Sci Simple

New Science Research Articles Everyday

# Computer Science # Computation and Language # Artificial Intelligence

Revolutionizing Student Engagement Measurement with LLM-SEM

A new method combines video metrics and sentiment analysis for better engagement insights.

Ali Hamdi, Ahmed Abdelmoneim Mazrou, Mohamed Shaltout

― 5 min read


Measuring Engagement with Measuring Engagement with LLM-SEM engagement effectively. A new method evaluates student
Table of Contents

In the age of online learning, platforms such as YouTube have changed how students interact with educational materials. However, measuring how engaged students are remains complicated. Traditional methods like surveys often run into issues such as small sample sizes and limited feedback. Meanwhile, automated systems face challenges in interpreting mixed emotions in comments. So, how do we get a clearer picture of student engagement? Well, it seems science has come up with a clever solution.

The Need for a New Approach

Simply asking students how they feel about a course isn't enough, especially when the replies are often unclear or inconsistent. As online education grows, the need for a more effective way to analyze student engagement becomes pressing. Automated systems, while better than traditional surveys, still have their own limitations.

For starters, they often struggle with vague comments and rely on minimal data. Essentially, we need something that combines the best of both worlds: qualitative comments and quantitative data, all while being scalable to handle a large number of students.

Enter LLM-SEM: The Student Engagement Metric

To tackle these challenges, researchers have introduced a new method called LLM-SEM, which stands for Language Model-Based Student Engagement Metric. This approach cleverly mixes video metadata—like views and likes—with sentiment analysis of student comments. By doing this, LLM-SEM aims to deliver a better measure of how engaged students really are, across both courses and individual lessons.

How Does LLM-SEM Work?

The process behind LLM-SEM involves several steps, starting from collecting data to analyzing it. Here's a breakdown:

  1. Data Collection: All the relevant data is gathered from online educational platforms. This includes playlists, videos, and comments, organized into an easy-to-understand format.

  2. Metadata Extraction: Important details like the number of views, likes, and even the length of the videos are extracted. These figures help in measuring how popular or engaging a piece of content is.

  3. Sentiment Analysis: This is where the magic happens. Comments left by students are analyzed to understand their feelings about the course or lesson. Are they happy? Confused? This part of the process uses advanced language models to get a clearer sense of sentiment.

  4. Polarity Scoring: Once sentiment is analyzed, each comment gets a score that indicates whether it is positive, negative, or neutral. This score helps gauge overall student satisfaction.

  5. Feature Normalization: To make sure that all the data can be compared fairly, various features like views and likes are normalized. This step ensures that they are treated equally, regardless of the differences in numbers across various videos.

  6. Engagement Metric Calculation: Finally, all the data comes together to compute a single engagement score. This score provides a comprehensive view of student engagement, combining both quantitative metrics and qualitative insights.

Why Should We Care About LLM-SEM?

By now, you might be wondering why all this matters. Well, think of it this way: if you're trying to bake a cake, you wouldn't just guess the ingredients based on smell, right? You'd want to measure everything out properly. The same logic applies here. Having a solid engagement metric allows educators and content creators to see which parts of their material are working well and which parts need some serious sprucing up.

The Role of Language Models in Sentiment Analysis

Now, let's talk about the brain behind this operation: language models. These advanced algorithms help in breaking down and analyzing comments to determine sentiment. They've taken things to a whole new level when it comes to understanding the nuances existing in human language.

Popular language models like RoBERTa and more recent ones such as LLama and Gemma have shown impressive performance when applied to sentiment analysis. They are trained on vast amounts of data and can handle the trickiest of comments.

Experimental Results and Findings

As part of the research, various language models were tested to see which one could best analyze sentiment. The results revealed some interesting findings:

  • The fine-tuned RoBERTa outshined the rest, delivering the best accuracy and performance metrics. It demonstrated a special knack for interpreting student comments accurately.
  • Gemma was also impressive but found it challenging to determine neutral sentiments.
  • LLama struggled a bit more than the others, especially when dealing with mixed sentiments.

In the world of sentiment analysis, distinguishing between positive, negative, and neutral comments is often no walk in the park. Even the best models have trouble figuring out indeterminate sentiments.

Applications of LLM-SEM in Education

So, how can LLM-SEM be practically applied? One way is by helping educators get insightful feedback on their teaching methods. By systematically analyzing student sentiment across different videos and courses, teachers can identify what resonates well with their students and what might need to be reconsidered. This allows for smarter content creation that speaks directly to student needs, leading to higher engagement.

Furthermore, content creators on platforms like YouTube can use these insights to tailor their educational videos better. Knowing which topics spark interest or confusion can guide creators in enhancing their material, ultimately leading to a richer learning experience.

Conclusion

In summary, measuring student engagement in online education is more crucial than ever. Traditional methods are starting to show their age, and the introduction of methods like LLM-SEM represents a step in the right direction. By combining sentiment analysis with video metadata, LLM-SEM facilitates a comprehensive view of student engagement, giving educators and content creators the tools they need to improve their offerings.

As e-learning continues to grow, using advanced metrics will become increasingly important to ensure that educational content not only reaches students but also keeps them engaged. With LLM-SEM on the scene, we might just be able to achieve a more vibrant educational landscape for everyone involved.

So, if you ever hear someone say, “I learned nothing from that video,” think of LLM-SEM, the new superhero in the realm of online education, swooping in to save the day by measuring engagement like never before!

Original Source

Title: LLM-SEM: A Sentiment-Based Student Engagement Metric Using LLMS for E-Learning Platforms

Abstract: Current methods for analyzing student engagement in e-learning platforms, including automated systems, often struggle with challenges such as handling fuzzy sentiment in text comments and relying on limited metadata. Traditional approaches, such as surveys and questionnaires, also face issues like small sample sizes and scalability. In this paper, we introduce LLM-SEM (Language Model-Based Student Engagement Metric), a novel approach that leverages video metadata and sentiment analysis of student comments to measure engagement. By utilizing recent Large Language Models (LLMs), we generate high-quality sentiment predictions to mitigate text fuzziness and normalize key features such as views and likes. Our holistic method combines comprehensive metadata with sentiment polarity scores to gauge engagement at both the course and lesson levels. Extensive experiments were conducted to evaluate various LLM models, demonstrating the effectiveness of LLM-SEM in providing a scalable and accurate measure of student engagement. We fine-tuned TXLM-RoBERTa using human-annotated sentiment datasets to enhance prediction accuracy and utilized LLama 3B, and Gemma 9B from Ollama.

Authors: Ali Hamdi, Ahmed Abdelmoneim Mazrou, Mohamed Shaltout

Last Update: 2024-12-19 00:00:00

Language: English

Source URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.13765

Source PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2412.13765

Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.

Thank you to arxiv for use of its open access interoperability.

More from authors

Similar Articles