Simple Science

Cutting edge science explained simply

# Biology # Pharmacology and Toxicology

Gene Editing: A Hopeful Future for Eye Diseases

Gene editing offers promising treatments for inherited retinal disorders and vision loss.

Spencer C. Wei, Aaron J. Cantor, Jack Walleshauser, Rina Mepani, Kory Melton, Ashil Bans, Prachi Khekare, Suhani Gupta, Jonathan Wang, Craig Soares, Radwan Kiwan, Jieun Lee, Shannon McCawley, Vihasi Jani, Weng In Leong, Pawan K. Shahi, Jean Chan, Pierre Boivin, Peter Otoupal, Bikash R. Pattnaik, David M. Gamm, Krishanu Saha, Benjamin G. Gowen, Mary Haak-Frendscho, Mary J. Janatpour, Adam P. Silverman

― 6 min read


Gene Editing for Eye Gene Editing for Eye Diseases for inherited retinal disorders. Innovative solutions may restore vision
Table of Contents

Gene Editing sounds like something out of a science fiction movie, but it’s really just scientists making very precise changes to DNA. DNA is like a recipe book for our bodies. If there’s a mistake in the recipe, the dish might not come out right. In some cases, these mistakes can lead to serious diseases. One area where gene editing is being seriously looked at is in treating eye diseases.

What Are Cas9 Endonucleases?

At the heart of gene editing is a tool called Cas9. Think of it like a pair of scissors that can cut DNA at specific spots. But instead of using it to cut paper, scientists use it to snip at the DNA in our cells. Cas9 doesn’t work alone; it needs a helper called guide RNA (gRNA) to find the exact spot on the DNA where it should cut. After Cas9 cuts the DNA, the cell tries to repair it, sometimes making mistakes that can help fix problems.

The Need for Better Solutions

Scientists have learned that some diseases are caused by little typos in the DNA called point Mutations, which are like changing one letter in a cookbook. These mutations can make genes not work properly, which can lead to vision problems. The good news is that scientists are coming up with new ways to fix these mutations, which could make a real difference for people with eye diseases.

The Eye: A Special Place for Gene Therapy

The eye has some unique features that make it a good candidate for gene therapy. For one, it's not as good at fighting off foreign invaders as other parts of the body, which makes it a “friendly” place for treatments. Additionally, injecting medicine right into the eye allows for very targeted treatment. However, treating inherited eye diseases can be tricky.

What Are Inherited Retinal Disorders (IRDs)?

Inherited retinal disorders (IRDs) are conditions that affect the retina and are passed down from parents to children. They can be caused by various problems in our genes. Some people might lose their vision because their genes don't work properly, either by not doing their job at all or by doing it too much. Examples of IRDs include Stargardt disease and Usher syndrome.

Types of Mutations and Their Effects

There are two main types of mutations that can cause eye diseases:

  1. Loss-of-function mutations: In these cases, the gene is not working as it should, kind of like a bulb that’s burnt out. This can lead to conditions like Stargardt disease.

  2. Gain-of-function mutations: These mutations cause the gene to do things it shouldn't, like a bulb that flickers too much. An example of this is some forms of Retinitis Pigmentosa.

Current Treatments for IRDs

One way to treat these inherited conditions is through gene replacement therapy. This involves giving the patient a working copy of the gene that isn’t functioning properly. A treatment called Luxterna, for instance, was approved for a specific type of inherited blindness. However, not all eye diseases can be treated this way because some genes are too large to fit into the delivery tools scientists use.

Enter Gene Editing

Gene editing offers a new approach to treat IRDs. By directly fixing the mistakes in the DNA, scientists hope to restore normal function. There are different ways to perform gene editing. For example:

  • NHEJ (Non-Homologous End Joining): This method causes a double-strand break in the DNA. When the DNA is fixed, it might introduce small changes that could disable a poorly functioning gene.

  • Base Editing: This is a more precise technique that can change one DNA letter to another without making a double-strand break. It’s like changing a letter in a recipe instead of tearing a page out of a cookbook.

