Listening to Our World: How Sounds Shape Us
Research shows how sounds influence our feelings and behavior.
Claudia Montero-Ramírez, Esther Rituerto-González, Carmen Peláez-Moreno
― 6 min read
Table of Contents
- What Are Acoustic Scenes?
- The Challenge of Real-World Data
- The Real-World Sound Dataset
- Detecting Sounds: Making Sense of the Noise
- Transforming Sound Into Meaningful Data
- Getting Deeper with Variational Autoencoders
- Real-World Analysis: The Good, the Bad, and the Noisy
- The "Where" of Sound Data
- Lessons from Acoustic Scene Analysis
- What’s Next in Acoustic Research?
- Original Source
- Reference Links
In our daily lives, we are constantly surrounded by sounds. These sounds come from various places like parks, busy streets, or even quiet rooms. Researchers are now working on understanding these sounds better, especially how they relate to our feelings and behavior. This article will break down some interesting research on how to analyze sounds from the real world and what they mean for us.
What Are Acoustic Scenes?
Think of an acoustic scene as the setting where different sounds can be heard. Imagine walking through a café, hearing people chatting, cups clinking, and maybe some music playing. This entire sound experience makes up the café's acoustic scene. These scenes can also evoke emotions in us. For example, a quiet forest might make you feel calm, while a crowded city street might make you feel a bit anxious.
Acoustic scenes can trigger memories and feelings. Researchers have been looking into how these sounds can help identify risky situations, like instances of gender-based violence. If certain sounds are linked to distress, identifying these could help prevent dangerous situations.
The Challenge of Real-World Data
To study these acoustic scenes, researchers use real-world recordings that capture sounds as they happen. They create databases filled with these audio recordings along with the places and situations they were recorded in. However, recording sounds in real life is not as simple as it sounds (pun intended).
For starters, the quality of audio can be affected by factors like background noise or equipment placement. Also, devices that track location use a lot of battery, leading to incomplete or inaccurate data. Sometimes, the recorded sounds can be a mix of things, making analysis tricky.
Dataset
The Real-World SoundResearchers have built a special dataset by collecting audio from volunteers in their daily lives. The data includes sounds, location information (like GPS coordinates), and even emotional labels based on how the volunteers felt at that moment. This dataset is valuable because it captures a diverse range of sounds and situations.
For instance, this dataset might include someone recording sounds at home, in a park, or while commuting. While analyzing these audio clips, researchers can learn how different environments affect our emotions. They aim to identify specific sounds that may indicate safety or danger.
Detecting Sounds: Making Sense of the Noise
To identify different sounds within these recordings, researchers use advanced algorithms. One of the popular models employed is called YAMNet. This model has been trained on a large database of sounds and can recognize various audio events like music, chatter, or traffic noise.
When examining audio data, YAMNet evaluates short sections of sound to determine what is happening. By analyzing each segment of sound, it can provide a clearer picture of the acoustic scene. The researchers then combine this information with other techniques to create a more comprehensive understanding of the audio landscape.
Transforming Sound Into Meaningful Data
Once the sounds are detected, the next step is to turn them into something useful. Researchers compare the sounds to methods used in text analysis, such as how we analyze words in a document. One such method is called TF-IDF. Imagine this as figuring out how important each sound is in a recording by looking at how frequently it's mentioned compared to all other sounds.
However, just counting sounds doesn’t tell the whole story. Researchers also want to understand the relationships between different sounds. To do this, they use another technique called Node2Vec. Think of it as mapping sounds in such a way that similar sounds are grouped together, just like how words with similar meanings might be found together in a thesaurus.
Variational Autoencoders
Getting Deeper withTo further refine their analysis, researchers use Variational Autoencoders (VAEs). This method helps create a simplified version of the sound data while keeping the important features intact. Using VAEs allows researchers to organize the audio information into a structured format that can highlight similarities and differences in acoustic scenes.
Imagine it like this: you have a huge box of crayons in every color imaginable. A VAE helps you group similar colors together, so you can easily find shades of blue or red without having to sift through the entire box. This structured approach helps researchers visualize and understand the vast amount of audio data they have collected.
Real-World Analysis: The Good, the Bad, and the Noisy
Taking audio recordings in the real world comes with its own set of challenges. Sound can be hard to classify due to background noise or the quality of the recordings. Sometimes, the sounds might get mixed up, making it difficult for algorithms to determine what they are.
Researchers noticed some sounds might be misclassified, which could skew the results. However, other methods, such as TF-IDF, help to minimize these issues by focusing on the context of sounds rather than just the sound itself.
The "Where" of Sound Data
Location plays a crucial role in understanding acoustic scenes. Researchers collect location data along with audio recordings to understand how different places influence what we hear and feel. However, due to GPS limitations, this data can often be imperfect. It might show you spent ten minutes in a café, but that doesn't mean you stayed in one spot for that long.
This can lead to what's called "pseudo-labeling," where the locations attached to the sounds may not be entirely accurate. Researchers acknowledge this and use these labels more as guides for analysis rather than as definitive markers for classification.
