Sci Simple

New Science Research Articles Everyday

# Biology # Systems Biology

The Dance of Gene Regulation: EMT Uncovered

Explore how gene regulatory networks influence cell behavior and transitions.

Anupam Dey, Adam L. MacLean

― 7 min read


Gene Networks Behind Cell Gene Networks Behind Cell Transition behavior in cancer. How gene regulation shapes cell
Table of Contents

Gene Regulatory Networks (GRNs) play a key role in determining how cells behave. They help decide what type of cell a particular cell will become. These networks are made up of different components, including genes and proteins called Transcription Factors, which work together to control the expression of different genes. Understanding how these networks function can help us learn about many biological processes, such as development and disease.

What Are Gene Regulatory Networks?

At the heart of a GRN are the interactions between various genes and their products. Think of it like a big chat room where genes talk to each other, sometimes encouraging one another to express (turn on) or stay quiet (turn off). These interactions can be activating or inhibiting. This means that one gene may increase the activity of another, or it may suppress it.

Constructing complete GRNs that can accurately describe biological functions is often difficult. Although we know certain pathways quite well, many remain a mystery. For example, researchers have made some progress in understanding how sea urchins develop, but for many other organisms, GRNs are still challenging to piece together.

The Challenge of Complexity

One of the biggest hurdles researchers face is the complexity of these networks. GRNs can quickly become large and tangled with many overlapping signals and feedback loops. Instead of attempting to grasp the entirety of a GRN, scientists often focus on smaller parts. These smaller networks can provide insights into expected cell behaviors with less complexity involved.

Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition (EMT)

A particular process that has caught researchers' attention is called epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT). This is a process where cells change their characteristics, usually transforming from a tightly connected group (epithelial cells) to a more mobile and invasive state (mesenchymal cells). This shift is crucial for various processes, including wound healing and cancer spread.

EMT is characterized by specific gene interactions. For instance, certain transcription factors, like ZEB and SNAIL, work together with microRNAs like miR-200 and miR-34 to control this transition. It’s like a dance where specific dancers (genes) take turns leading or following, and everyone has to work together to create the right moves (cell states).

The Dynamics of EMT

During EMT, cells can transition through several different states. They don't simply flip a switch from one type to another; rather, there are intermediate stages. These intermediary states are like the awkward dance moves that occur before finding rhythm in the final performance.

Researchers have identified at least three stable states during EMT, suggesting that cells can "hang out" in different ways as they transition. The dynamic nature of these states means that cells can embark on several paths during the transition, making it a complex process worthy of study.

Modeling the Network Logic

When constructing mathematical models of GRNs, scientists face a unique challenge. Whenever a gene receives more than one regulatory signal, figuring out how those signals combine is crucial. For example, one model might assume that signals work together (AND logic), while another might assume they add together (OR logic).

These choices can significantly impact how we understand cell behavior during transitions like EMT. If one model assumes that more regulatory signals strengthen a response (AND logic), it may predict different outcomes than a model that suggests each signal can act independently (OR logic).

In studies of EMT, scientists have focused on the GRN involving SNAIL, miR-200, and ZEB. By tweaking the strengths of these regulatory factors, they can observe how changes impact the different stable states the system can achieve.

Sensitivity of Gene Regulation

Through preliminary investigations, researchers have determined that the effect of certain changes in gene regulation can vary widely depending on whether the underlying logic is AND or OR. For instance, an increase in the strength of a signal might have a major impact on one aspect of the network while barely affecting another, depending on how the interactions are defined.

This sensitivity can create distinct differences in when and how cells transition through EMT. If one logic model predicts that a small change can destabilize an epithelial state, another model may suggest that the same change has minimal impact.

The Importance of Logic Choice

As we dive deeper into these models, one significant aspect emerges: the choice of network logic can dictate the fate of cells. A model using AND logic might suggest that cells will remain stable until a stronger signal is received, whereas a model using OR logic could predict that cells may change states with a lower signal, as long as it’s a different kind of signal.

In one study, researchers found that by varying the strengths of different regulatory pathways, they could shift the balance of stability between epithelial and mesenchymal states. This means that if we tweak one setting here or there, we might make cells more likely to remain in one state or transition to another.

