New Hope in the Fight Against Tuberculosis
Researchers explore peptides for more effective TB vaccines.
Constanza Estefania Martínez-Olivares, Vasti Lozano-Ordaz, Dulce Mata-Espinosa, Jorge Alberto Barrios-Payán, Ángel Elías Ortiz-Cabrera, Yadira Rocio Rodríguez-Miguez, Rogelio Hernández-Pando
― 9 min read
Table of Contents
- The Role of the Immune System in Fighting TB
- Cell-Mediated Immunity
- Humoral Immunity
- The BCG Vaccine: Its Benefits and Limitations
- Types of Vaccines in Development
- The Need for New Approaches
- Peptide Vaccines: A New Hope Against TB
- Peptide Synthesis and Testing
- Immunogenicity Testing
- Evaluating Memory Responses
- The Role of PD-1 and KLRG1
- Antibody Responses and ELISA Tests
- Challenge Trials: Testing Efficacy Against TB
- Impact of Adjuvants on Immune Response
- Conclusions and Future Directions
- Original Source
Tuberculosis (TB) is a serious disease caused by a germ called Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb). It mainly affects the lungs, but it can also target other parts of the body. TB spreads from person to person through the air when an infected person coughs or sneezes. Although TB is a major health problem worldwide, there is a vaccine, the Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccine, which helps protect against severe forms of TB in children.
BCG has been around since 1921 and is still used today, especially to protect babies from severe TB. However, it has some limitations, especially for adults. The effectiveness of BCG can vary, and it does not always provide long-lasting protection. Because of this, researchers are working hard to develop new vaccines that can better prevent TB in both children and adults.
The Role of the Immune System in Fighting TB
The immune system is our body's defense against infections. It is like a superhero team that fights off bad guys, such as germs. When Mtb enters the body, the immune system responds through two main forces: cell-mediated immunity and humoral immunity.
Cell-Mediated Immunity
Cell-mediated immunity relies on special immune cells called T cells. Among these, CD4+ T cells (also known as T helper cells) play a key role. These cells help activate other immune cells, including macrophages, which are like the body’s clean-up crew. They eat and destroy invading germs.
CD4+ T cells signal to other immune cells and help in making sure that CD8+ T cells (the ones that kill infected cells) work effectively. A strong response from these T helper cells is important for fighting off Mtb. A specific kind of T helper response, called the T helper type 1 (Th1) response, is especially important in protecting against Mtb.
There is some debate among scientists about the best kinds of T cells for fighting TB. Some studies think that multifunctional T cells, which produce multiple signals, might be crucial. However, others suggest these cells might be linked to active TB disease instead of protection. So, the jury is still out on this.
Humoral Immunity
Humoral immunity involves B cells and Antibodies. Think of B cells as the other half of the superhero team, creating weapons (antibodies) that target and neutralize germs. A balanced effort between cell-mediated immunity and humoral immunity is needed to effectively fight TB.
Even though BCG mainly works through cell-mediated immunity, recent studies show that B cells and antibodies also play important roles in fighting TB. Therefore, researchers need to keep both Immune Responses in mind when developing new vaccines.
The BCG Vaccine: Its Benefits and Limitations
BCG helps protect infants from severe forms of TB, such as TB meningitis and miliary TB. However, in adults, BCG does not do as great a job at protecting against the more common pulmonary TB. This creates a need for better vaccines.
There are some specific reasons for BCG's limitations:
- Variable Effectiveness: The protection BCG offers can vary from person to person.
- Limited Memory: The immune memory it creates may not last long enough to protect against future infections.
- Preference for Effector Memory: BCG primarily helps build a type of immune memory cell that is not as effective for long-term protection.
These challenges mean that scientists are on the lookout for better alternatives.
Types of Vaccines in Development
Researchers have been trying to develop new TB vaccines, and there are four main types that show promise:
- Live Attenuated Vaccines: These contain weakened forms of the bacteria.
