Building Better AI Through Social Learning
Exploring how AI can adapt social dynamics to work better with humans.
Michael S. Harré, Jaime Ruiz-Serra, Catherine Drysdale
― 6 min read
Table of Contents
Artificial intelligence (AI) is like a bunch of kids on a playground trying to play a game together. Each kid has their own toys and skills, but to win, they need to work as a team. The big question is how these kids (or AI agents) can figure out how to play nicely together when no single one can win the game alone.
One important idea is to make sure these AI agents communicate and behave in ways that align with how we humans think and interact. Just like how we need to respect our friends during a game, AI should respect our cognitive processes too. This means both AI and humans need to understand each other better.
Collective Intelligence and Nature
So, what does teamwork look like in nature? Think about ants. Ants have been working together for millions of years. They have their own roles, like little workers and leaders, which helps them get things done more efficiently. When faced with a problem, such as a nasty disease, they can adapt their behavior and even change their living arrangements to protect the colony.
On the other hand, in the human brain, neurons (the brain's messaging cells) work together but have a more rigid structure. Unlike ants, neurons can't really ‘invite’ new friends; their Connections are pretty much set in stone. However, ants can easily form new connections, adjusting their teamwork based on who joins in.
Connecting with Nature’s Playbook
Now let’s think about how species in nature relate to each other. It’s like a game of musical chairs where each plant or animal chooses the best spot that suits them. This choice is influenced by what they need and how they fit into their surroundings. If a plant needs sunlight, it will seek a sunny place. If it can't find one, it might adjust itself to fit better into the area.
These interactions are also about Communication. Think of it like sending emojis to your friends – it gives context to how you feel and what you want. In nature, creatures use their own signals to convey messages about available resources or dangers, shaping their community.
Humans and Their Social Webs
When we look at human Social Networks, we see something similar. ToM, or Theory Of Mind, is our ability to think about what someone else is feeling or thinking. It’s the reason why we don’t just blurt out embarrassing secrets at a party.
Children develop this skill as they learn to communicate better. There’s this funny thing where languages help us express our thoughts and understand others. Imagine a child learning to say, "Oops! I didn’t mean to," which shows understanding of making mistakes. This skill can help them relate better to their friends.
Making Connections
Humans use this theory of mind to navigate social situations. Just like how ants can adapt their behaviors, people also rework connections within their social circles. When new people join a group, it’s not just a random mix. Instead, individuals change how they relate to each other to fit the newcomer in or, sometimes, keep them out. Doing this takes some brainpower and a good sense of timing.
The Role of Language in Social Interaction
Language is a fantastic tool in this process. It allows us to map out our social world. Just like how someone might use a GPS to find the best route, people use language to figure out their relationships with others. Studies show that when people talk about their feelings and thoughts, they’re better at understanding how others feel too.
This connection between language and ToM creates a toolbox of sorts for us. It’s how we figure out how to work together towards common goals, improving efficiency and relationships in the process.
What About AI?
Now, where does AI fit into this picture? Well, researchers are exploring ways to teach AI about human social interactions. One idea is something called inverse reinforcement learning, which is a fancy way of saying AI can try to guess what other agents want by observing their actions.
But here’s the catch – the AI often misses the bigger picture of the social network it’s operating in. Large Language Models (LLMs), another popular tool in AI, can mimic some reasoning skills. But they still struggle with tricky social situations and unpredictability.
So far, no AI has fully mastered the depth of understanding that even a toddler has when navigating a social group. Humans have learned to manipulate their connections and direct others, a skill that AI is still working on.
The Challenges of Teaching AI
The challenge lies in getting AI to understand human-like social structures. Think of it like trying to teach a cat to behave like a dog – it’s just not in their nature. For AI to be able to mingle with our social circles effectively, it will need to develop skills to influence relationships just as humans do.
A recent study showed that systems of AI can learn to work together, much like how a group of kids might share toys to solve a puzzle. But, just like kids playing together, AI must also learn to adapt and remember what works based on past experiences.
The Future Ahead
As we look ahead, there remains a mountain of possibilities for advancing AI's understanding of social dynamics. There are many paths to explore, but each step must be taken with care. It’s essential to ensure we don't mistakenly apply human terms to AI in ways that lead to misunderstanding.
In conclusion, as we develop AI, we must consider how these machines relate to us and each other. By studying how humans and nature have formed complex networks, we can create smarter, more adaptable AI systems. This can bridge the gap and foster better communication, efficiency, and understanding between humans and artificial beings.
So, let’s keep building our playground together, with each of us adapting and growing, learning from each other in the process. With a little humor and humility, we can hope for a bright future where AI and humans work hand in hand, or at least side by side, as they learn to navigate this chaotic yet fascinating social world.
Title: Artificial Theory of Mind and Self-Guided Social Organisation
Abstract: One of the challenges artificial intelligence (AI) faces is how a collection of agents coordinate their behaviour to achieve goals that are not reachable by any single agent. In a recent article by Ozmen et al this was framed as one of six grand challenges: That AI needs to respect human cognitive processes at the human-AI interaction frontier. We suggest that this extends to the AI-AI frontier and that it should also reflect human psychology, as it is the only successful framework we have from which to build out. In this extended abstract we first make the case for collective intelligence in a general setting, drawing on recent work from single neuron complexity in neural networks and ant network adaptability in ant colonies. From there we introduce how species relate to one another in an ecological network via niche selection, niche choice, and niche conformity with the aim of forming an analogy with human social network development as new agents join together and coordinate. From there we show how our social structures are influenced by our neuro-physiology, our psychology, and our language. This emphasises how individual people within a social network influence the structure and performance of that network in complex tasks, and that cognitive faculties such as Theory of Mind play a central role. We finish by discussing the current state of the art in AI and where there is potential for further development of a socially embodied collective artificial intelligence that is capable of guiding its own social structures.
Authors: Michael S. Harré, Jaime Ruiz-Serra, Catherine Drysdale
Last Update: 2024-11-13 00:00:00
Language: English
Source URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.09169
Source PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2411.09169
Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.
Thank you to arxiv for use of its open access interoperability.