brain. This can lead to various disorders, with Alzheimer’s disease and Parkinson’s disease being the most common. Both of these conditions impact millions of people around the world. Alzheimer’s disease primarily affects memory and cognition, while Parkinson’s disease mainly impacts movement and motor skills. However, both conditions affect not just the brain but also the body.

The Complexity of Disorders

Both Alzheimer’s disease and Parkinson’s disease show a wide range of symptoms that can differ significantly from person to person. This variability can depend on factors such as a person's education level, age when symptoms start, how quickly the disease progresses, and the mix of motor and non-motor symptoms present. Because of this diversity, we can no longer classify these diseases simply into two separate groups. Instead, they are seen as part of a spectrum of disorders. Therefore, new methods are needed to assess likelihood and risk for these diseases.

The Importance of Early Detection

Detecting neurodegenerative diseases early is crucial. Often, these diseases have a long phase where no symptoms are present. Identifying the disease during this stage may improve the effectiveness of treatments aimed at slowing progression. Changes in brain structure might already be happening before any symptoms show up. Additionally, genetic factors significantly influence the risk of developing Alzheimer’s or Parkinson’s disease, with numerous genetic markers identified.

Leveraging Machine Learning

Machine learning has been a game-changer in analyzing brain scans and other complex data. For instance, techniques using brain images from MRI scans can help diagnose Alzheimer's Disease accurately after symptoms appear. They can also predict the transition from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer’s disease even before the condition is clinically diagnosed. These methods have mostly focused on distinguishing between healthy individuals and those with the diseases rather than exploring a more detailed spectrum of disease severity.

Despite the progress, there have been limitations in validating findings using external datasets. While MRI scans are popular for studying Alzheimer’s disease, their use for Parkinson’s disease is less common, as more detailed features are necessary to analyze the brain area most affected in Parkinson’s, known as the substantia nigra.

Developing New Metrics

By combining MRI imaging with genetic risk data, researchers aim to create better predictions regarding the development or monitoring of these diseases. This study explores how machine learning can help to create quantitative measures of Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease from brain scans. It also examines how these new measures may relate to clinical results both before and after diagnosis.

The objective is to understand how imaging scores, alongside genetic information, can help predict the likelihood of someone developing these diseases later in life. After a diagnosis, researchers will investigate how imaging scores might track the disease's progress, using established clinical tests as benchmarks.

Research Methodology

This research included specific groups of patients diagnosed with either Alzheimer’s or Parkinson’s disease, as well as a larger external database. Detailed brain imaging data was collected and analyzed to develop classification models that could determine disease risk based on these images.

In the case of Alzheimer’s disease, a dataset called the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative was utilized, including over 700 people diagnosed with dementia and about 900 healthy individuals. For Parkinson’s disease, the study used another data group with over 300 patients diagnosed and around 140 healthy individuals. Furthermore, a large database, the UK Biobank, was also examined, which included imaging data from over 42,000 participants across various backgrounds.

Researchers employed multiple machine learning techniques to maximize the predictive performance of the classification model. They also carefully evaluated how these imaging scores related to established clinical benchmarks, which can help determine the severity of each condition.

Key Findings

Imaging Scores and Disease Risk

The study produced compelling results, showing that imaging scores could predict risks associated with developing Alzheimer’s or Parkinson’s disease. These scores are closely tied to changes observed in brain structure. For instance, individuals with higher imaging scores exhibited a greater likelihood of being diagnosed with dementia or Parkinson's Disease.

The importance of imaging scores was evident, with findings suggesting that those in the highest risk quartiles had significantly worse outcomes compared to those in lower quartiles. Such scores can also be useful for identifying individuals transitioning from mild cognitive impairment to dementia.

Classification Model Performance

The machine learning models developed during the study demonstrated they could effectively differentiate between healthy individuals and those with dementia. For Alzheimer's disease, the model had a high accuracy rate, while the performance for Parkinson's disease was more modest but still noteworthy.

Clinical Applications

The new imaging scores were associated with standard clinical assessments and biomarkers of disease progression. For Alzheimer's disease, a strong connection was noted with well-recognized clinical tests like the Montreal Cognitive Assessment and the Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale. While associations for Parkinson’s disease scores were less robust, they still highlighted the potential for using imaging scores in clinical contexts.

