Dissipation and Dynamics in Quantum Systems
Exploring how dissipation affects critical behavior in fermionic systems.
― 7 min read
Table of Contents
- The Concept of Critical Dynamics
- Kibble-Zurek Mechanism (KZM)
- Dissipation's Role in Critical Dynamics
- The Impact of Dissipation on the KZM
- Exploring Two-band Fermionic Systems
- The Rice-Mele Model: An Example
- What Happens During a Quench?
- The Shockley Model and Scaling Behaviors
- Haldane Model: A New Dimension
- Key Findings and Implications
- Conclusion
- Original Source
- Reference Links
Imagine a party where everyone is trying to dance in sync as the music changes. When the tempo changes too quickly, some people will trip over their own feet and get out of step. This is similar to what happens in quantum systems at critical points. Scientists study these changes to understand how systems behave when they go through phase transitions, like turning from a liquid to a solid.
In quantum physics, we have systems that can be described by two types of particles called fermions. These are like the cool kids of the quantum world. They follow their own set of rules, which can make studying them a bit tricky.
The Concept of Critical Dynamics
At certain points, called critical points, the properties of materials change dramatically. Think of boiling water; it changes from liquid to gas at a specific temperature. In the same way, fermionic systems can change their properties when they are pushed to these critical points. However, when we study these systems, we face problems, especially when there's something called Dissipation involved.
Dissipation is like a party crasher. It messes up the synchronized dancing by introducing noise and randomness. This can lead to unexpected behaviors in the system. Scientists want to figure out how this crasher affects the dynamics of the system and whether we can still see those critical changes happening.
Kibble-Zurek Mechanism (KZM)
The Kibble-Zurek Mechanism (KZM) is a fancy way of explaining how systems get out of sync when they are changing rapidly. It's like trying to change lanes on a highway during rush hour – if you don't do it at just the right moment, you might cause a jam. When a system is driven across its critical point at a slow pace, it tends to stay in sync. However, if it is driven too fast, it gets out of sync, leading to defects.
In quantum systems, these defects can manifest in various ways. Often, scientists want to quantify how many defects appear as the system changes.
Dissipation's Role in Critical Dynamics
Now, let's get back to our party. Imagine if the music isn't just changing, but the speakers are also malfunctioning. This problem of dissipation can drastically change how our dance party (the quantum system) behaves.
In simpler terms, when dissipation is present, it can hinder the system's ability to reach a well-defined critical state. Instead of seeing the elegant dance moves we expect, we may end up with a chaotic mess. This has led researchers to look into what happens during these dissipative dynamics.
The Impact of Dissipation on the KZM
When we consider how dissipation affects the KZM, something interesting happens. Rather than just watching defects appear, we can see the emergence of another kind of behavior, dubbed anti-KZ (AKZ) behavior. Think of it as a counter-dance – instead of moving gracefully toward the critical point, the system might create more mess as it tries to keep up, resulting in even more defects.
Exploring Two-band Fermionic Systems
To investigate these ideas, scientists examine a particular family of fermionic systems arranged on lattices. A lattice is like a neatly organized dance floor, where each fermion has its own spot to groove. By changing the environment of these lattices, researchers can observe how the fermions react to different levels of dissipation.
By using models like the Rice-Mele Model, scientists can explore how variations in loss between different sections of the lattice can lead to unique outcomes. If you think of one side of the dance floor having a louder speaker than the other, it makes sense that the dancers on one side would react differently than those on the quieter side.
The Rice-Mele Model: An Example
In the Rice-Mele model, two types of sublattices are involved, and an exciting process happens when we introduce differences in loss between them. When we tweak the loss on one side of the lattice, a new kind of scaling behavior arises, referred to as dissipative KZ (DKZ) scaling. This behavior resembles the typical KZ scaling but with unique twists due to the added noise from dissipation.
Imagine if the dancers on one side of the floor started getting tired while those on the other side seemed to have boundless energy. The balance of energy on the dance floor is dramatically changed, leading to different outcomes.
What Happens During a Quench?
A quench is a rapid change in the system that drives it across a critical point. Think of suddenly turning off the music at a party. The initial conditions determine how the dancers (our particles) will react. If they started off in sync, they could remain that way if the quench is gentle. However, if it's abrupt, chaos can ensue. The same principles apply when we look at our quantum systems.
Scientific exploration examines how quickly we can go from one state to another and what emerges as a result. It turns out that when we perform these quench processes on fermionic systems, we can observe different scaling behaviors depending on the level of dissipation introduced.
