Sci Simple

New Science Research Articles Everyday

# Computer Science # Cryptography and Security

Strengthening Cyber Defense with NIDS and MITRE ATT&CK

Learn how NIDS and advanced models boost cybersecurity efforts.

Nir Daniel, Florian Klaus Kaiser, Shay Giladi, Sapir Sharabi, Raz Moyal, Shalev Shpolyansky, Andres Murillo, Aviad Elyashar, Rami Puzis

― 6 min read


Cyber Defense Reinvented Cyber Defense Reinvented the next level. NIDS and AI tools take cybersecurity to
Table of Contents

In today's digital age, cyber threats are a common nightmare for businesses and individuals alike. One of the main tools used to fend off these threats is the Network Intrusion Detection System (NIDS). But with countless rules to follow, it can feel like finding a needle in a haystack. This is where labeling these rules using techniques from the MITRE ATT&CK framework comes in handy, making it easier for security analysts to interpret alerts and take action.

What is NIDS?

NIDS is like a security guard for your network. It keeps an eye on incoming and outgoing traffic, looking for suspicious activity that could be a sign of an attack. Think of it as a high-tech version of a neighborhood watch, alerting you whenever something seems off.

NIDS operates based on a set of rules. These rules are meant to flag potentially dangerous behaviors, much like how a metal detector beeps when it spots something metallic. However, not all rules are created equal. Some lack clarity, making it hard to know what kind of threat they are pointing at. This is where some clever data manipulation comes into play, namely the use of Machine Learning and Large Language Models.

The Importance of Clarity in NIDS Rules

Imagine receiving an alert from your NIDS, but having no idea what it means. It's like getting a text message in a language you don’t understand. This confusion can lead to missed threats or unnecessary alarm, which isn't good for anyone. By linking NIDS rules to specific attack techniques, analysts can better understand what’s going on.

This idea comes from the MITRE ATT&CK framework, a knowledge base of various tactics and techniques that cyber adversaries might use. Labeling NIDS rules according to this framework can drastically enhance the clarity and effectiveness of cyber threat interventions.

The Role of Machine Learning and Language Models

Now, here’s where things get interesting. Enter machine learning (ML) and large language models (LLMs). These technologies are like the fairy godmothers of cyber security, stepping in to help analysts make sense of all that data.

What is Machine Learning?

Machine learning is a branch of artificial intelligence (AI) where computers learn from data and improve their performance over time without being explicitly programmed. Imagine teaching a puppy to fetch. At first, it might not get it, but with enough practice and positive reinforcement, it becomes a pro.

Machine learning models can analyze massive amounts of data and help label those tricky NIDS rules. They are like over-caffeinated researchers running through an endless pile of information and providing quick, accurate labels for easier understanding.

Large Language Models

Large language models are AI systems trained to understand and generate human language. Think of them as the chatty friends who can help you rephrase your texts or clarify complicated definitions. They can read and summarize text with impressive accuracy.

In the context of cyber security, LLMs can tackle the tough job of linking NIDS rules to the MITRE ATT&CK techniques. They sift through data and provide explanations that even the least tech-savvy analyst can grasp.

A Study on NIDS Rule Labeling

In a recent exploration, researchers tested three prominent LLMs—ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini—against traditional machine learning methods. The goal? To see how well these models can label NIDS rules with associated MITRE ATT&CK techniques.

Setting the Scene

The study involved 973 Snort rules, which are a specific type of NIDS rule. Analysts wanted to see how well the models could explain and associate these rules with the tactics used by cyber bad guys. Would the LLMs hold their ground against traditional machine learning methods?

Findings

The results indicated that while LLMs made labeling easier and more scalable, traditional ML models delivered superior accuracy. It was like a friendly competition between two teams trying to outshine each other in a game of knowledge.

  1. Efficiency: LLMs generated explanations that were easy for analysts to follow, especially those newer to the field.
  2. Accuracy: Traditional machine learning models showcased impressive precision and recall, outperforming LLMs in accuracy metrics.

