Connecting the Dots in Breast Cancer Research
Investigating risk factors for breast cancer using innovative data analysis techniques.
Marina Vabistsevits, Tim Robinson, Ben Elsworth, Yi Liu, Tom R Gaunt
― 6 min read
Table of Contents
- What is Triangulation?
- The Challenge of Data Integration
- EpiGraphDB: A Key Tool
- What is Mendelian Randomization?
- Literature-Based Discovery: Mining for Clues
- The Case Studies: Childhood Body Size and HDL-Cholesterol
- Childhood Body Size
- HDL-Cholesterol
- Building a Comprehensive Picture
- Limitations and Challenges
- The Future of Research
- Conclusion
- Original Source
- Reference Links
Breast cancer is a disease that affects many individuals around the globe. Understanding the factors that contribute to breast cancer is crucial for prevention and treatment efforts. In recent years, researchers have started to investigate various risk factors, which can range from genetic traits to lifestyle choices. In this context, researchers have developed new ways to analyze and combine different sources of information to identify these risk factors and their relationships to breast cancer.
Triangulation?
What isTriangulation is a term that refers to using different methods or sources of data to gather evidence on a specific topic. When it comes to health research, especially population health, triangulation can boost confidence in the findings. By comparing various pieces of information and looking for common trends, researchers can get a clearer picture of how certain factors might influence breast cancer risk.
Imagine trying to solve a mystery. If you only have one witness, your perspective might be limited. But if you talk to several witnesses, you can piece together a more comprehensive story. That's what triangulation does in research!
The Challenge of Data Integration
One of the main hurdles researchers face is managing the huge amounts of data gathered from various sources. Data can come from studies, literature, or genetic information. Mixing and matching these different types of data is no small task. It sometimes feels like trying to fit a square peg into a round hole! This is why researchers have created several platforms to help bring these datasets together in a meaningful way.
One such platform is EpiGraphDB, which acts as a biomedical knowledge graph. It helps researchers mine epidemiological relationships, combining genetic and lifestyle data with risk factors for diseases, including breast cancer.
EpiGraphDB: A Key Tool
EpiGraphDB allows researchers to connect information from various studies and findings. At its core, this platform helps in examining how certain factors relate to breast cancer risk. Think of EpiGraphDB as a giant library that has all the clues to solve the mystery of breast cancer.
One of its unique features is its ability to provide information on causal relationships using a method called Mendelian Randomization (MR). This method provides insights into whether certain health exposures—such as lifestyle choices—have a direct influence on disease outcomes.
What is Mendelian Randomization?
Mendelian randomization is like a genetic detective work. It uses genetic variations as indicators or "instruments" to examine whether a specific health factor, such as body weight or cholesterol levels, might have an effect on the risk of developing breast cancer.
For example, if a particular genetic variant is linked to higher cholesterol levels and higher breast cancer risk, scientists might be able to argue that cholesterol could play a role in breast cancer development. It’s a clever way to infer causation without relying on a traditional cause-and-effect study that could be influenced by various biases.
Literature-Based Discovery: Mining for Clues
In addition to genetic data, EpiGraphDB also allows researchers to extract information from published literature. This process is known as literature-based discovery (LBD). It involves gathering and connecting information from different studies that might not have been explicitly linked before.
Picture a treasure hunt in a library where you try to find hidden connections among various books and articles. LBD helps scientists make these connections, which can lead to discovering new insights into how factors might be interrelated regarding breast cancer.
The Case Studies: Childhood Body Size and HDL-Cholesterol
To illustrate how these methods work, researchers conducted case studies on two specific traits: childhood body size and HDL-cholesterol (the "good" cholesterol). Both traits have shown associations with breast cancer risk, but the exact mechanisms remain a bit of a puzzle.
Childhood Body Size
Research indicates that childhood body size may impact breast cancer risk later in life. If someone had a higher body size as a child, they might have a decreased risk of developing breast cancer when they grow up. However, the reasons for this association are still unclear.
Using the triangulation approach, researchers identified potential mediators—traits that might help explain the relationship between childhood body size and breast cancer risk. They found connections to traits such as physical activity, sleep duration, and specific proteins.
For instance, it turns out that a larger childhood body size might lead to more exercise in adulthood, which could lower breast cancer risk. It's like a chain reaction where one factor influences another, leading to an overall effect.
HDL-Cholesterol
In a different investigation, researchers looked at HDL-cholesterol's effect on breast cancer risk. Unlike childhood body size, HDL-cholesterol seems to have a risk-increasing effect. So, higher levels of this "good" cholesterol could actually be linked to a greater likelihood of developing breast cancer.