Overall, these findings indicate that utilizing MRI to generate disease scores could play a significant role in pre-diagnosis and ongoing monitoring of neurodegenerative diseases.

Future Prospects

The study highlights the need for integrating various types of data to enhance disease detection and treatment. While imaging scores offer valuable insights, they are just one piece of the puzzle. Including behavioral, clinical, and genetic data can provide a more comprehensive understanding of each patient’s condition.

As technology advances and brain imaging becomes more widespread and affordable, the prospects for tracking brain health in high-risk populations improve. These imaging scores could facilitate early intervention and enhance the effectiveness of clinical trials by ensuring participants are more homogeneous in terms of disease progression.

Conclusion

The study emphasizes the potential for machine learning to create new ways to assess neurodegenerative diseases using brain imaging data. Recognizing that these disorders are complex and multifaceted, researchers advocate for utilizing multiple types of data to improve detection and outcomes.

By developing objective measures, this work lays the groundwork for future research and practical applications in clinical settings. Ultimately, combining various data sources will provide a more holistic approach in addressing the challenges of Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases, ultimately benefiting patients, researchers, and the broader healthcare system.

Original Source

Title: Prediction, prognosis and monitoring of neurodegeneration at biobank-scale via machine learning and imaging

Abstract: BackgroundAlzheimers disease and related dementias (ADRD) and Parkinsons disease (PD) are the most common neurodegenerative conditions. These central nervous system disorders impact both the structure and function of the brain and may lead to imaging changes that precede symptoms. Patients with ADRD or PD have long asymptomatic phases that exhibit significant heterogeneity. Hence, quantitative measures that can provide early disease indicators are necessary to improve patient stratification, clinical care, and clinical trial design. This work uses machine learning techniques to derive such a quantitative marker from T1-weighted (T1w) brain Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MethodsIn this retrospective study, we developed machine learning (ML) based disease-specific scores based on T1w brain MRI utilizing Parkinsons Disease Progression Marker Initiative (PPMI) and Alzheimers Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) cohorts. We evaluated the potential of ML-based scores for early diagnosis, prognosis, and monitoring of ADRD and PD in an independent large-scale population-based longitudinal cohort, UK Biobank. Findings1,826 dementia images from 731 participants, 3,161 healthy control images from 925 participants from the ADNI cohort, 684 PD images from 319 participants, and 232 healthy control images from 145 participants from the PPMI cohort were used to train machine learning models. The classification performance is 0.94 [95% CI: 0.93-0.96] area under the ROC Curve (AUC) for ADRD detection and 0.63 [95% CI: 0.57-0.71] for PD detection using 790 extracted structural brain features. The most predictive regions include the hippocampus and temporal brain regions in ADRD and the substantia nigra in PD. The normalized ML models probabilistic output (ADRD and PD imaging scores) was evaluated on 42,835 participants with imaging data from the UK Biobank. There are 66 cases for ADRD and 40 PD cases whose T1 brain MRI is available during pre-diagnostic phases. For diagnosis occurrence events within 5 years, the integrated survival model achieves a time-dependent AUC of 0.86 [95% CI: 0.80-0.92] for dementia and 0.89 [95% CI: 0.85-0.94] for PD. ADRD imaging score is strongly associated with dementia-free survival (hazard ratio (HR) 1.76 [95% CI: 1.50-2.05] per S.D. of imaging score), and PD imaging score shows association with PD-free survival (hazard ratio 2.33 [95% CI: 1.55-3.50]) in our integrated model. HR and prevalence increased stepwise over imaging score quartiles for PD, demonstrating heterogeneity. As a proxy for diagnosis, we validated AD/PD polygenic risk scores of 42,835 subjects against the imaging scores, showing a highly significant association after adjusting for covariates. In both the PPMI and ADNI cohorts, the scores are associated with clinical assessments, including the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Alzheimers Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale (ADAS-Cog), and pathological markers, which include amyloid and tau. Finally, imaging scores are associated with polygenic risk scores for multiple diseases. Our results suggest that we can use imaging scores to assess the genetic architecture of such disorders in the future. InterpretationOur study demonstrates the use of quantitative markers generated using machine learning techniques for ADRD and PD. We show that disease probability scores obtained from brain structural features are useful for early detection, prognosis prediction, and monitoring disease progression. To facilitate community engagement and external tests of model utility, an interactive app to explore summary level data from this study and dive into external data can be found