Sci Simple

New Science Research Articles Everyday

# Computer Science # Artificial Intelligence # Robotics

Teaching Robots to Follow Human Instructions

Learn how robots can improve by following human commands and adapting to mistakes.

Yuxiao Yang, Shenao Zhang, Zhihan Liu, Huaxiu Yao, Zhaoran Wang

― 7 min read


Smart Robots Learn from Smart Robots Learn from Mistakes errors. human instructions and learning from Robots adapt and improve by following
Table of Contents

In the world of robotics and artificial intelligence (AI), there’s a fascinating challenge called Embodied Instruction Following (EIF). At its heart, this challenge is about teaching robots to understand and carry out tasks based on human instructions. Imagine you want a robot to "put a heated mug down on the table." The robot needs to figure out what that means, navigate its environment, and perform the task, all while being smart enough to avoid running into walls or knocking over other items. Sounds simple, right? Not quite!

The Challenge of Instruction Following

These robot tasks are often complex. Each task can involve multiple steps and require the robot to make decisions based on what it sees and hears. The tricky part is that sometimes, the instructions may not be clear, and the robot may encounter unexpected situations. For example, if it mistakenly picks up a basketball instead of a mug, it might completely fail at the task. This is where things get interesting.

Researchers noticed that traditional methods for training robots often didn’t prepare them for unexpected situations. The robots were trained to follow “ideal” paths based on perfect examples, but when things went wrong, they struggled. If they took a less-than-perfect action and found themselves in an unfamiliar state, the robot might just give up, waving its little robotic hands in defeat.

Enter the Hindsight Planner

So, how do we help these robots become better at following instructions? One exciting solution is to use something called a Hindsight Planner. This new approach not only trains robots to follow instructions but also teaches them to learn from their mistakes. Imagine if every time you stumbled while trying to walk, you could learn and adapt your steps! That’s what this planner aims to do.

How Does the Hindsight Planner Work?

The Hindsight Planner takes a fresh look at the instruction-following problem using a framework based on something called a Partially Observable Markov Decision Process (POMDP). In plain terms, this means that the robot makes decisions based on what it can see and guess about what it can’t see. It’s like trying to find your way through a dark room—you have a little light, but you can’t see everything.

In this process, the robot receives a description of the task (like our mug example) and then looks around using its camera. From this, it tries to decide on a “sub-goal.” Instead of immediately completing the task, it breaks it down into smaller steps. For instance, the first step might be to “find the mug,” then figure out how to lift it before finally placing it down.

The Three Big Challenges

But creating a robust planner isn’t easy. There are three major challenges that researchers identified:

  1. Sparse Rewards: Robots often don’t receive feedback until the task is complete. So, how do they know if they are doing it right while they are still working? It’s like being told you did great after finishing an exam but not knowing how you did on each question while taking it.

  2. Limited Visibility: The robot can only see what’s directly in front of it and can’t see everything that might affect its actions. This is similar to when you’re trying to find your keys but can only see part of the room.

  3. Few Learning Examples: When using few-shot learning—learning from just a handful of examples—robots can struggle if they don’t have enough information to infer what to do next.

A Clever Solution: The Actor-Critic Framework

To tackle these challenges, the Hindsight Planner uses a clever approach known as the actor-critic framework. In this setup, two actors brainstorm potential actions based on the robot's observations, while a critic evaluates these choices.

While one actor focuses on the ground truth (the best course of action), the other brainstorms from a broader perspective, including less optimal paths it's taken in the past. This way, if the first actor gets stuck on a "perfect" path that doesn’t work out, the second actor can remind it of alternative routes that might lead to success.

Learning from Past Mistakes

One of the standout features of the Hindsight Planner is its ability to learn from suboptimal actions. When the robot takes a less-than-perfect action, instead of treating it as a failure, the Hindsight Planner reflects on what went wrong. Think of it as a coach reviewing game footage to help an athlete improve.

When the robot goes off track, it can adjust based on its past mistakes. If it tried to put the basketball down instead of the mug, it might learn in the next round that “hey, that’s not what I was supposed to do.” This kind of learning is essential for developing a more adaptable robot.