These findings hint at the potential of combining both technologies.

The Hybrid Approach to Cyber Security

The study suggests that using a combination of LLMs and machine learning models may be the most effective way to handle NIDS rules. This hybrid strategy allows analysts to benefit from the explainable insights of LLMs while leveraging the high precision of machine learning models.

Why Go Hybrid?

  1. Enhanced Understanding: Analysts can use LLMs to get explanations for complex techniques.
  2. Greater Accuracy: Rely on machine learning models to ensure the highest precision in labeling tasks.

Think of it as having a trusty sidekick. The sidekick might not be as strong as the hero, but their wit and charm save the day just as often!

Cyber Threat Intelligence (CTI)

Cyber Threat Intelligence is the art of collecting and analyzing threat data to make informed decisions about cybersecurity. It's like gathering intel for a mission before heading into battle.

Types of Cyber Threat Intelligence

CTI can be categorized into four types:

  1. Strategic CTI: This aims at executives and focuses on long-term trends and risks.
  2. Operational CTI: This is more detailed and helps security teams understand imminent threats.
  3. Tactical CTI: Known as TTPs (Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures), this provides insights into adversaries' methods.
  4. Technical CTI: This includes specific data, like IP addresses or file hashes, which must be reacted to quickly.

Understanding these types is crucial for efficiency at different levels of an organization.

The MITRE ATT&CK Framework

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is like the playbook for cyber threats. It lays out how attackers infiltrate and behave in networks. This resource helps defenders learn what to look out for.

Key Points about the MITRE Framework

  • It includes tactics (overall goals) and techniques (specific actions).
  • It covers various platforms, such as Windows, macOS, and Linux.
  • It consists of an ever-expanding list of techniques helping organizations to remain prepared against new threats.

Challenges in Cyber Security

Despite the advancements, several challenges continue to hinder effective cyber defense.

The Skill Gap

One significant issue is the shortage of experienced cybersecurity analysts. With the rapid evolution of threats, organizations find it tough to keep up.

Complexity of Rules

The sheer volume of NIDS rules and their often vague nature makes it challenging for analysts to discern which ones indicate real threats. It's a bit like trying to find a needle in a stack of needles!

Conclusion

As cyber threats evolve, enhancing our tools for defense becomes ever more critical. Using technologies like machine learning and large language models, organizations can make their cyber defense efforts more effective and manageable. Combining both approaches could provide a nice balance between clarity and accuracy, enabling analysts to better protect their networks.

In the end, embracing innovation while remaining grounded in solid data practices will pave the way for more secure digital environments. Keep your systems updated, your analysts trained, and always remain one step ahead of potential threats!

Original Source

Title: Labeling NIDS Rules with MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: Machine Learning vs. Large Language Models

Abstract: Analysts in Security Operations Centers (SOCs) are often occupied with time-consuming investigations of alerts from Network Intrusion Detection Systems (NIDS). Many NIDS rules lack clear explanations and associations with attack techniques, complicating the alert triage and the generation of attack hypotheses. Large Language Models (LLMs) may be a promising technology to reduce the alert explainability gap by associating rules with attack techniques. In this paper, we investigate the ability of three prominent LLMs (ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini) to reason about NIDS rules while labeling them with MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques. We discuss prompt design and present experiments performed with 973 Snort rules. Our results indicate that while LLMs provide explainable, scalable, and efficient initial mappings, traditional Machine Learning (ML) models consistently outperform them in accuracy, achieving higher precision, recall, and F1-scores. These results highlight the potential for hybrid LLM-ML approaches to enhance SOC operations and better address the evolving threat landscape.

Authors: Nir Daniel, Florian Klaus Kaiser, Shay Giladi, Sapir Sharabi, Raz Moyal, Shalev Shpolyansky, Andres Murillo, Aviad Elyashar, Rami Puzis

Last Update: 2024-12-14 00:00:00

Language: English

Source URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.10978

Source PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2412.10978

Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/

Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.

Thank you to arxiv for use of its open access interoperability.

Similar Articles