Sci Simple

New Science Research Articles Everyday

# Computer Science # Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

RHFL+: A New Era for Federated Learning

RHFL+ tackles data noise and model differences in federated learning.

Chun-Mei Feng, Yuanyang He, Jian Zou, Salman Khan, Huan Xiong, Zhen Li, Wangmeng Zuo, Rick Siow Mong Goh, Yong Liu

― 6 min read


RHFL+: Tackling Data RHFL+: Tackling Data Challenges diversity in federated learning. New method addresses noise and model
Table of Contents

Federated Learning (FL) is a clever way for multiple devices or clients to work together to train a model without sharing their private data. Think of it as a group project where everyone contributes, but instead of everyone sharing their homework, they just share the final results. This method keeps sensitive data safe while still allowing for the collective improvement of machine learning models.

The Challenge of Model Heterogeneity

In this collaborative setup, clients often have different needs and capabilities, leading to model heterogeneity. Imagine a group of people trying to learn a new skill, but each one has their own method of doing so. One person might prefer to use a piano, while another uses a guitar. This variation can create a challenge, particularly when clients have different models or algorithms to work with.

In real-world situations, institutions or individuals typically tailor their models to suit specific tasks. For example, medical facilities might design unique models for different health applications, making it essential for federated learning to cater to this variety.

Issues with Noisy Data

One of the main problems in federated learning is dealing with noisy data. Noisy data refers to information that contains errors or incorrect labels. This can occur for various reasons. Sometimes, human error leads to wrong labels, while other times, participants may intentionally share incorrect information to protect their interests.

Imagine you're at a potluck where everyone brings a dish labeled as a family recipe. However, some guests might not have accurately labeled their food, leading to potential chaos when it's time to eat. You wouldn't want to unknowingly bite into a dish you didn’t expect!

This noise can hurt the performance of machine learning models. When models learn from this incorrect data, they end up making poor predictions, which is much like trying to follow a recipe that has incorrect instructions.

Old Methods and Their Limitations

Traditionally, methods for dealing with noisy data focused on centralized systems where all the data is gathered in one place. These approaches could analyze the data comprehensively and fix errors before training. However, in federated learning, clients can’t simply share their private information. As a result, existing methods often fall short in managing label noise effectively.

They usually make assumptions that the clients have access to clean, high-quality data. But in reality, it's not uncommon for participants to have noisy data. This can lead to performance issues that existing methods struggle to fix.

The Proposed Solution: RHFL+

To tackle the dual challenge of model heterogeneity and noisy data, a new approach known as RHFL+ is introduced. This method combines several innovative strategies to enhance the federated learning process, ensuring clients can learn effectively, even in the face of noise.

Key Features of RHFL+

  1. Aligning Knowledge: RHFL+ allows clients to align their outputs using public datasets. Clients share their knowledge by comparing their predictions against each other without sharing their sensitive data. This strategy is akin to friends sharing tips and tricks while preparing for a cooking contest, each using their own recipes but helping one another to improve.

  2. Dynamic Label Refinement (DLR): This fancy-sounding technique updates the labels that clients use when training their models. Instead of sticking to potentially incorrect labels, DLR helps to adjust them based on what the model predicts. It’s like realizing halfway through baking that your cake mix called for sugar, but you accidentally grabbed salt instead. You adjust the recipe and keep going!

  3. Enhanced Client Confidence Re-weighting (ECCR): This part of the strategy focuses on giving different importance to each client's input. If you have a friend who always brings the wrong dish to a potluck, you might not want to rely on their cooking advice. Similarly, ECCR allows the system to focus more on the contributions of clients with better data quality and model performance.

How It Works

The RHFL+ strategy operates in distinct phases:

  1. Local Learning: Each client begins by training their own model on their private dataset. This step allows them to gather initial knowledge based on their unique data.

  2. Collaborative Learning: After local learning, clients share their knowledge by comparing their outputs on a public dataset. This knowledge transfer is done without compromising data security, as no private information is exchanged.

  3. Dynamic Updates: As clients share knowledge, DLR adjusts the labels based on the model’s predictions, refining what clients consider accurate. This is an ongoing process, ensuring that as training progresses, clients constantly improve their understanding.

  4. Confidence Adjustment: Finally, ECCR evaluates how much weight to give each client's input based on their performance and the quality of their data. This helps to mitigate the noise from less reliable contributors.

Experimental Results

In numerous tests, RHFL+ consistently outperformed existing methods when dealing with noisy data and model variations. Even in scenarios where clients had data that was riddled with noise, the combined strategy of aligning knowledge, refining labels, and adjusting contributions led to impressive results.

Different Scenarios

  1. Heterogeneous Clients: Clients with different models trained on varying datasets still managed to improve their performance through collaborative efforts. Even when one client brought noise to the table, the others helped guide the learning process.

  2. Noise Types: RHFL+ proved effective against various types of noise, whether it was symmetrical (where labels were wrong across the board) or pair (where some labels were simply swapped). This versatility shows how RHFL+ can adapt to many real-world conditions where data may not be perfect.

Conclusion

In the realm of machine learning and data science, effectively handling noisy data and model diversity is critical. RHFL+ brings new hope to federated learning by combining innovative techniques that ensure all clients can contribute to the overall learning process, even when they are all in different boats and bringing different meals to the potluck.

As technology evolves, RHFL+ stands as a significant advancement, proving that collaboration can triumph even when data may not be pristine. And just like a good recipe that benefits from various ingredients, federated learning is enriched through the collective knowledge of its diverse clients, leading to better outcomes for everyone involved.

Original Source

Title: Diffusion-Enhanced Test-time Adaptation with Text and Image Augmentation

Abstract: Existing test-time prompt tuning (TPT) methods focus on single-modality data, primarily enhancing images and using confidence ratings to filter out inaccurate images. However, while image generation models can produce visually diverse images, single-modality data enhancement techniques still fail to capture the comprehensive knowledge provided by different modalities. Additionally, we note that the performance of TPT-based methods drops significantly when the number of augmented images is limited, which is not unusual given the computational expense of generative augmentation. To address these issues, we introduce IT3A, a novel test-time adaptation method that utilizes a pre-trained generative model for multi-modal augmentation of each test sample from unknown new domains. By combining augmented data from pre-trained vision and language models, we enhance the ability of the model to adapt to unknown new test data. Additionally, to ensure that key semantics are accurately retained when generating various visual and text enhancements, we employ cosine similarity filtering between the logits of the enhanced images and text with the original test data. This process allows us to filter out some spurious augmentation and inadequate combinations. To leverage the diverse enhancements provided by the generation model across different modals, we have replaced prompt tuning with an adapter for greater flexibility in utilizing text templates. Our experiments on the test datasets with distribution shifts and domain gaps show that in a zero-shot setting, IT3A outperforms state-of-the-art test-time prompt tuning methods with a 5.50% increase in accuracy.

Authors: Chun-Mei Feng, Yuanyang He, Jian Zou, Salman Khan, Huan Xiong, Zhen Li, Wangmeng Zuo, Rick Siow Mong Goh, Yong Liu

Last Update: 2024-12-25 00:00:00

Language: English

Source URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.09706

Source PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2412.09706

Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.

Thank you to arxiv for use of its open access interoperability.

More from authors

Similar Articles