Just like in the previous case, researchers sought to identify possible intermediates that could explain this risk. They discovered links to specific proteins and other traits while also connecting to literature that offered insights. However, some traits that seemed to play a role were associated with opposing effects, which suggested more complex interactions.
Building a Comprehensive Picture
By combining insights from both case studies, researchers aim to build a complete understanding of how specific traits interact with breast cancer risk. The goal is not just to identify risk factors but also to understand the mechanisms behind these associations.
For instance, if they uncover why childhood body size might protect against breast cancer or how HDL-cholesterol can increase risk, they can better inform prevention strategies. It’s like finding the missing pieces of a puzzle—once they fit together, a clearer picture emerges.
Limitations and Challenges
While this approach is exciting and promising, it's not without its challenges. For one, researchers must be cautious about the quality of the data they are using. Integrating various datasets can sometimes lead to noise and confusion.
Additionally, although literature-based discovery is helpful, it relies on published studies, which might be biased or incomplete. So, while researchers might uncover interesting connections, these must be validated with more rigorous methods.
The Future of Research
The use of platforms like EpiGraphDB and techniques like triangulation and literature mining presents a bright future for breast cancer research. Researchers can quickly generate new hypotheses and vet them using established methods.
With these advancements, scientists hope to uncover even more about the complex web of factors that contribute to breast cancer risk. By piecing together the clues, they aspire to ultimately reduce the burden of this disease and improve the lives of those affected.
Conclusion
Breast cancer is a multifaceted disease with many contributing factors. By employing a range of data integration techniques, researchers can identify and analyze these risk factors more effectively. Tools like EpiGraphDB enable the combination of genetic and literature data, allowing for a richer understanding of how lifestyle choices and genetic traits interact.
Through imaginative detective work—much like solving a mystery—scientists shine a light on the connections between risk factors, potential mediators, and breast cancer outcomes. The journey to grasp the complexities of breast cancer continues, but with every piece of evidence gathered, the path to prevention and treatment becomes a bit clearer. And who knows, maybe one day we’ll crack the case wide open!
Original Source
Title: Integrating Mendelian randomization and literature-mined evidence for breast cancer risk factors
Abstract: O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=170 HEIGHT=200 SRC="FIGDIR/small/22277795v2_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (47K): [email protected]@9ae77eorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1d42c97org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@bb707e_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG O_FLOATNOGraphical AbstractC_FLOATNO C_FIG ObjectiveAn increasing challenge in population health research is efficiently utilising the wealth of data available from multiple sources to investigate disease mechanisms and identify potential intervention targets. The use of biomedical data integration platforms can facilitate evidence triangulation from these different sources, improving confidence in causal relationships of interest. In this work, we aimed to integrate Mendelian randomization (MR) and literature-mined evidence from the EpiGraphDB biomedical knowledge graph to build a comprehensive overview of risk factors for developing breast cancer. MethodsWe utilised MR-EvE ("Everything-vs-Everything") data to identify candidate risk factors for breast cancer and generate hypotheses for potential mediators of their effect. We also integrated this data with literature-mined relationships, which were extracted by overlapping literature spaces of risk factors and breast cancer. The literature-based discovery (LBD) results were followed up by validation with two-step MR to triangulate the findings from two data sources. ResultsWe identified 129 novel and established lifestyle risk factors and molecular traits with evidence of an effect on breast cancer, and made the MR results available in an R/Shiny app (https://mvab.shinyapps.io/MR_heatmaps/). We developed an LBD approach for identifying potential mechanistic intermediates of identified risk factors. We present the results of MR and literature evidence integration for two case studies (childhood body size and HDL-cholesterol), demonstrating their complementary functionalities. ConclusionWe demonstrate that MR-EvE data offers an efficient hypothesis-generating approach for identifying disease risk factors. Moreover, we show that integrating MR evidence with literature-mined data may be used to identify causal intermediates and uncover the mechanisms behind the disease.
Authors: Marina Vabistsevits, Tim Robinson, Ben Elsworth, Yi Liu, Tom R Gaunt
Last Update: 2024-12-18 00:00:00
Language: English
Source URL: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.07.19.22277795
Source PDF: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.07.19.22277795.full.pdf
Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.
Thank you to medrxiv for use of its open access interoperability.
Reference Links
- https://epigraphdb.org
- https://gwas.mrcieu.ac.uk
- https://github.com/mvab/epigraphdb-breast-cancer
- https://github.com/mvab/epigraphdb_mr_literature_queries
- https://bcac.ccge.medschl.cam.ac.uk/
- https://epigraphdb.org/confounder
- https://mvab.shinyapps.io/MR_heatmaps/
- https://mvab.shinyapps.io/literature_overlap_sankey/