The Shockley Model and Scaling Behaviors
The Shockley model adds another layer of complexity. Here, we see two types of scaling behaviors that arise. One is related to the traditional KZ scaling, whereas the other is tied to dissipative effects that exist independently of the critical dynamics.
If we think about this in terms of our dance party, sometimes the music can change in a way that changes the vibe of the entire event, while other times the environmental factors (like the loud speakers or lights) can lead to different behaviors, regardless of the music tempo.
Haldane Model: A New Dimension
The Haldane model introduces a new dimension to the mix. This model is set on a honeycomb lattice and provides an opportunity to see how various factors come together. The Haldane model also showcases both KZ and dissipative behaviors, allowing scientists to explore even more complex interactions.
In terms of our party analogy, think of it as switching locations to a bigger venue. The shape of the dance floor and how it’s set up can lead to new styles of dancing and interaction among the partygoers.
Key Findings and Implications
As scientists dive into these complex models, they learn several things:
-
Dissipation Changes Dynamics: The presence of dissipation can create new behaviors in quantum systems that seem to contradict traditional theories.
-
Scaling Laws Reveal Patterns: The observed scaling behaviors can help researchers predict how systems will change over time, providing insights into fundamental physics.
-
Experimental Opportunities: The findings open doors to practical experiments. Implementing controlled environments can help isolate these effects, leading to better understanding and manipulation of quantum systems.
-
Bridging Classical and Quantum Physics: The principles observed in these models can help in understanding various phenomena in everyday life, such as how materials behave under stresses or how energy flows through systems.
Conclusion
In summary, the exploration of dissipative dynamics in two-band fermionic systems reveals a fascinating dance of particles. Just as at a party, where the music, the environment, and the dancers all interact, the quantum world is equally complex.
By continuing to study these relationships, scientists can unravel more secrets of the universe, leading to a future where we might not just observe but actively choreograph the dance of particles on a grand scale. Science, much like a good party, should always leave room for surprises and delightful twists.
Title: Kibble-Zurek scaling law in dissipative critical dynamics
Abstract: We investigate the dissipative quench dynamics in a family of two-band fermionic systems on bipartite lattices ramped across their critical points, which is cast into the Lindblad formalism. First, we demonstrate an exact solution in the presence of uniform loss or gain, which tells that dissipation exponentially suppresses the Kibble-Zurek (KZ) scaling behavior and the quantum jump part of the dissipation is responsible for the anti-KZ (AKZ) behavior. Then, in a scenario of engineered dissipation, we exemplify the effect of loss difference between the two sublattices of the system by three typical models. By the one-dimensional Rice-Mele model, we unravel a kind of dissipative KZ (DKZ) scaling law in the limit of loss difference and point out a convenient way to observe the DKZ behavior by counting the number of residual particles. Nevertheless, in the one-dimensional Shockley model, we find a nonuniversal scaling behavior irrelevant to the critical dynamics. Thus we explore several quench protocols so that these two scaling behaviors can appear together or separately. At last, we extend our findings to the two-dimensional Haldane model for Chern insulators consistently.
Authors: Han-Chuan Kou, Peng Li
Last Update: 2024-11-30 00:00:00
Language: English
Source URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.16406
Source PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2411.16406
Licence: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.
Thank you to arxiv for use of its open access interoperability.
Reference Links
- https://doi.org/
- https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511973765
- https://doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/9/8/029
- https://doi.org/10.1038/317505a0
- https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.105701
- https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.245701
- https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.72.161201
- https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.73.063405
- https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.120407
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00018732.2010.514702
- https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.83.863
- https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.106.184301
- https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.108.214307
- https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.97.235144
- https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.216601
- https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.102.184302
- https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.106.134203
- https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.91.015005
- https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.5.L012006
- https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199213900.001.0001
- https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.2.041022
- https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.080402
- https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.95.224303
- https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.103.012608
- https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.104.064313
- https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.107.014303
- https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-30377-x
- https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.230602
- https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.023211
- https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.050401
- https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.98.064307
- https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-30840-4
- https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.108.224203
- https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.110.064317
- https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.04329
- https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys2251
- https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.7.011016
- https://doi.org/10.1038/nature24622
- https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.86.1391
- https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.063605
- https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys1342
- https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys4121
- https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-021-01491-x
- https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.013802
- https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063779612060068
- https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.87.224301
- https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.107.245401
- https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25607-8
- https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.61.2015
- https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32858-9
- https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.108.L220301
- https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.74.085308
- https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.043247