Fighting Back Against Antimicrobial Resistance
New strategies using machine learning aim to combat rising antibiotic resistance.
Yojana Gadiya, Olga Genilloud, Ursula Bilitewski, Mark Brönstrup, Leonie von Berlin, Marie Attwood, Philip Gribbon, Andrea Zaliani
― 6 min read
Table of Contents
- The Rise of Antibiotic Resistance
- The Need for Change
- Using Machine Learning in Drug Discovery
- Understanding Bacterial Resistance
- The AntiMicrobial Knowledge Graph (AntiMicrobial-KG)
- The Structure of the AntiMicrobial-KG
- Chemical Diversity
- The Quest for Better Antibiotics
- Evaluating the Models
- The Winning Model
- Screening External Libraries
- Results of Predictions
- Cost-Effectiveness
- Limitations of Current Approaches
- Future Directions
- The Path Ahead
- Conclusion
- Original Source
- Reference Links
Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR) is becoming a significant threat to public health around the world. It’s like when you try to fix your old toaster, and no matter what you do, it just won’t toast your bread anymore. In the case of AMR, the "toaster" is our antibiotics, which are losing their ability to fight off bacterial infections. As more bacteria become resistant to common antibiotics, it becomes harder to treat everyday infections. This problem is growing, and experts predict it could lead to millions of deaths each year if not addressed. So, how can we fix this “toaster”?
The Rise of Antibiotic Resistance
Antibiotics were discovered to treat bacterial infections, and they have saved countless lives. However, over the years, using these important medicines too much and inappropriately has led to some bacteria figuring out how to withstand them. It’s like giving a kid too much candy; eventually, they get used to it and want something more! Currently, studies indicate that AMR is not just a local issue; it’s a global crisis. Each year, it is estimated that millions of people die because of infections caused by resistant bacteria.
The Need for Change
To combat AMR, researchers must find new ways to develop effective medications. This is an urgent necessity as the traditional methods of drug discovery can take years, and many potential new drugs simply do not make it to market. Delays in introducing newer antibiotics mean the bacteria have more time to evolve, setting us back even further. Thankfully, there's a new hero in town: Machine Learning (ML). This technology promises to make the drug discovery process quicker and more efficient.
Using Machine Learning in Drug Discovery
Imagine having a friend who remembers everything about every movie you’ve ever watched and can recommend what to watch next based on that. ML works in a somewhat similar manner, using data to identify patterns and make predictions. By analyzing vast amounts of information on existing antibacterial Compounds and their effectiveness, these algorithms can help identify new potential drugs faster than traditional methods.
Understanding Bacterial Resistance
To create effective drugs, it’s crucial to understand how bacteria resist treatment. This knowledge helps researchers develop strategies to outsmart these resilient bugs. In hospitals, advanced techniques like whole-genome sequencing are being used to quickly identify bacterial resistance. It’s like having a super-high-tech lab that can tell you who your bacterial enemy is before they even strike!
The AntiMicrobial Knowledge Graph (AntiMicrobial-KG)
To tackle AMR, a large collection of data known as the AntiMicrobial-KG has been developed. This database includes information on various Chemicals and their effectiveness against many bacteria. Think of it as a huge library where each book tells a different story of how a chemical interacts with bacteria and fungi.
The AntiMicrobial-KG collects data from multiple public resources and contains information from tens of thousands of different tests. Researchers use this data to understand which chemicals might be effective against specific bacteria. It includes a vast array of “characters” - the chemicals - and their interactions with different “plotlines” - the bacteria.
The Structure of the AntiMicrobial-KG
The AntiMicrobial-KG uses nodes and edges to represent different entities and their relationships, similar to how a social network works. In this case:
- Nodes represent chemicals and bacteria.
- Edges represent activities, showing which chemicals are effective against which bacteria.
This structure allows scientists to query specific interactions in a systematic way, making it easier to spot trends and develop new treatments.
Chemical Diversity
The types of chemicals in the AntiMicrobial-KG are numerous. Some of these compounds have unique structures that allow them to be highly effective against bacteria. Researchers analyzed this diversity by looking at structural features of the chemicals. What they found was that some chemical structures, like Michael acceptors, were more common in effective compounds.
The Quest for Better Antibiotics
The ultimate goal is to use the insights gained from the AntiMicrobial-KG and machine learning models to identify new antibiotics. Researchers have already begun training machine learning models with data from the AntiMicrobial-KG, using various techniques to see which ones can best predict the activity of potential new drugs.
Evaluating the Models
Multiple machine learning models were tested to determine which ones provided the best predictions. Different types of models were evaluated, including popular algorithms like Random Forests and XGBoost.
The Winning Model
After evaluating several models, the Random Forest algorithm combined with a specific type of chemical representation known as the MHFP6 fingerprint emerged as the most accurate. This model outperformed others in accurately predicting which compounds might be effective against specific bacteria.