Testing and Challenges

Scientists first test these methods in animal models, usually mice. However, mice eyes are quite different from human eyes, which can be a problem. To better simulate human conditions, researchers have also turned to larger animals like pigs, which have eyes more similar to those of humans.

Delivery of Gene Editors

There are several ways to deliver gene editors into the eye. One common method is to use viral vectors, like AAV (adeno-associated virus), which is often used to carry gene therapies. However, these methods come with challenges, such as immune responses and potential damage to the retina.

Another approach being studied involves using lipid nanoparticles to deliver mRNA that encodes the gene-editing tools. While exciting, this method has its own set of limitations at this point.

The Research Process

In a recent study, scientists sprayed these gene editors directly into the retina of mice and pigs. They used ribonucleoprotein (RNP) complexes, which are the gene editors and the guide RNA combined.

What Did They Find?

After injecting the RNPs, researchers checked how well the gene editors worked. They found that the editors could efficiently modify the target cells in the retina. However, the team also noted some differences in how well the editors worked in mice vs. pigs, which could affect future studies.

Safety and Side Effects

Any new treatment comes with the concern of safety. In these studies, researchers looked for signs of inflammation or damage to the retina. They noticed some minor issues, but overall, the treatments were tolerated well. This is encouraging, but it means that more studies will be needed to ensure long-term safety.

Moving Forward: The Future of Gene Therapy for Eye Diseases

The goal of this research is to move closer to clinical applications. As scientists learn more about how to safely and effectively edit genes, there’s potential for new treatments for people suffering from inherited retinal disorders.

Lessons Learned

The research revealed several key lessons, such as:

  1. Different gene-editing methods may be better suited for different types of mutations.
  2. Large animal models could give better insights into how these therapies will work in humans.
  3. Understanding how to efficiently deliver the gene editors is crucial for successful treatment.

Conclusion

While gene editing may sound like magic, it's firmly rooted in advancing science. The ability to edit genes to treat diseases offers hope for many individuals battling inherited retinal disorders. With ongoing research, we might one day see effective treatments that can prevent blindness and restore vision.

So, the next time someone mentions gene editing, just remember: it’s not just science; it’s a little bit of magic in the world of medicine!

Original Source

Title: Evaluation of subretinally delivered Cas9 ribonucleoproteins in murine and porcine animal models highlights key considerations for therapeutic translation of genetic medicines

Abstract: Genetic medicines, including CRISPR/Cas technologies, extend tremendous promise for addressing unmet medical need in inherited retinal disorders and other indications; however, there remain challenges for the development of therapeutics. Herein, we evaluate genome editing by engineered Cas9 ribonucleoproteins (eRNP) in vivo via subretinal administration using mouse and pig animal models. Subretinal administration of adenine base editor and double strand break-inducing Cas9 nuclease eRNPs mediate genome editing in both species. Editing occurs in retinal pigmented epithelium (RPE) and photoreceptor cells, with favorable tolerability in both species. Using transgenic reporter strains, we determine that editing primarily occurs close to the site of administration, within the bleb region associated with subretinal injection. Our results show that subretinal administration of eRNPs in mice mediates base editing of up to 12% of the total neural retina, with an average rate of 7% observed at the highest dose tested. In contrast, a substantially lower editing efficiency was observed in minipigs; even with direct quantification of only the treated region, a maximum base editing rate of 1.5%, with an average rate of

Authors: Spencer C. Wei, Aaron J. Cantor, Jack Walleshauser, Rina Mepani, Kory Melton, Ashil Bans, Prachi Khekare, Suhani Gupta, Jonathan Wang, Craig Soares, Radwan Kiwan, Jieun Lee, Shannon McCawley, Vihasi Jani, Weng In Leong, Pawan K. Shahi, Jean Chan, Pierre Boivin, Peter Otoupal, Bikash R. Pattnaik, David M. Gamm, Krishanu Saha, Benjamin G. Gowen, Mary Haak-Frendscho, Mary J. Janatpour, Adam P. Silverman

Last Update: Dec 31, 2024

Language: English

Source URL: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.12.30.630799

Source PDF: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.12.30.630799.full.pdf

Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.

Thank you to biorxiv for use of its open access interoperability.

Similar Articles