COVID-19 Vaccination Strategies in Canada
An overview of Canada's COVID-19 vaccination efforts and their effectiveness.
Rafael N. Miranda, Alison E. Simmons, Michael W.Z. Li, Gebremedhin B. Gebretekle, Min Xi, Marina I. Salvadori, Bryna Warshawsky, Eva Wong, Raphael Ximenes, Melissa K. Andrew, Beate Sander, Davinder Singh, Sarah Wilson, Matthew Tunis, Ashleigh R. Tuite
― 5 min read
Table of Contents
- The COVID-19 Pandemic's Toll
- Importance of Vaccination
- Shifting Responsibilities
- Focus on Cost-Effectiveness
- Recommendations for Vaccination
- The Model of Vaccination Strategy
- The Population Model
- Understanding Costs and Benefits
- Vaccination Strategies Under Review
- Results of the Analysis
- Sensitivity and Scenario Analyses
- Considering the Impact of Vaccination Strategies
- Comparing Different Vaccination Strategies
- Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
- Optimal Strategies Based on Costs
- Conclusion: The Future of COVID-19 Vaccination in Canada
- Original Source
Since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2019, the world has faced a major health challenge. The virus, SARS-CoV-2, has led to millions of deaths and countless cases of illness. As we move through 2024, the impact of COVID-19 is still felt, especially among those most at risk, like older adults and individuals with weakened immune systems. This overview aims to break down the current state of COVID-19 vaccination efforts in Canada, focusing on the importance of targeted vaccination strategies and their cost-effectiveness.
The COVID-19 Pandemic's Toll
COVID-19 has not been kind. More than 7 million deaths have been reported worldwide, with over 60,000 deaths in Canada alone. While the initial emergency phase has passed, the virus continues to pose a threat, particularly to higher-risk groups. As such, protecting these individuals remains a key focus for health authorities.
Importance of Vaccination
Vaccination against COVID-19 has proven to be a lifesaver. Between December 2020 and March 2022, it's estimated that vaccines saved around 500,000 lives in Canada and saved the country a whopping $220 billion in healthcare costs. However, as time goes on, immunity from vaccines and previous infections may wane. This leads to the need for booster shots to maintain protection against the virus.
Shifting Responsibilities
Up until 2025, vaccines were obtained through federal programs in Canada, with the government covering the costs. Starting in 2025, provinces and territories will have the responsibility of buying COVID-19 vaccines, which adds a new layer of complexity to the vaccination strategy.
Focus on Cost-Effectiveness
With limited healthcare resources, the way provinces and territories allocate funds for vaccination programs becomes crucial. Evaluating different vaccination strategies will help in designing effective and cost-efficient programs. This is especially important as different groups benefit differently from vaccination, with younger and healthier individuals at lower risk for severe outcomes.
Recommendations for Vaccination
As of fall 2024, Canada's National Advisory Committee on Immunization (NACI) has laid out clear guidelines. They strongly recommend annual Vaccinations for people aged 65 and older, as well as those between 6 months and 64 years who are at a higher risk for severe illness. For those at lower risk, vaccination is advised on a more discretionary basis. NACI also suggests that some high-risk Populations should consider receiving two doses a year.
The Model of Vaccination Strategy
To analyze the effectiveness of vaccination strategies in Canada, a model was created that looked at the costs and benefits of various approaches. This model covers a period from July 2024 to September 2025, allowing for a comprehensive view of vaccination impacts over time.
The Population Model
The model simulated a population of one million individuals, divided by age and medical risk. The higher risk group included individuals with chronic medical conditions, while others were categorized as average risk. This division helps in understanding how vaccination can impact different segments of the population.
Understanding Costs and Benefits
In assessing the costs associated with COVID-19 and the benefits of vaccination, various important factors were considered. This includes estimated costs related to hospital stays, outpatient care, and the impact of deaths due to the virus. Also measured were the quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), which help quantify the health benefits of vaccination.
Vaccination Strategies Under Review
A series of vaccination strategies were analyzed to see which would be the most effective. The strategies ranged from no additional vaccination to more inclusive plans that covered all adults aged 50 and older. Each strategy's costs and health outcomes were measured to find the best approach.
Results of the Analysis
The analysis showed that annual vaccination for people 65 years and older resulted in a cost-effectiveness ratio of $7,828 per QALY. However, expanding this to include a second dose for those older adults increased costs significantly. The most expensive strategies involved including younger populations at higher risk, leading to very high cost-effectiveness ratios.