Screening External Libraries
Once the best model was identified, it was tested against external libraries containing thousands of compounds. Researchers ran these compounds through the model to see which ones might work against various pathogens.
Results of Predictions
The model’s predictions classified many compounds as either active or inactive against different bacterial strains. Interestingly, the model often found hits that were then confirmed through laboratory testing. This step is crucial as it directly connects the computational predictions with real-life applications.
Cost-Effectiveness
One of the significant advantages of using machine learning in drug discovery is cost savings. By predicting which compounds might be effective before testing them in the lab, researchers can significantly reduce the number of compounds they need to evaluate. This is much like shopping with a list instead of wandering the aisles aimlessly - you end up spending less time and money!
Limitations of Current Approaches
Despite the advancements, there are still challenges. One major issue is that the existing models often consider a compound only active against one type of bacteria. In reality, some compounds might work against multiple types of pathogens. Another limitation is that the predictions rely heavily on the data they were trained on. If the dataset lacks diversity, the model's predictions might not generalize well to new compounds.
Future Directions
Given the challenges posed by AMR, there’s an urgent need for continued innovation in drug discovery methods. It’s crucial to combine machine learning with other approaches, such as chemical biology, to create more robust predictions. The ongoing efforts to improve the AntiMicrobial-KG and similar databases will also help researchers better understand how to develop new antibiotics.
The Path Ahead
Finding effective ways to combat AMR will require creativity, collaboration, and persistence. Researchers must continue to pool resources, share knowledge, and employ advanced technologies to speed the development of new antibiotics.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the fight against antimicrobial resistance is akin to battling a monster that constantly evolves. Old weapons - our traditional antibiotics - are losing their potency, but new strategies, like machine learning, offer hope. By using advanced data analysis methods and focusing on the right chemicals, researchers may unlock new treatments in the ongoing battle against resistant bacteria. It’s a long road ahead, but with teamwork and a sprinkle of creativity, a solution might just be around the corner!
Title: Predicting antimicrobial class specificity of small molecules using machine learning
Abstract: Whilst the useful armory of antibiotic drugs is continually depleted due to the emergence of drug-resistant pathogens, the development of novel therapeutics has also slowed down. In the era of advanced computational methods, approaches like machine learning (ML) could be one potential solution to help reduce the high costs and complexity of antibiotic drug discovery and attract collaboration across organizations. In our work, we developed a large antimicrobial knowledge graph (AntiMicrobial-KG) as a repository for collecting and visualizing public in-vitro antibacterial assay. Utilizing this data, we build ML models to efficiently scan compound libraries to identify compounds with the potential to exhibit antimicrobial activity. Our strategy involved training seven classic ML models across six compound fingerprint representations, of which the Random Forest trained on the MHFP6 fingerprint outperformed, demonstrating an accuracy of 75.9% and Cohens Kappa score of 0.68. Finally, we illustrated the models applicability for predicting the antimicrobial properties of two small molecule screening libraries. Firstly, the EU-OpenScreen library was tested against a panel of Gram-positive, Gram-negative, and Fungal pathogens. Here, we unveiled that the model was able to correctly predict more than 30% of active compounds for Gram-positive, Gram-negative, and Fungal pathogens. Secondly, with the Enamine library, a commercially available HTS compound collection with claimed antibacterial properties, we predicted its antimicrobial activity and pathogen class specificity. These results may provide a means for accelerating research in AMR drug discovery efforts by carefully filtering out compounds from commercial libraries with lower chances of being active.
Authors: Yojana Gadiya, Olga Genilloud, Ursula Bilitewski, Mark Brönstrup, Leonie von Berlin, Marie Attwood, Philip Gribbon, Andrea Zaliani
Last Update: 2024-12-05 00:00:00
Language: English
Source URL: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.12.02.626313
Source PDF: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.12.02.626313.full.pdf
Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.
Thank you to biorxiv for use of its open access interoperability.
Reference Links
- https://amr-accelerator.eu/project/combine/
- https://db.co-add.org/
- https://www.ebi.ac.uk/chembl/
- https://npclassifier.ucsd.edu/
- https://www.rdkit.org/
- https://pycaret.org/
- https://optuna.org/
- https://enamine.net/compound-libraries/targeted-libraries/antibacterial-library
- https://ecbd.eu/
- https://scikit-learn.org
- https://imbalanced-learn.org
- https://pypi.org/project/treeinterpreter/
- https://neo4j.com/
- https://streamlit.io/
- https://serve.scilifelab.se/
- https://github.com/IMI-COMBINE/broad_spectrum_prediction
- https://zenodo.org/records/13868088
- https://antimicrobial-kg.serve.scilifelab.se/