- Whole or Fragment Inactivated Cell Vaccines: These use killed bacteria or parts of bacteria.
- Protein Subunit Vaccines: These contain pieces of the bacteria that are important for immunity.
- Viral Vector Vaccines: These use harmless viruses to carry pieces of TB bacteria into the body to provoke an immune response.
Among these, protein subunit vaccines are particularly exciting. They are currently being tested in clinical trials, showing good safety and effectiveness.
The Need for New Approaches
Due to BCG's limitations, researchers are looking for new ways to improve TB vaccines. Many scientists believe that newer vaccines need to be designed carefully to stimulate a broader immune response. For example, the use of Adjuvants (substances that enhance the immune response) is common, especially when working with protein subunit vaccines.
Researchers have been studying several specific proteins from the TB bacteria, such as ESAT-6, CFP-10, and Ag85 series. These proteins can activate the immune system and help B cells and T cells work together better.
Peptide Vaccines: A New Hope Against TB
In an effort to make better TB vaccines, researchers have been looking into Peptides, which are small fragments of proteins. Four specific peptides, called G1, G2, H1, and H2, were selected based on computer analyses. The hope is that these peptides can stimulate the immune system effectively.
To study these peptides further, researchers conducted a series of tests, including their effects on cells and their potential as vaccines. The results of these tests will help determine if they can be used effectively in humans.
Peptide Synthesis and Testing
Peptides can be made in the lab using a process called peptide synthesis. After confirming that the peptides have the right structure and purity, it is essential to see how safe they are for cells. Researchers look at how these peptides affect cell survival using a specific cell line.
During tests, various concentrations of the peptides were applied. The goal was to see if they were toxic to cells, and the results showed that they were relatively safe at lower concentrations. That’s good news for safety!
Immunogenicity Testing
Once researchers confirmed that the peptides were safe, the next step was to evaluate their ability to stimulate an immune response. This phase checks if T cells will respond by producing important signals (such as certain cytokines) that help fight off infections.
Mice were used as a model to see how well these peptides could work as vaccines. After vaccinating the mice with BCG and then boosting them with the peptides, the immune responses in the lungs and spleen were assessed.
Some results showed that specific peptides did indeed prompt T cells to produce cytokines, which are like distress signals sent by immune cells to rally support against the infection. However, not all peptides showed strong responses, which indicates that more testing is needed.
Evaluating Memory Responses
The next series of tests looked at how well the immune system remembered the attack from the peptides. In vaccination terms, memory responses refer to the immune system’s ability to recognize and fight off a previously encountered pathogen.
In these tests, scientists looked at two types of memory: effector memory and central memory. Effector memory cells are quick to respond to reinfection, while central memory cells are crucial for long-term immunity.
Although some peptides showed promise in stimulating memory, others did not appear to enhance the desired immune memory response.
The Role of PD-1 and KLRG1
As responses to vaccination are assessed, researchers also investigate specific markers on immune cells, called PD-1 and KLRG1. The presence of these markers can indicate whether T cells are in a state of activation or exhaustion.
These markers help researchers figure out which types of immune responses are developing after vaccination. In some cases, certain peptides enhanced populations of T cells with favorable markers, which could potentially lead to better protection against TB.
Antibody Responses and ELISA Tests
Another crucial part of evaluating the effectiveness of vaccines is checking for antibody responses. Antibodies are proteins produced by B cells that help identify and neutralize foreign objects like bacteria and viruses.
In these studies, scientists used a test called ELISA to measure antibody levels in mouse serum. Results showed that specific peptides generated a notable antibody response. That’s good news because antibodies play a vital role in protecting against infections.
Interestingly, some peptides had similar antibody responses regardless of the amount given. This suggests that these peptides have strong immunogenic properties. However, others performed better when combined with adjuvants like aluminum hydroxide.
