The Dark Side of Memes: Anti-Muslim Sentiments
Examining the rise of anti-Muslim memes and their impact on culture.
S M Jishanul Islam, Sahid Hossain Mustakim, Sadia Ahmmed, Md. Faiyaz Abdullah Sayeedi, Swapnil Khandoker, Syed Tasdid Azam Dhrubo, Nahid Hossain
― 5 min read
Table of Contents
- What Are Memes?
- The Problem of Anti-Muslim Memes
- Understanding the Growing Challenge
- The Need for a Specific Dataset
- Collecting Data
- Analyzing the Data
- The Methodology
- Data Pre-Processing
- Visual Language Model
- Classifier Head
- Testing the Model
- Overcoming Challenges
- Conclusion
- Original Source
- Reference Links
In recent years, the internet has become a lively playground for Memes, where humor and creativity reign. However, amidst the laughter, some memes have taken a dark turn, especially against Muslims. This report delves into the growing concern about anti-Muslim sentiments spread through memes and how these images and texts can sometimes lead to misunderstandings or reinforce negative stereotypes.
What Are Memes?
Memes are snippets of culture typically shared online, often as images with witty captions. They can be funny, relatable, and sometimes poignant. However, as with all things that gain popularity, they can also be twisted. Some memes blend humor with hate, presenting a smiling face while hiding a sinister message beneath. It’s a bit like a chocolate-covered onion—sweet on the outside but unpleasant once you take a bite.
The Problem of Anti-Muslim Memes
The concern with anti-Muslim memes is that they can spread harmful stereotypes while masquerading as humor. Though memes may seem harmless, they can propagate hate and reinforce negative views about Muslims. This problem has gained traction, particularly on social media platforms, where these memes circulate rapidly, influencing public perception.
Understanding the Growing Challenge
As memes continue to evolve, they have become a sophisticated tool for conveying messages, often mixing text and images. This combination makes it tricky to identify and counter hate speech effectively. While general hate speech detection has improved, anti-Muslim memes remain a challenge. They often involve subtle humor and cultural references that can easily be overlooked by traditional detection systems. It’s like trying to spot a needle in a haystack made of giggles and eye rolls.
The Need for a Specific Dataset
To tackle the issue of anti-Muslim memes, researchers have realized the need for an accurate dataset. While there are many Datasets targeting hate speech, they often focus on either text or broader categories. This can miss the specific cultural nuances related to anti-Muslim prejudice. Researchers set out to gather a dataset that could help with the detection of these specific memes, collecting numerous examples from various online platforms.
Collecting Data
A new dataset comprises 953 memes gathered from popular sites like Reddit, X, 9GAG, and Google Images. The goal was to capture a wide range of potential anti-Muslim content. Researchers sifted through memes with text incorporated into the images, classifying them as either hateful or non-hateful. This classification wasn’t just a haphazard decision; it involved a thorough review by a team of experienced annotators. They made sure to use consistent criteria to ensure fairness and minimize bias. It’s a bit like having a gourmet meal—every ingredient needs to be just right to avoid any bad aftertaste.
Analyzing the Data
After the data collection, researchers examined patterns in how anti-Muslim messages manifest in memes. They discovered that understanding cultural context was crucial in recognizing hate speech. This analysis helped to shed light on how Islamophobia operates online, providing insights that could lead to better ways of moderating content.
The Methodology
To classify the memes effectively, researchers designed a specific methodology. They used a model known as the Vision-and-Language Transformer (ViLT), which blends visuals and text. Think of it as a detective combining clues from both images and words to solve a case. This model helps capture the complex narratives present in memes, improving detection accuracy.
Data Pre-Processing
Before running the model, researchers needed to prepare the data. They used a tool to extract text from the memes, making sure everything was uniform in size. They also resized the images to keep the data consistent. To boost the overall quality, they employed some tricks like rotating images to enrich their dataset without creating distortions.
Visual Language Model
With the data all set, researchers applied the ViLT model. This model processes both images and text simultaneously, allowing it to understand the relationship between the two. By avoiding more complicated visual extraction processes, researchers simplified the procedure, focusing on what matters most—the meme content itself.
Classifier Head
Once the model learned from the memes, it was time to classify them as hateful or not. The researchers used layers of processing to refine the representations generated by ViLT. This rigorous process ensured that the final predictions were as accurate as possible. Think of it as getting a fine-tuned musical instrument ready for a performance—every detail counts.
Testing the Model
To evaluate how well the model performed, researchers ran a series of tests, comparing it against other visual-language models. They used different methods to split the dataset and ensure comprehensive testing. They trained the model over several epochs, using specific metrics to measure its performance. The results showed that the ViLT model outperformed many alternatives, demonstrating its reliability in detection.
Overcoming Challenges
Despite the promising results, the study faced challenges. The dataset size was a concern, limiting the model's learning capabilities. Like a chef needing more ingredients to create a flavorful dish, expanding the dataset would help the model improve its generalization. Researchers also highlighted that there could be more categories beyond just hateful and non-hateful, such as misinformation or overt versus covert hate speech. Adding these layers could provide deeper insights.
Conclusion
In summary, this research highlights the pressing issue of anti-Muslim hate speech appearing in memes and the efforts to create a model that detects it effectively. The study identified a dataset that captured the nuances of such content while employing a sophisticated model. Although the performance showed promise, there’s always room for improvement. Like any good recipe, the next steps involve refining the ingredients to ensure it tastes just right.
As memes continue to thrive in digital culture, it’s essential to keep a watchful eye on the messages they convey. While laughter is a vital part of life, it shouldn’t come at the expense of understanding and respect. The research thus serves as an important reminder that behind every meme, there can be a story—one that deserves to be told with care.
Original Source
Title: MIMIC: Multimodal Islamophobic Meme Identification and Classification
Abstract: Anti-Muslim hate speech has emerged within memes, characterized by context-dependent and rhetorical messages using text and images that seemingly mimic humor but convey Islamophobic sentiments. This work presents a novel dataset and proposes a classifier based on the Vision-and-Language Transformer (ViLT) specifically tailored to identify anti-Muslim hate within memes by integrating both visual and textual representations. Our model leverages joint modal embeddings between meme images and incorporated text to capture nuanced Islamophobic narratives that are unique to meme culture, providing both high detection accuracy and interoperability.
Authors: S M Jishanul Islam, Sahid Hossain Mustakim, Sadia Ahmmed, Md. Faiyaz Abdullah Sayeedi, Swapnil Khandoker, Syed Tasdid Azam Dhrubo, Nahid Hossain
Last Update: 2024-12-01 00:00:00
Language: English
Source URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.00681
Source PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2412.00681
Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.
Thank you to arxiv for use of its open access interoperability.
Reference Links
- https://github.com/faiyazabdullah/MIMIC
- https://www.neurips.cc/
- https://mirrors.ctan.org/macros/latex/contrib/natbib/natnotes.pdf
- https://www.ctan.org/pkg/booktabs
- https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/503/why-is-preferable-to
- https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/40492/what-are-the-differences-between-align-equation-and-displaymath
- https://mirrors.ctan.org/macros/latex/required/graphics/grfguide.pdf
- https://neurips.cc/Conferences/2024/PaperInformation/FundingDisclosure
- https://nips.cc/public/guides/CodeSubmissionPolicy
- https://neurips.cc/public/EthicsGuidelines