here https://ndds-brainimaging-ml.streamlit.app. As far as we know, this is the first publicly available cloud-based MRI prediction application. FundingUS National Institute on Aging, and US National Institutes of Health. Research in contextO_ST_ABSEvidence before this studyC_ST_ABSWe searched PubMed for articles published in English from database inception to May 11, 2023, about the use of machine learning on brain imaging data for Alzheimers disease (AD), dementia, and Parkinsons disease (PD) populations. We used search terms "machine learning" AND "brain imaging" AND "neurodegenerative disorders" AND "quantitative biomarkers". The search identified 25 studies. Most of these studies are focused on Alzheimers disease. They use machine learning to predict conversion from mild cognitive impairment to dementia or to build a classification tool. Many studies also focused on positron emission tomography (PET) images rather than cost-effective T1w MRI images in their analysis. None of the studies have focused on detecting disease during the asymptomatic phase of dementia and PD. Identified studies are limited in sample size (order of hundred samples) and extracted features. The assessments of the clinical utility of machine learning models predicted disease probabilities are scarce. Significantly, no attempts were made to validate the algorithm in an external cohort. In this work, we have limited our review to scientific studies that are transparent and reproducible, including those that provide code and validate their findings on a reasonable sample size. Added value of this studyThis study developed machine learning based quantitative scores to measure the risk, severity, and prognosis of Alzheimers disease and related dementias (ADRD) and Parkinsons disease (PD) using brain imaging data. Neurodegenerative disorders affect multiple body functions and exhibit significant etiology and clinical presentation variation. Patients with these conditions may experience prolonged asymptomatic periods. Disease-modifying therapies are most effective during the early asymptomatic stage of the disease, making early intervention a crucial factor. However, the lack of biomarkers for early diagnosis and disease progression monitoring remains a significant obstacle to achieving this goal. We leveraged disease-specific cohorts ADNI (1,826 images from 731 dementia participants) and PPMI (684 images from 329 PD participants) to develop a machine learning classifier for AD and PD detection using T1w brain imaging data. We obtain disease-specific imaging scores from these trained models using the normalized disease probability score. In a sizable external biobank, UK Biobank (42,835 participants), we found these scores show strong predictive power in determining the occurrence of PD or dementia during a 5-year followup. The occurrence of PD increased stepwise over ascending imaging score quantiles representing heterogeneity within the PD population. Imaging scores are also associated with pathological and clinical assessment measures. Our study indicates this could be a single numeric indicator representing disease-specific abnormality in T1w brain imaging modality. The association of imaging scores with the polygenic risk score of related disorders implies the genetic basis of these scores. We also identified top brain regions associated with dementia and Parkinsons disease using feature interpretation tools. Implications of all the available evidenceThe findings should improve our ability to create practical passive surveillance plans for individuals with a heightened risk of occurrence of neurodegenerative disease. We have shown that imaging scores complement other risk factors, such as age and polygenic risk scores for early detection. The integrated model could serve as a tool for early interventions and study enrollment. Understanding the genetic basis of imaging scores can provide valuable insights into the biology of neurodegenerative disorders. Additionally, these high-accuracy models able to facilitate accurate early detection at the biobank scale can empower precision medicine trial recruitment strategies as well as paths of care for the future. We have included the development of an interactive web server (https://ndds-brainimaging-ml.streamlit.app) that empowers the community to process their own data based on our models and explore the utility and applicability of these findings for themselves. Users can easily upload a Nifti or DICOM file containing their MRI image, and we handle the entire pre-processing and prediction process. All computations are performed on the Google Cloud Platform. In addition, we provide an interpretation of the ML prediction highlighting areas of the brain that have contributed to the decision and a what-if-analysis tool where users explore different scenarios and their effect on prediction.

Authors: Faraz Faghri, A. Dadu, M. Ta, N. J. Tustison, A. Daneshmand, K. Marek, A. B. Singleton, R. H. Campbell, M. A. Nalls, H. Iwaki, B. Avants

Last Update: 2024-10-28 00:00:00

Language: English

Source URL: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.10.27.24316215

Source PDF: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.10.27.24316215.full.pdf

Licence: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.

Thank you to medrxiv for use of its open access interoperability.

More from authors

Similar Articles