Challenge Trials: Testing Efficacy Against TB
After all that groundwork, researchers must see if the peptides can offer any real protection against TB. Mice were then challenged with live Mtb to see how well the immune response held up against an actual infection.
In the experiments, some peptides managed to extend the survival of the infected mice. This finding is promising because it suggests that the peptides can help boost the protective effect that BCG has against TB.
Researchers also measured how much TB bacteria were left in the mice's lungs after the challenge. Some peptide combinations showed a significant reduction in bacterial loads, indicating that they helped the immune system fight the infection more effectively.
Impact of Adjuvants on Immune Response
The use of adjuvants, such as aluminum hydroxide, can enhance the performance of peptide vaccines. However, results showed mixed outcomes. While some peptides did benefit from the presence of the adjuvant, others did not seem to show the expected improvement in reducing the bacterial load.
This finding opens up an important discussion on how adjuvants should be used in vaccine formulations. The goal is to maximize immune responses while minimizing potential side effects.
Conclusions and Future Directions
Overall, this study sheds light on the potential of using distinct peptides as subunit vaccines against TB. The results suggest that G1, G2, H1, and H2 can stimulate the immune system in a meaningful way, opening the door for their use in future TB vaccines.
However, it’s clear that there are many factors to consider, such as the type of immune responses triggered, the role of adjuvants, and the method of vaccine delivery. Ongoing research is necessary to better understand how these peptides work in the immune system and to refine vaccine strategies.
The journey to developing a superior TB vaccine is ongoing, and scientists believe that the knowledge gained from this research will help pave the way to better vaccines in the future. Who knows? One day, we might just have a superhero vaccine that can kick TB to the curb for good!
Title: Mycobacterial EsxG·EsxH (TB9.8·TB10.4) peptides as a subunit vaccine to booster BCG vaccination in an experimental model of pulmonary Tuberculosis
Abstract: The attenuated Mycobacterium bovis bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) vaccine is currently the only validated vaccine against tuberculosis (TB). In a previous study, we conducted an in-silico selection of four peptides (G1, G2, H1, and H2) derived from the mycobacterial protein antigens TB10.9{middle dot}TB10.4 (EsxG{middle dot}EsxH). Bioinformatic analysis and molecular dynamic simulations predicted these epitopes could be loaded into a MHC-II complex, inducing T and B cell activation. The present study aimed to experimentally validate these peptides as subunit vaccines by determining their cytotoxicity, immunogenicity, and protective efficacy against Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) in mice when administered as a booster to BCG vaccination. Mice were vaccinated with BCG and, two months later, were subcutaneously immunized with either peptide G1, G2, H1, or H2. One-month post-immunization, mice were challenged with the reference strain H37Rv of moderate virulence or the hypervirulent clinical isolate 09005186. After vaccination and before the challenge, the spleen and lung cells were harvested and stimulated in vitro with the corresponding peptide to measure cytokine expression in CD4+, and CD8+ T cells, as well as the phenotypes of activated effector T cells, proliferative senescence, central and periphery memory CD4+ and CD8+ cells. Additionally, specific IgG antibody titers elicited by each peptide were measured using ELISA. Compared with animals vaccinated only with BCG, boosting BCG vaccination with these peptides provided enhanced protection by significantly prolonging the mice survival, reducing the bacillary load, and decreasing tissue damage (pneumonia). These findings contribute to the broader understanding of peptide-based subunit vaccines and highlight the potential for tailored approaches to enhance protective immunity.
Authors: Constanza Estefania Martínez-Olivares, Vasti Lozano-Ordaz, Dulce Mata-Espinosa, Jorge Alberto Barrios-Payán, Ángel Elías Ortiz-Cabrera, Yadira Rocio Rodríguez-Miguez, Rogelio Hernández-Pando
Last Update: Dec 12, 2024
Language: English
Source URL: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.12.12.628125
Source PDF: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.12.12.628125.full.pdf
Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.
Thank you to biorxiv for use of its open access interoperability.