Lessons from Acoustic Scene Analysis
Researchers have dug deep into how to categorize sounds in the real world. They’ve shown that by focusing on the emotional context and the sounds present, they can get clearer insights into the acoustic scene. The interest here isn’t just in identifying sounds, but in understanding how they relate to our emotions and behaviors.
One key takeaway is that combining different methods, like sound detection models and information retrieval techniques, provides a well-rounded understanding of the audio landscape. Using approaches like TF-IDF and Node2Vec together paints a richer picture than using a single method alone.
What’s Next in Acoustic Research?
Looking ahead, researchers are keen to expand their studies on acoustic scenes. They aim to explore new models that could improve sound detection even further. As they collect more data, the understanding of how sounds affect emotions will also grow.
Eventually, researchers hope to integrate aspects of emotional analysis into their studies. With technology evolving, better tools are continuously becoming available, and the collaboration between sound analysis and emotional understanding is likely to grow.
In conclusion, the study of acoustic scenes in the real world is a fascinating field that holds the promise of better understanding how our environment affects our emotions and well-being. By combining various analysis techniques, researchers hope to not only categorize sounds but to proactively address potential risks in our daily lives. Who knew sounds could be so enlightening?
Title: Spatio-temporal Latent Representations for the Analysis of Acoustic Scenes in-the-wild
Abstract: In the field of acoustic scene analysis, this paper presents a novel approach to find spatio-temporal latent representations from in-the-wild audio data. By using WE-LIVE, an in-house collected dataset that includes audio recordings in diverse real-world environments together with sparse GPS coordinates, self-annotated emotional and situational labels, we tackle the challenging task of associating each audio segment with its corresponding location as a pretext task, with the final aim of acoustically detecting violent (anomalous) contexts, left as further work. By generating acoustic embeddings and using the self-supervised learning paradigm, we aim to use the model-generated latent space to acoustically characterize the spatio-temporal context. We use YAMNet, an acoustic events classifier trained in AudioSet to temporally locate and identify acoustic events in WE-LIVE. In order to transform the discrete acoustic events into embeddings, we compare the information-retrieval-based TF-IDF algorithm and Node2Vec as an analogy to Natural Language Processing techniques. A VAE is then trained to provide a further adapted latent space. The analysis was carried out by measuring the cosine distance and visualizing data distribution via t-Distributed Stochastic Neighbor Embedding, revealing distinct acoustic scenes. Specifically, we discern variations between indoor and subway environments. Notably, these distinctions emerge within the latent space of the VAE, a stark contrast to the random distribution of data points before encoding. In summary, our research contributes a pioneering approach for extracting spatio-temporal latent representations from in-the-wild audio data.
Authors: Claudia Montero-Ramírez, Esther Rituerto-González, Carmen Peláez-Moreno
Last Update: 2024-12-10 00:00:00
Language: English
Source URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.07648
Source PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2412.07648
Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.
Thank you to arxiv for use of its open access interoperability.
Reference Links
- https://dcase.community/challenge2021/task-acoustic-scene-classification
- https://www.uc3m.es/institute-gender-studies/UC3M4Safety
- https://www.uc3m.es/instituto-estudios-genero/EMPATIA
- https://doi.org/10.2143/iberspeech.2021-13
- https://www.jyu.fi/hytk/fi/laitokset/mutku/en/research/projects2/past-projects/coe/materials/emotion/soundtracks/Index
- https://github.com/tensorflow/models/tree/master/research/audioset/yamnet
- https://arxiv.org/abs/1912.10211
- https://dx.doi.org/10.1108/eb026526
- https://doi.org/10.1145/2939672.2939754
- https://towardsdatascience.com/word2vec-research-paper-explained-205cb7eecc30
- https://doi.org/10.3390/e23060747
- https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.00456
- https://doi.org/10.3390/app10062020
- https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.12300
- https://doi.org/10.1109/MSP.2014.2326181
- https://doi.org/10.21437/iberspeech.2022-19
- https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.06090
- https://github.com/tensorflow/models/tree/master/research/audioset/vggish
- https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01941
- https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17228534
- https://violenciagenero.igualdad.gob.es/violenciaEnCifras/macroencuesta2015/pdf/RE
- https://doi.org/10.13039/501100011033
- https://www.capitalone.com/tech/machine-learning/understanding-tf-idf/
- https://www.kdnuggets.com/2022/10/tfidf-defined.html
- https://github.com/ethanhezhao/NBVAE
- https://arxiv.org/abs/1912.08283
- https://pytorch.org/docs/stable/generated/torch.optim.SGD.html
- https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2021.3090866
- https://pytorch.org/docs/stable/generated/torch.optim.lr_scheduler.ExponentialLR.html
- https://doi.org/10.1109/ICBDA55095.2022.9760352
- https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228339739
- https://npitsillos.github.io/blog/2020/mnistvae/
- https://apiumhub.com/es/tech-blog-barcelona/reduccion-de-dimensionalidad-tsne/
- https://huggingface.co/nlptown/bert-base-multilingual-uncased-sentiment
- https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.17395
- https://www.veryfi.com/technology/zero-shot-learning/