The Financial Impact of COVID-19 Vaccination in Canada
COVID-19 vaccines save lives and money in Canada’s health system.
Alison E. Simmons, Rafael N. Miranda, Michael W.Z. Li, Gebremedhin B. Gebretekle, Min Xi, Marina I. Salvadori, Bryna Warshawsky, Eva Wong, Raphael Ximenes, Melissa K. Andrew, Sarah Wilson, Matthew Tunis, Ashleigh R. Tuite
― 7 min read
Table of Contents
- Vaccination Benefits
- Where Are We Now?
- Government Advice on Vaccination
- Money Matters
- Analyzing Costs and Health Outcomes
- How the Model Works
- Understanding Vaccine Effectiveness
- The Numbers Game
- How Many Need to Be Vaccinated?
- Cost-A-Brewin’
- Sensitivity and Scenario Analyses
- What Happens Next?
- Insights into Populations
- Limitations to Consider
- Final Thoughts
- Original Source
The COVID-19 pandemic has changed the way we look at vaccines. These shots became essential tools in our fight against the virus, helping to prevent illness and save lives. In Canada, the COVID-19 vaccination program has had a significant financial impact, saving billions by keeping people healthy and out of the hospital. Let’s break down what this means in simpler terms without getting too bogged down in science mumbo-jumbo.
Vaccination Benefits
From December 2020 to March 2022, Canada’s vaccination campaign saved a lot of money by preventing early Deaths and reducing sickness. In fact, the program is estimated to have saved a mind-boggling amount of money—think in the tens to hundreds of billions of dollars! That’s a lot of cash saved, which can be used for other important stuff, like ensuring Tim Hortons has enough coffee for everyone.
Where Are We Now?
As of now, COVID-19 isn’t just a pandemic anymore; it’s become what we call endemic. This means it’s here to stay, but it doesn’t get as crazy all at once like before. However, COVID-19 doesn’t follow a set pattern like other viruses, such as the seasonal flu. Those pesky germs seem to pop up at odd times, making it harder to predict when they’ll strike.
With this unpredictability, the cost-effectiveness of ongoing Vaccinations isn’t as clear as it was during the pandemic. It's like trying to catch a train that doesn’t run on a schedule—frustrating and confusing!
Government Advice on Vaccination
The National Advisory Committee on Immunization (NACI) has been the go-to group for advice on who should get their COVID-19 shots. For the fall of 2024, they recommend vaccinating people aged 65 and older, as well as those aged between 6 months to 64 years who have a greater risk of getting really sick from COVID-19. For those at average risk, they suggest getting a shot if they feel like it.
As for spring 2025, the recommendations haven’t been issued yet, but expect similar advice—older folks and those in special circumstances should get their vaccines.
Money Matters
Before 2025, the Canadian government covered the costs of all COVID-19 vaccines. After that, provinces and territories will need to pay for vaccines themselves, which has led to discussions about how valuable these shots really are. It’s like having a subscription to your favorite streaming service: you want to make sure you’re getting your money's worth!
Analyzing Costs and Health Outcomes
To figure out if continuing COVID-19 vaccinations is worth it, experts conducted a cost-utility analysis. This means they compared the potential benefits of getting vaccinated against the costs involved. They looked at two main strategies: one where people were vaccinated under current recommendations, and another where no one got vaccinated at all. The team used a model to find out how many people would get sick or die without vaccination.
How the Model Works
The researchers created a simulation that used data from about one million people, sorted by age and health risks. They classified people into two groups: those with chronic medical conditions (higher risk) and those without (average risk). This helped them see how each group would fare without a vaccination program.
Health states were established to track how people’s health would change based on their vaccination status. They kept track of possible transitions to serious illness or death. Don’t worry, though; the model didn’t involve any creepy sci-fi elements!
Understanding Vaccine Effectiveness
To get a handle on vaccine effectiveness, the team used data from previous studies, ensuring they mostly relied on information from Canada. They had to make some educated guesses when information wasn’t available, so don’t think they were just tossing darts at a board!
The analysis aimed to estimate how many COVID-19 cases could be avoided with vaccination. They looked closely at both outpatient and inpatient care to gauge the health impact.
The Numbers Game
When the researchers compared the “no vaccination” scenario to the current vaccination recommendations, they found some eye-opening numbers. Without vaccination, they expected thousands of outpatient cases, Hospitalizations, and even some deaths in a population of one million people. But with the vaccination program in place, they found that it would reduce these numbers considerably.
In fact, the current vaccination strategy could reduce outpatient cases by about 3.1%, hospitalizations by 8.8%, and deaths by 9.4%!
How Many Need to Be Vaccinated?
