Simple Science

Cutting edge science explained simply

# Physics # High Energy Physics - Phenomenology # High Energy Physics - Experiment

Chasing the Shy Particles: A Deep Dive into LLPs

Researchers are uncovering secrets of long-lived particles in particle physics.

Louie Corpe, Thomas Chehab, Andreas Goudelis

― 5 min read


Hunting Long-Lived Hunting Long-Lived Particles in particle discovery. ATLAS collaboration pushes boundaries
Table of Contents

In the world of particle physics, researchers at the ATLAS experiment are on the hunt for unusual particles that could reveal secrets about the universe. One such exciting area of research involves Long-Lived Particles, or LLPs. These particles have a unique way of decaying that can produce strange signatures in detectors. The ATLAS collaboration has been particularly interested in how these LLPs behave when they decay in the calorimeters, the parts of the detector that measure energy and particles.

What are Long-Lived Particles?

Long-lived particles are like the shy kids at a party. They don't decay immediately but stick around for a while before revealing themselves. When they finally do decay, they can produce jets-funnel-like sprays of particles-that can end up far from where the original collision occurred. These “displaced jets” can be tricky to spot, which is why dedicated searches are necessary.

The Challenge of Finding LLPs

Finding LLPs is not as easy as waving a magic wand. Traditional searches in particle physics are designed for particles that decay promptly, meaning they happen quickly and leave clear signals. However, LLPs could provide critical insights into hidden sectors of physics, which are areas beyond our current understanding of the standard model.

To analyze LLPs effectively, scientists use a method called recasting. This involves taking existing data from searches and reinterpreting it to apply to new models or scenarios. The ATLAS collaboration has provided resources for researchers to do this with their EXOT-2019-23 search.

The EXOT-2019-23 Search

The EXOT-2019-23 search focused on neutral LLPs that decay inside the calorimeter. By using a full dataset from the second run of the ATLAS project, scientists developed a method for linking the physics of these decays to a selection probability for events in the detector. This selection probability is calculated using an efficiency map, which is essentially a handy cheat sheet that helps researchers understand how likely it is for a certain event to be observed based on some known parameters.

Efficiency Maps: The Key Ingredient

Think of the efficiency map like a restaurant menu. It doesn't tell you how the food is made, but it gives you an idea of what to expect. In the case of the efficiency map, it takes input variables such as where the particle decayed and how fast it was moving. It then outputs a probability for that event being selected for further analysis.

How the Validation Works

To validate this map, researchers compared the results obtained using it with those from the original ATLAS analysis. They focused on two sets of benchmark models based on the "Hidden Abelian Higgs Model." This model serves as a guide, allowing scientists to generate events in a controlled way and subsequently evaluate their efficiencies.

The validation process involved generating event samples, applying the efficiency map, and comparing those results with what the ATLAS collaboration published. By doing this, researchers could check if the map works accurately and reliably.

Importance of the Validation

Validation is vital because it ensures the map isn't just a pretty picture-it's a useful tool for physicists trying to learn more about these shy long-lived particles. If the map provides good results, researchers can confidently use it to reinterpret existing data for different models.

Results of the Validation

The results showed that the efficiency map performed well for high-mass particles. When comparing the map-derived efficiencies to the original findings from ATLAS, there was a solid agreement, which is like finding out that your favorite pizza place still makes a delicious pepperoni pie just the way you like it.

However, the map's performance dropped for lower mass particles. In essence, it struggled to keep pace, akin to a puppy trying to catch a squirrel. This discrepancy is important because it suggests that while the map is a helpful tool, it may need some tweaks for certain scenarios.

The Cross-Section Limits

Along with efficiency, researchers also looked at cross-section limits, which measure the likelihood of particle interactions. Using the efficiency map, they calculated these limits and compared them to the original ATLAS results. They found similar trends, proving that the map was a good approximation for understanding event selection.

Potential Pitfalls and Improvements

Like all tools, the efficiency map is not without its shortcomings. It relies on assumptions that may not always hold true. For instance, the map assumes the distribution of LLPs follows a certain pattern. If a new model behaves differently, it could lead to inaccuracies.

Researchers also pointed out that the map does not consider variations in decay processes, which can affect results. Additionally, it assumes new models will pass certain selection criteria, which may not always be the case.

The Need for Clarity in Data Sharing

One of the key takeaways from this study is that transparency is essential. Clear documentation is vital for enabling other researchers to replicate results and utilize existing datasets effectively. It’s like having a recipe: the better the instructions, the tastier the final dish.

A User-Friendly Approach

It would be fantastic if the efficiency map could be provided in a format that’s easy for external users to understand and use. The idea is to have something akin to an instruction manual that guides scientists through the process of utilizing these maps efficiently.

Conclusion

In summary, the ATLAS search for LLPs and the use of efficiency maps represent an exciting frontier in particle physics. While the challenge of discovering these shy particles remains, tools like the efficiency map help bridge the gap between complex data and practical applications.

By validating these maps and continually refining methods, researchers can better interpret existing data and unlock further mysteries of the universe. Who knows, maybe one day they’ll finally discover what those shy particles have been hiding all along. And if not, at least they’ll have a pretty good pizza along the way.

Original Source

Title: Notes on recasting the ATLAS-EXOT-2019-23 search for pairs of displaced hadronic jets in the ATLAS calorimeter

Abstract: This note describes the validation of material allowing the reinterpretation of an ATLAS search for decays of pair-produced neutral long-lived particles decaying in the hadronic part of the calorimeter, or at the edge of the electromagnetic calorimeter, using the full Run-2 ATLAS dataset. This reinterpretation material includes an efficiency map linking truth-level kinematic information (decay position, transverse momentum and decay products of the LLPs) to the probability of the reconstructed event being selected in the analysis signal region. In this document we describe the validation procedure, i.e. how the map was used to recover the limits presented in the ATLAS publication using events generated with MadGraph5_aMC@NLO and hadronised using Pythia8, and we identify some limitations of this approach. We moreover comment upon issues concerning the validation procedure itself, in particular with regards to whether or not the information included in the existing, published material allows for an external user to test recasting methods.

Authors: Louie Corpe, Thomas Chehab, Andreas Goudelis

Last Update: Dec 18, 2024

Language: English

Source URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.13976

Source PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2412.13976

Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.

Thank you to arxiv for use of its open access interoperability.

Similar Articles