The Role of the Adaptation Module

Another innovation is the adaptation module. This is like giving the robot a little bit of intuition. When the robot looks at its surroundings, the adaptation module helps it predict important details that are not immediately obvious—like where it might find the mug or how to avoid bumping into the table.

This module helps the robot make informed choices, which is especially useful in complicated tasks. By predicting what’s happening in the environment, the robot can better adjust its plans and avoid errors.

Testing the Hindsight Planner

To see how well the Hindsight Planner works, researchers put it to the test using a challenging benchmark called ALFRED. This benchmark is designed to assess how well robots can handle a range of tasks based on natural language instructions and what they see.

In the ALFRED tasks, the robots must learn a sequence of actions by interpreting instructions and navigating a space with various objects. During testing, they demonstrated impressive improvements in success rates compared to earlier methods. In fact, the Hindsight Planner’s performance often rivaled that of traditional methods that used a significantly larger amount of training data.

A Fun Comparison

Imagine you’re playing a video game where you have to complete quests. Some players might memorize the perfect paths to achieve the highest scores, while others might go on quests, encounter unexpected monsters, and learn to adapt their strategies. The Hindsight Planner is like the latter—it takes the bumps in the road and turns them into learning opportunities, becoming a better player over time.

Real-World Applications

The implications of this work go beyond just gaming. With a strong Hindsight Planner, robots could be used in various real-world scenarios. For example, household robots could help with cooking, cleaning, or organizing without getting stuck by unclear instructions.

Imagine sending your robot to "make breakfast." It could pick the right items, use the stove (without burning down your kitchen), and serve you a perfect cup of coffee—all while learning from any mistakes to do an even better job the next time.

The Future of Robots

As the field of robotics and AI continues to grow, the Hindsight Planner could represent a significant step forward in developing more intelligent, adaptable robots. The combination of learning from mistakes, making informed decisions based on what they observe and breaking tasks into manageable sub-goals gives robots the ability to handle complex tasks better than ever.

In summary, this approach proves that with the right tools and methods, robots can learn to follow instructions as humans do—sometimes stumbling, sometimes thriving, but always learning along the way. Today’s robots may not be perfect, but with mechanisms like the Hindsight Planner, they are well on their way to becoming skilled assistants in our daily lives.

Conclusion

In a nutshell, the Hindsight Planner provides a fresh perspective on training robots to follow instructions. By learning from their actions—both good and bad—robots can improve their performance and handle tasks more effectively. As we continue to refine these methods, the dream of having helpful robots in our homes and lives may soon become a reality.

So, the next time you find yourself struggling to complete a task, remember: if a robot can learn from its mistakes to make a better cup of coffee, maybe you can too—just keep an eye on that basketball!

Original Source

Title: Hindsight Planner: A Closed-Loop Few-Shot Planner for Embodied Instruction Following

Abstract: This work focuses on building a task planner for Embodied Instruction Following (EIF) using Large Language Models (LLMs). Previous works typically train a planner to imitate expert trajectories, treating this as a supervised task. While these methods achieve competitive performance, they often lack sufficient robustness. When a suboptimal action is taken, the planner may encounter an out-of-distribution state, which can lead to task failure. In contrast, we frame the task as a Partially Observable Markov Decision Process (POMDP) and aim to develop a robust planner under a few-shot assumption. Thus, we propose a closed-loop planner with an adaptation module and a novel hindsight method, aiming to use as much information as possible to assist the planner. Our experiments on the ALFRED dataset indicate that our planner achieves competitive performance under a few-shot assumption. For the first time, our few-shot agent's performance approaches and even surpasses that of the full-shot supervised agent.

Authors: Yuxiao Yang, Shenao Zhang, Zhihan Liu, Huaxiu Yao, Zhaoran Wang

Last Update: 2024-12-27 00:00:00

Language: English

Source URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.19562

Source PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2412.19562

Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.

Thank you to arxiv for use of its open access interoperability.

More from authors

Similar Articles