Simple Science

Cutting edge science explained simply

# Computer Science # Human-Computer Interaction # Robotics

Why We Overshoot When Turning Knobs

A look into the quirks of turning knobs without seeing.

Kathrin Krieger, Yuri De Pra, Helge Ritter, Alexandra Moringen

― 5 min read


The Knob Turning Dilemma The Knob Turning Dilemma Exploring why we often twist too far.
Table of Contents

Have you ever had a go at turning a rotary knob without looking? It sounds simple, right? Just grab it, twist it, and you’re done. But wait – things might not go as you expect. When we turn knobs without visuals, like when blindfolded, it turns out we often rotate a bit too much. The question is: why do we tend to overshoot our target? This article digs into the movements of our hands and arms during haptic rotation tasks to find out what’s really behind this oversight.

Understanding Haptic Rotation

Haptic rotation is a fancy term for turning a knob using touch alone. Imagine trying to adjust your oven temperature without being able to see the dial. You might think you’re just about right, but in reality, you could be way off. For instance, if the goal is to rotate a knob to 90 degrees, people can often overshoot it by a fair bit, even when they think they’re doing it correctly.

This isn't just a personal quirk; it happens to a lot of folks, whether they’re healthy or recovering from an injury. The urge to twist a little too far can become an amusing challenge. This article takes a closer look at the upper limb and hand movements that contribute to this funny little mishap.

The Experiment Setup

To figure out what's going on, a group of volunteers took part in a series of hands-on experiments. Eighteen brave souls, all seeing and without any hand difficulties, were blindfolded and given the task of rotating a knob. They had to do it at specific angles, like 0, 20, 45, and 90 degrees. Each person repeated the tasks several times, trying out different hand positions on the knob. The aim? To measure how far they would overshoot.

Before the fun began, participants were given a crash course on the task at hand. Reflective markers were placed on their arms and hands so that researchers could track their movement. With the help of some high-tech cameras, the whole process was recorded and analyzed.

What Do We Mean by Overshooting?

So, what exactly does overshooting mean? Picture this: you’re trying to get the temperature dial for your oven to 90 degrees. You twist, and instead of landing perfectly on 90, you wind up at 102 degrees. Oops! It’s that extra rotation that’s called overshooting.

The funny part is how much people tend to overshoot varies from one experiment to another. In some trials, folks would end up rotating an average of 62 degrees too far, while in others, the overshoot might be just 13 degrees. It’s as if everyone has a personal overshooting badge they’re trying to earn.

The Role of the Wrist and Fingers

Through the experiments, it became clear that our wrist and fingers play a big part in why we overshoot. It seems like our wrist movement is influenced by a kind of internal compass – a personal judgment of where we are in space. When rotating a knob, we often think that our hand is moving in one way, but our wrist might be working against that idea, leading to those extra twists and turns.

Similarly, the way our fingers move is crucial. When we grab the knob, we don’t just turn it in one motion. Instead, our fingers may roll over the surface of the knob, which changes the contact point. This means the knob turns more than we realize, and we end up adding extra degrees to the rotation.

Findings from the Study

The study showed some interesting insights into our hand movements:

  1. Wrist Bias: The wrist joint was found to be a major contributor to overshooting. It seems our hands operate using a hand-centered viewpoint, causing us to misjudge the angle.

  2. Finger Movements: Both the thumb and index finger played significant roles too. Sideways movements and bending at the wrong joints caused a rollercoaster effect, pushing the knob beyond its target.

  3. Consistent Mistakes: Surprisingly, even though participants made overshooting mistakes, they did it consistently. Every time they performed the task, the pattern held. It’s almost like a badge of honor!

  4. Shape Matters: The shape of the rotary knob also had a bearing on accuracy. A flat-knob design led to fewer mistakes, while a rounded knob was more challenging. Go figure!

The Everyday Relevance

Why should anyone care about this research? Well, plenty of people use rotary knobs every day – from cooking appliances to car dashboards. Understanding how people operate these knobs can help improve designs, especially for those with limited hand function, like stroke patients. If we can create better-handle knobs, life might just be a little easier for everyone.

Moving Forward

As it stands, the research highlights that our movements are influenced by a variety of factors. The mechanisms behind our overshooting tendencies are still a bit of a mystery, but researchers are optimistic. Future studies might look into how using multiple fingers changes the way we overshoot, and if limiting movement could lead to better accuracy.

In the end, the dance of our hands with rotary knobs continues to be an entertaining mystery. Next time you’re adjusting a dial, remember that you might be overshooting for reasons you didn’t even consider!

Original Source

Title: Motion Analysis of Upper Limb and Hand in a Haptic Rotation Task

Abstract: Humans seem to have a bias to overshoot when rotating a rotary knob blindfolded around a specified target angle (i.e. during haptic rotation). Whereas some influence factors that strengthen or weaken such an effect are already known, the underlying reasons for the overshoot are still unknown. This work approaches the topic of haptic rotations by analyzing a detailed recording of the movement. We propose an experimental framework and an approach to investigate which upper limb and hand joint movements contribute significantly to a haptic rotation task and to the angle overshoot based on the acquired data. With stepwise regression with backward elimination, we analyze a rotation around 90 degrees counterclockwise with two fingers under different grasping orientations. Our results showed that the wrist joint, the sideways finger movement in the proximal joints, and the distal finger joints contributed significantly to overshooting. This suggests that two phenomena are behind the overshooting: 1) The significant contribution of the wrist joint indicates a bias of a hand-centered egocentric reference frame. 2) Significant contribution of the finger joints indicates a rolling of the fingertips over the rotary knob surface and, thus, a change of contact point for which probably the human does not compensate.

Authors: Kathrin Krieger, Yuri De Pra, Helge Ritter, Alexandra Moringen

Last Update: 2024-11-17 00:00:00

Language: English

Source URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.12765

Source PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2411.12765

Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.

Thank you to arxiv for use of its open access interoperability.

Similar Articles