Discovering EMT Pathways

Many studies show that the behavior of these GRNs can be affected by adding or removing specific factors. For instance, when miR-200 is inhibited, the result is the upregulation of ZEB, indicating that the cell can easily transition towards EMT. Conversely, when miR-200 is re-expressed in mesenchymal cells, it can lead them back to their original epithelial state. These findings help explain why certain cells are more prone to transitioning than others.

Experiments conducted in different cell types have highlighted that GRNs can behave differently depending on context. Some cells may readily undergo transition, while others may be more resistant to change. This variability highlights the importance of context and environmental signals in cell behavior.

Understanding Hybrid States

Hybrid states are interesting because they showcase characteristics of both epithelial and mesenchymal cells. For example, researchers have shown that when cells are pushed into a hybrid state, they can exhibit collective behavior while also retaining some epithelial features. This ability to straddle both worlds can make these cells particularly dangerous when it comes to cancer metastasis, as they can move and invade while still maintaining connections to their original tissue.

By better understanding how these hybrid states are controlled by GRNs, researchers can explore new therapeutic avenues. If we can figure out how to influence these pathways, maybe we can discourage cancer cells from transitioning into more invasive forms.

Designing Experimental Approaches

Researchers have highlighted the importance of designing experiments that can directly test predictions made by GRN models. For instance, by manipulating miR-200 levels, scientists can observe whether this change leads to an earlier or later onset of EMT. Such experiments could help confirm whether the network operates under AND or OR logic.

By establishing a set of experimental conditions, scientists can gather evidence supporting one model or the other. If inhibiting miR-200 leads to a more significant shift toward EMT than enhancing ZEB activation, this might suggest that the network logic favors a certain type of interaction.

Real-World Applications

Understanding how GRNs function has far-reaching implications. This knowledge can help researchers develop strategies to manipulate cell behavior, perhaps leading to treatments that prevent cancer cells from transitioning into a more aggressive state.

By analyzing the interactions within GRNs, we can uncover the rules that govern how these networks work. Armed with this information, scientists can design better experiments and ultimately improve treatments for various diseases, especially those related to cancer.

Conclusion

Gene regulatory networks offer fascinating insights into how cells communicate, decide, and transition between states. The logic underlying these networks can significantly shape cell behavior, leading to distinct outcomes.

As researchers continue to unravel the intricacies of GRNs, we can expect to see great advancements in understanding cellular processes. With laughter along the way, it’s a science that truly dances on the edge of complexity!

Original Source

Title: Transition paths across the EMT landscape are dictated by network logic

Abstract: During development and cancer metastasis, cells transition reversibly from epithelial to mesenchymal via intermediate cell states during epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT). EMT is controlled by gene regulatory networks (GRNs) and can be described by a three-node GRN that permits tristable EMT landscapes. In this GRN, multiple inputs regulate the transcription factor ZEB that induces EMT. It is unknown how to choose the network logic for such regulation. Here we explore the effects of network logic on a tristable EMT network. We discover that the choice of additive vs multiplicative logic affects EMT phenotypes, leading to opposing predictions regarding the factors controlling EMT transition paths. We show that strong inhibition of miR-200 destabilizes the epithelial state and initiates EMT for multiplicative (AND) but not additive (OR) logic, suggesting that AND logic is in better agreement with experimental measurements of the effects of miR-200 regulation on EMT. Using experimental single-cell data, stochastic simulations, and perturbation analysis, we demonstrate how our results can be used to design experiments to infer the network logic of an EMT GRN in live cells. Our results explain how the manipulation of molecular interactions can stabilize or destabilize EMT hybrid states, of relevance during cancer progression and metastasis. More generally, we highlight the importance of the choice of network logic in GRN models in the presence of biological noise and multistability.

Authors: Anupam Dey, Adam L. MacLean

Last Update: 2024-12-12 00:00:00

Language: English

Source URL: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.12.03.626660

Source PDF: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.12.03.626660.full.pdf

Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.

Thank you to biorxiv for use of its open access interoperability.

Similar Articles