Simple Science

Cutting edge science explained simply

# Computer Science # Human-Computer Interaction # Robotics

Drone Operations: Challenging the Status Quo

Research reveals pilot performance isn't solely affected by the number of drones.

Julie A. Adams, Christopher A. Sanchez, Vivek Mallampati, Joshua Bhagat Smith, Emily Burgess, Andrew Dassonville

― 7 min read


Drone Pilots: More Than Drone Pilots: More Than Just Control numerous drones in the air. Study shows pilots excel even with
Table of Contents

When it comes to flying Drones, you'd think having a ton of them up in the sky would be a lot for a human pilot to handle. Many believe that the more drones you have, the worse the pilot does at keeping control. This idea was around back when ground robots were the main topic. But recent developments in drone tech, especially those that can operate a bit on their own, suggest that this isn't necessarily the case.

In fact, some cool drone shows and delivery systems are showing us that with the right tech, pilots can manage a bunch of drones without breaking a sweat. So, a group of smart folks at Oregon State University teamed up with Wing to find out what really affects drone pilots' performance. They wanted to see if it’s just the number of drones, or if other things can mess with how well pilots do their jobs.

The Aim of the Study

This study breaks down into two main parts. The first part, or Phase I, is all about getting a baseline. Think of it like testing the waters before diving into the deep end. They looked at how pilots handle different situations, including when there are a lot of drones flying around, and what happens when weather gets tricky or when manned aircraft show up.

During this Phase I, the researchers ran pilots through a series of 60-minute trials. The tests were designed to see how pilots reacted in normal conditions, when a single manned aircraft flew nearby, and when there were more exciting challenges like bad weather. By the end of this phase, they wanted to find out if the number of drones, the number of drone Nests, or unexpected situations really changed how well pilots performed.

The Experimental Setup

In these experiments, there were 60-minute trials with different tasks for the pilots. They included times when the pilots had to monitor two different events: a single manned aircraft and a double encounter where two manned aircraft showed up at once. There were also tasks where bad weather hit. The pilots had to keep an eye on how many drones were actively flying and how many nests were in use.

But what did the pilots focus on during these tasks? Well, it turned out they mostly stared at the ADS-B display (which shows aircraft in the area) and the Wing user interface (the tool they use to control the drones). Interestingly, when bad weather was brewing, the pilots' gaze shifted more towards the weather data displayed.

Results of the Trials

They found that pilots stayed engaged with their tasks pretty well. Their awareness about the situation remained good, even when things got a bit more chaotic. There weren't any big changes in overall Workload, which is good news! Pilots were mainly looking at critical screens and gathering the information they needed to do their jobs.

Most importantly, the study showed that the common belief - that having more drones is bad for pilot performance - isn't entirely true. In fact, they suggested that other factors, not just the number of drones, could affect how well pilots keep things together in the air.

The Need for Better Data

One big takeaway from this study is that there isn’t enough solid data about what really affects pilot performance in drone operations. Most studies out there are too simplified and miss the mark. They mostly focus on subjective feelings and don’t give the full picture of what’s happening during the operation of these drones.

What they really need is objective data collected in real-world situations. This data could help inform regulations and create standards for safely scaling up drone operations in the skies. OSU and Wing are working together to figure out what pilot performance means when it comes to supervising delivery drones.

The Experiment Design

The design of this study was pretty neat. The main goal for Phase I was to gather solid data that could be compared later in the next phase. The experiments focused on how the number of drones, their nests, and unexpected events influenced the pilot's performance.

Each pilot completed two trials, and they were randomly assigned to different conditions. The conditions had differing numbers of nests and drones. They tested how well pilots managed their responsibilities while keeping track of everything happening in the airspace.

Participants and Tasks

The pilots were well-trained and certified, which meant they had the skills to operate the drones effectively. For each task, they had to juggle looking at different monitors that displayed various crucial information.

They used a simulation tool that allowed pilots to see how deliveries were done by drones in real time. The pilots didn’t just sit there; they had to respond to unexpected events like crewed aircraft flying nearby and adverse weather conditions.

Analysis of Workload and Attention

During these trials, the researchers wore different sensors that monitored everything from heart rate to eye movements. This helped get a clear picture of how much work was on the pilot’s plate and where their focus was directed during critical tasks. The information gathered allowed the researchers to categorize different types of workload, such as cognitive or visual workload.

Interestingly, the analysis showed that as the number of drones increased, the pilots didn’t seem to feel more overwhelmed. The workload estimates remained steady. This was surprising given the common belief that more drones equal more stress for the pilot.

Factors Affecting Performance

After running several trials, the researchers realized that even when things got stressful, such as unexpected aircraft showing up or weather changing, pilots still managed to maintain a good sense of control.

Despite some increases in workload during tricky scenarios, they concluded that pilots were still performing well. The study suggested other factors might be influencing performance, such as the design of the interfaces they were using or training they received.

Situation Awareness and User Interaction

The researchers also looked into how aware the pilots were of their surroundings and how they interacted with various screens. Most pilots focused their attention primarily on the ADS-B display and the Wing interface, where they gathered vital info about crewed aircraft and the status of the drones.

When there were unexpected events, the pilots changed how they interacted with their screens. For instance, they paid more attention to weather information when bad weather was on the horizon. This indicates they were actively adjusting their focus based on what was happening during the trial.

Conclusion

In conclusion, this study shined a light on the complex world of drone operations and pilot performance. It showed that the number of drones alone isn’t the deciding factor in pilot effectiveness. Other elements, like the technology used and the training received, play crucial roles.

Most importantly, the results highlighted the need for more robust data to support drone operations in the real world, paving the way for safer and more efficient flying in the skies.

In the end, it appears that drone pilots can indeed multitask successfully without losing their cool - even when the skies are filled with buzzing machines! So, the next time you see a swarm of drones, remember: their pilots aren’t just trying to survive the chaos; they’re thriving in it!

Original Source

Title: OSU-Wing PIC Phase I Evaluation: Baseline Workload and Situation Awareness Results

Abstract: The common theory is that human pilot's performance degrades when responsible for an increased number of uncrewed aircraft systems (UAS). This theory was developed in the early 2010's for ground robots and not highly autonomous UAS. It has been shown that increasing autonomy can mitigate some performance impacts associated with increasing the number of UAS. Overall, the Oregon State University-Wing collaboration seeks to understand what factors negatively impact a pilot's ability to maintain responsibility and control over an assigned set of active UAS. The Phase I evaluation establishes baseline data focused on the number of UAS and the number of nests increase. This evaluation focuses on nominal operations as well as crewed aircraft encounters and adverse weather changes. The results demonstrate that the pilots were actively engaged and had very good situation awareness. Manipulation of the conditions did not result in any significant differences in overall workload. The overall results debunk the theory that increasing the number of UAS is detrimental to pilot's performance.

Authors: Julie A. Adams, Christopher A. Sanchez, Vivek Mallampati, Joshua Bhagat Smith, Emily Burgess, Andrew Dassonville

Last Update: 2024-11-27 00:00:00

Language: English

Source URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.18750

Source PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2411.18750

Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.

Thank you to arxiv for use of its open access interoperability.

Similar Articles