The researchers calculated how many people would need to get vaccinated to prevent one case of severe illness or death. Spoiler: it’s quite a few! For every outpatient case prevented, they estimated about 50 people need to be vaccinated. In terms of hospitalizations, it was about 1,121 people per hospitalization prevented. Even more people were needed to prevent one death, especially for younger groups who are generally healthier.
Cost-A-Brewin’
When looking at costs for the health system, the vaccination program would result in additional costs of about $4.695 million but would also gain around 221 Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALYs). The ICER, a fancy term for cost-effectiveness, came out to about $21,227 per QALY when considering just health system costs.
From a societal perspective, costs were a bit higher, landing at around $5.721 million, but the additional health benefits remained significant. To put it simply: spending money on vaccines could actually save health care costs down the line. It’s almost like buying insurance—better to have it and not need it than the other way around!
Sensitivity and Scenario Analyses
The researchers also did some scenario analyses to test different conditions and assumptions about vaccine effectiveness, costs, and how likely people were to get vaccinated. Some scenarios showed that there could be lower costs per QALY, while others indicated the opposite.
One of the biggest takeaways was that higher vaccine prices would make the vaccination program less cost-effective. If the price of the vaccine is similar to that in the United States, it could exceed the typically used cost-effectiveness threshold, raising some eyebrows.
What Happens Next?
If COVID-19 continues to be unpredictable, public health agencies need to adapt their strategies. Aligning vaccination timing with seasonal spikes in cases could be more efficient but is challenging due to various factors. It’s like trying to hit a moving target while riding a unicycle—tricky business!
Insights into Populations
This evaluation focused mainly on those at higher risk. They determined that older adults benefit the most from vaccines, which is something to remember when planning future vaccination strategies. If you want to save resources, focusing on the most vulnerable groups has proven to be the smarter route!
Limitations to Consider
As with any research, this analysis had its limitations. The researchers made some assumptions that could change with evolving virus strains, and their method didn’t include certain groups recommended for vaccination. So even though they did a thorough job, there are still more questions out there.
Final Thoughts
In conclusion, COVID-19 vaccination remains a worthwhile investment for Canada. While there are uncertainties about future virus behavior and vaccine prices, the potential benefits of continuing vaccination far outweigh the costs. Plus, who doesn’t want to keep their fellow Canucks healthy and happy? With continued attention to vaccination efforts, Canada can take steps forward in managing COVID-19 even in its endemic state.
So raise your glass, or perhaps a coffee cup, to the ongoing efforts to keep COVID-19 in check!
Original Source
Title: Cost-utility analysis of current COVID-19 vaccination program recommendations in Canada
Abstract: BackgroundAs COVID-19 becomes established as an endemic disease with widespread population immunity, there is uncertainty about the economic benefit of ongoing COVID-19 vaccination programs. We assessed the cost-effectiveness of a COVID-19 vaccination program similar to current Canadian recommendations, modelled as annual vaccination for people aged less than 65 years with chronic medical conditions and biannual vaccination for adults aged 65 years and older. MethodsUsing a static individual-based model of medically attended COVID-19 in a population of 1 million people, we estimated costs (in 2023 Canadian dollars), quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). We used health system and societal perspectives and a 1.5% discount rate. Parameters were based on recent COVID-19 epidemiology, vaccine characteristics, and costs. ResultsBetween July 2024 and September 2025, a program similar to current Canadian recommendations was estimated to avert 3.1% (95% credible interval (CrI): 3.0 to 3.2%) of outpatient cases, 8.8% (95% CrI: 7.3 to 10.4%) of inpatient cases, 3.6% (95% CrI: 2.8 to 4.3%) of PCC cases, and 9.4% (95% CrI: 5.6 to 13.8%) of deaths compared to no vaccination. The number needed to vaccinate to prevent one hospitalization and one death was 1,121 (95% CrI: 941 to 1,357) and 8,656 (95% CrI: 5,848 to 14,915), respectively. For the health system perspective, the program would cost an additional $4.695 million but result in 221.17 QALYs gained, leading to an ICER of $21,227 per QALY compared to no vaccination. Vaccine price influenced cost-effectiveness, with higher prices reducing the likelihood the program met common cost-effectiveness thresholds. ConclusionsA program similar to current COVID-19 recommendations in Canada is likely effective and cost-effective compared to no vaccination. However, unlike some other research studies, alternate vaccination strategies that may offer better value for money were not evaluated.
Authors: Alison E. Simmons, Rafael N. Miranda, Michael W.Z. Li, Gebremedhin B. Gebretekle, Min Xi, Marina I. Salvadori, Bryna Warshawsky, Eva Wong, Raphael Ximenes, Melissa K. Andrew, Sarah Wilson, Matthew Tunis, Ashleigh R. Tuite
Last Update: 2024-12-14 00:00:00
Language: English
Source URL: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.12.13.24318988
Source PDF: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.12.13.24318988.full.pdf
Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.
Thank you to medrxiv for use of its open access interoperability.