Sensitivity and Scenario Analyses
To ensure that the results were reliable, various sensitivity analyses were conducted. This included adjusting the vaccine prices and estimating different COVID-19 incidence rates. These analyses helped shape a more complete understanding of how changes in strategy might impact outcomes.
Considering the Impact of Vaccination Strategies
Without vaccination, the model estimated a high number of outpatient cases, Hospitalizations, cases of post-COVID condition, and deaths per 100,000 people. However, the introduction of vaccination strategies could significantly reduce these numbers, particularly for hospitalizations and deaths.
Comparing Different Vaccination Strategies
Vaccination strategies that included older adults had a larger impact on preventing severe outcomes than those targeting an entire younger population. As more groups were added to the vaccination strategy, the number of cases averted increased, although the number of individuals needing to be vaccinated also grew.
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
The most cost-effective strategy remained annual vaccination for adults 65 years and older. As more age groups were included or a second dose was added, the cost-effectiveness decreased, often exceeding the commonly accepted threshold for cost-effectiveness.
Optimal Strategies Based on Costs
When looking at costs, it was found that strategic planning regarding vaccine pricing was essential. Annual vaccinations for older adults remained cost-effective even when prices increased significantly. Lower vaccine prices opened the door for broader vaccination strategies to become feasible.
Conclusion: The Future of COVID-19 Vaccination in Canada
Despite uncertainties surrounding the pandemic and the evolution of the virus, COVID-19 vaccination programs remain a smart strategy for protecting public health in Canada. Targeting high-risk populations and aligning vaccine distribution with times of high transmission is crucial for maximizing benefits.
Vaccination not only protects individuals but reduces the overall burden on healthcare systems. The ongoing evaluation of vaccination strategies is vital for adapting to changing circumstances and ensuring that resources are used efficiently.
In a world where health can sometimes feel like a game of “Whac-A-Mole”, it's crucial to stay ahead of the virus and ensure that vaccines reach those who need them most. It seems that a shot (or two) may just be the ticket to a healthier future, living happily ever after—at least until the next virus shows up!
Original Source
Title: Cost-utility analysis of COVID-19 vaccination strategies for endemic SARS-CoV-2 circulation in Canada
Abstract: BackgroundWith shifting epidemiology and changes in the vaccine funding landscape, resource use considerations for ongoing COVID-19 vaccination programs are increasingly important. We assessed the cost-effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccination programs, where eligibility is defined by combinations of age and chronic medical conditions, including a strategy similar to current Canadian recommendations, from the health system and societal perspectives. MethodsWe used a static, individual-based probabilistic model simulating medically attended COVID-19 in a population of 1 million people followed over a 15-month time period to estimate costs in 2023 Canadian dollars, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost- effectiveness ratios (ICERs), discounted at 1.5%. COVID-19 epidemiology, vaccine characteristics, and costs were based on the most recently available data. ResultsAnnual vaccination for adults aged 65 years and older consistently emerged as a cost- effective intervention, with ICERs less than $50,000 per QALY compared to no vaccination for a range of model assumptions. Adding a second dose for adults aged 65 years and older or expanding programs to include vaccination for younger age groups, including those at higher risk of COVID-19 due to chronic medical conditions, generally resulted in ICERs of greater than $50,000 per QALY. Shifting timing of vaccination programs to better align with periods of high COVID-19 case occurrence could result in biannual vaccination for those aged 65 and older being a cost-effective strategy. ConclusionsCOVID-19 vaccination programs may be cost-effective when focused on groups at higher risk of disease. Optimal timing of vaccination could improve the cost-effectiveness of various strategies.
Authors: Rafael N. Miranda, Alison E. Simmons, Michael W.Z. Li, Gebremedhin B. Gebretekle, Min Xi, Marina I. Salvadori, Bryna Warshawsky, Eva Wong, Raphael Ximenes, Melissa K. Andrew, Beate Sander, Davinder Singh, Sarah Wilson, Matthew Tunis, Ashleigh R. Tuite
Last Update: 2024-12-20 00:00:00
Language: English
Source URL: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.12.06.24318620
Source PDF: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.12.06.24318620.full.pdf
Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.
Thank you to medrxiv for use of its open access interoperability.