Sci Simple

New Science Research Articles Everyday

# Biology # Genetics

Secrets of Maize: Nature's Genetic Gatekeepers

Discover how maize prevents unwanted gene mixing.

Elli Cryan, Garnet Phinney, Arun S. Seetharam, Matthew M.S. Evans, Elizabeth A. Kellogg, Junpeng Zhan, Blake C. Meyers, Daniel Kliebenstein, Jeffrey Ross-Ibarra

― 5 min read


Maize's Genetic Secrets Maize's Genetic Secrets Revealed lineage. Uncover how maize safeguards its
Table of Contents

In the world of plants, Reproductive Barriers play a crucial role in keeping different species from mixing their genes. These barriers are like the bouncers of a nightclub, making sure that only the right type of pollen gets to the right type of flower. Among these barriers, maize (corn) has a fascinating system that prevents unwanted mixing with its wild relatives, the Teosintes. This prevention can lead to the creation of new species over time.

Types of Reproductive Barriers

Reproductive barriers can be divided into two main types: prezygotic and postzygotic. Prezygotic barriers operate before fertilization, while postzygotic barriers kick in after the pollen meets the ovary. In general, prezygotic barriers are more effective at keeping species separate because they stop pollen from even getting a chance to fertilize the egg.

Prezygotic Barriers

One fascinating prezygotic barrier in plants happens between pollen and the female reproductive organs. In maize, the interaction between pollen and the silk—a part of the flower—determines whether or not fertilization will take place. This can lead to reduced gene flow between different populations of maize.

Postzygotic Barriers

Postzygotic barriers come into play after fertilization. They can cause issues such as hybrid infertility, which means the offspring produced from two different species may not be able to reproduce themselves. However, these barriers are generally not as effective in preventing gene flow as prezygotic barriers.

The Importance of Maize

Maize, or corn, is not just a side dish at dinner. It's a major crop that was domesticated by indigenous peoples over nine thousand years ago in Mexico. This crop has undergone significant changes over time, influenced by wild relatives like the teosintes. These wild cousins of maize have played a role in creating the modern varieties of maize we see today.

The Role of Teosintes

The wild ancestors of maize, teosintes, are crucial for understanding the evolution of maize itself. At least two wild subspecies contributed to the origin of what we now call maize. Farmers in Central America still grow maize alongside these wild relatives, which shows how intertwined their histories are.

The Gametophytic Factors

Maize has a specific set of genes that control the above-mentioned reproductive barriers. Three important genes are known as Gametophytic factors (GA) located at different loci: Tcb1, Ga1, and Ga2. These genes are responsible for what is known as unilateral cross-incompatibility, where one population can fertilize another, but not vice versa.

The Ga1 Gene

The Ga1 gene was one of the first of its kind to be identified, with its "discovery" dating back over a century. This gene controls a barrier that separates maize from its relatives based on the compatibility of pollen and silk. When the silk gene is active, it can block pollen from a different type of maize that doesn't have a matching gene.

How Ga1 Works

The Ga1 gene operates through a fascinating mechanism. It produces proteins that interact with pollen, ensuring only compatible pollen can grow and fertilize the ovule. Thus, if a pollen grain with a non-matching gene meets an active silk, it will struggle to grow, leading to a failed fertilization event.

Identification of Other GA Genes

Once the Ga1 gene was understood, researchers went on to identify other gametophytic factors. Tcb1 and Ga2 were found to operate similarly to Ga1. Each of these genes can contribute to reproductive barriers that help maintain the distinctness of maize and teosinte populations.

Haplotype Diversity

In studying these GA genes, it's important to note that there is a lot of variation, or haplotype diversity, within maize. The presence and structure of these genes can affect how effectively barriers are maintained. For example, some maize lines carry versions of these genes that are either active or inactive, leading to different levels of gene flow.

The Inactive Ga1 Allele

Interestingly, a common form of the Ga1 allele, referred to as ga1-O, is inactive but appears to be frequent. Researchers believe that this allele may suppress the activity of active gametophytic factors, which presents a twist in our understanding of how reproductive barriers function.

How GA Genes Evolved

The evolutionary history of these GA genes is convoluted. These genes have been around for a long time, predating the domestication of maize. Their presence in different plant genomes hints at complex evolutionary pressures and interactions between maize and its relatives.

Interaction of GA Genes with SiRNA

The ga1-O allele also seems to be linked with small RNAs associated with pollen development. These tiny RNAs may play a role in regulating which genes get expressed. In some cases, lines with the ga1-O allele show different patterns of RNA expression compared to those with active Ga1 alleles.

Conclusion

The study of reproductive barriers in maize reveals an intricate web of interactions that prevents unwanted gene mixing and supports species diversity. Understanding how these barriers function and evolve is vital, not just for the science of plant biology but also for agriculture and food security. After all, every corn on the cob we enjoy today is the result of thousands of years of evolution and careful management. So next time you bite into corn, remember the complex history that helped bring that tasty morsel to your plate!

Original Source

Title: Molecular evolution of a reproductive barrier in maize and related species

Abstract: Three cross-incompatibility loci each control a distinct reproductive barrier in both domesticated maize (Zea mays ssp. mays) and its wild teosinte relatives. These three loci, Teosinte crossing barrier1 (Tcb1), Gametophytic factor1 (Ga1), and Ga2, each play a key role in preventing hybridization between incompatible populations and are proposed to maintain the barrier between domesticated and wild subspecies. Each locus encodes both a silk-active and a matching pollen-active pectin methylesterase (PMEs). To investigate the diversity and molecular evolution of these gametophytic factor loci, we identified existing and improved models of the responsible genes in a new genome assembly of maize line P8860 that contains active versions of all three loci. We then examined fifty-two assembled genomes from seventeen species to classify haplotype diversity and identify sites under diversifying selection during the evolution of these genes. We show that Ga2, the oldest of these three loci, was duplicated to form Ga1 at least 12 million years ago. Tcb1, the youngest locus, arose as a duplicate of Ga1 before or around the time of diversification of the Zea genus. We find evidence of positive selection during evolution of the functional genes at an active site in the pollen-expressed PME and predicted surface sites in both the silk- and pollen-expressed PMEs. The most common allele at the Ga1 locus is a conserved ga1 allele (ga1-Off), which is specific haplotype containing three full-length PME gene copies, all of which are non-coding due to conserved stop codons and are between 610 thousand and 1.5 million years old. We show that the ga1-Off allele is associated with and likely generates 24-nt siRNAs in developing pollen-producing tissue, and these siRNAs map to functional Ga1 alleles. In previously-published crosses, the ga1-Off allele was associated with reduced function of the typically dominant functional alleles for the Ga1 and Tcb1 barriers. Taken together, this seems to be an example of a type of epigenetic trans-homolog silencing known as paramutation functioning at a locus controlling a reproductive barrier.

Authors: Elli Cryan, Garnet Phinney, Arun S. Seetharam, Matthew M.S. Evans, Elizabeth A. Kellogg, Junpeng Zhan, Blake C. Meyers, Daniel Kliebenstein, Jeffrey Ross-Ibarra

Last Update: 2024-12-17 00:00:00

Language: English

Source URL: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.12.02.626474

Source PDF: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.12.02.626474.full.pdf

Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.

Thank you to biorxiv for use of its open access interoperability.

Similar Articles