The Role of Dormancy in Animal Survival
Exploring how dormancy aids survival and reproduction across various animal species.
― 7 min read
Table of Contents
Every year, many living things go into a state of Dormancy. This means they slow down their body functions and become inactive for a while, sometimes lasting for months or even years. This can happen to animals, plants, and tiny organisms. The reasons for dormancy can vary, but it usually involves having enough energy stored up while needing to use less energy. This helps them survive tough times until conditions improve for them to be active again.
Why Do Animals Go Dormant?
From a Survival point of view, dormancy helps living things get through hard times when food or other resources are low. For example, when the weather is harsh or food is scarce, going dormant allows animals to wait it out until things get better. Research into dormancy has focused on different groups of living things, which has made it hard to come up with a single overall theory to explain why dormancy is beneficial.
Plants, microorganisms, and some types of invertebrates have been studied a lot regarding dormancy. In these cases, dormancy not only helps them save energy but also reduces the chances of competition and being eaten by predators. Dormancy is seen as an effective strategy over time-some theories suggest it is a smart way for species to ensure their survival and Reproduction.
However, research on dormancy in animals has mainly concentrated on how their bodies work in relation to their environment rather than on the bigger picture of evolution. For many animals, the time spent dormant can be linked to their surroundings, such as energy availability, temperature, and moisture levels. These factors can also influence their growing season-the time of year when they can be active and reproduce.
Interestingly, some animals choose to go dormant even when conditions are still suitable for being active. This indicates that there may be advantages beyond just coping with a short growing season. Some studies suggest that going dormant can lower risks like being hunted or competing for food, leading to better survival rates during these inactive periods.
Different Types of Dormancy
There are two main types of animals that go dormant: warm-blooded animals (like some mammals and birds) and cold-blooded animals (like invertebrates, fish, amphibians, and reptiles). Warm-blooded animals can actively control their energy use, while cold-blooded animals depend more on the climate.
Both types of animals lose energy during dormancy, even though their energy use drops significantly. If dormancy was only about physical needs, we would expect animals to remain active as long as they can gather enough energy. But if there are other benefits to going dormant, animals might choose to be inactive for longer for purposes like improving their chances of survival or reproduction.
In many species, the timing of dormancy can vary between males and females. For example, males might Emerge from dormancy earlier than females, which can give them a head start for Mating. This difference can be explained by the different energy costs associated with reproduction for each sex.
Theories About Dormancy Timing
Researchers have proposed different theories to explain why and when animals enter dormancy. One idea is that dormancy timing happens when conditions become unfavorable enough that maintaining energy balance isn't possible. In this case, differences in how much energy males and females expend in reproduction could explain variations in dormancy timing between the sexes.
Another idea is that dormancy can provide survival benefits during tough periods. For example, if males can stay active long enough to accumulate energy before reproduction, they might have better chances of success. In contrast, females might need to time their dormancy to ensure they can care for their young effectively.
There may also be environmental factors that influence these decisions. For example, species living in colder climates or with less food available might have less distinct differences between the sexes regarding dormancy timing, as energy costs become higher.
Studying Dormancy in Different Species
To better understand dormancy and its evolutionary implications, researchers have examined how various species display this behavior. They looked at a wide range of hibernating mammals, taking into consideration factors like habitat, reproduction, and body size.
In one approach, scientists compared characteristics like climate, seasonal reproduction, and body mass among different hibernating species. They wanted to see if males with higher energy costs during mating were more likely to emerge earlier from dormancy. Their predictions suggested that species with significant differences in energy costs between males and females would show more variation in dormancy timing.
They also reviewed existing literature to analyze dormancy patterns in cold-blooded animals. The goal was to gather information about how dormancy timing related to reproductive investment, energy situation, and environmental conditions across a variety of species.
Results of the Study
Upon analyzing the data, researchers found that various factors influence dormancy timing. Among the examined species, it was apparent that males tended to emerge from dormancy earlier than females, which matches expectations based on survival and reproductive theories. Males often showed more significant energy loss during mating, which resulted in them needing to gather energy quickly.
On the other hand, as for females, factors like maternal investment played a role in delaying their emergence from dormancy. If a female invested a lot in caring for her young, she might take longer to become active again. Also, species in environments with high rainfall tended to see males emerge sooner than females.
These patterns indicate that both the physiological needs of the animals and their reproductive strategies impact how and when they go dormant. The research highlights the complex interplay between survival and reproduction, indicating that dormancy is influenced by various factors.
Understanding Dormancy Across Species
While researchers found support for both survival and reproductive theories of dormancy, it was clear that many animals show a mix of strategies. For example, some male species exhibited high competition during mating, which resulted in them needing to emerge and gather energy quickly. In contrast, females in certain species appeared to be less constrained by competition, allowing them to manage their energy reserves more effectively before breeding.
The study results suggest that while physiological constraints (like energy levels) certainly play a role in dormancy timing, there are also important life-history considerations at play. The timing of dormancy appears to reflect a balance between staying active to reproduce and going dormant to survive.
Implications of the Findings
These findings have critical implications for our understanding of dormancy in the animal kingdom. The study suggests that rather than viewing dormancy as a straightforward reaction to environmental stress, it is crucial to consider the broader evolutionary strategies employed by different species. This highlights the importance of understanding both physiological and reproductive factors when looking at dormancy behavior.
The results could also influence conservation efforts by informing how different species might respond to changing environmental conditions. If some species can adapt their dormancy patterns in response to food availability or predation risks, it may help them survive in the face of habitat changes.
Conclusion
Dormancy is a fascinating and complex phenomenon that plays a vital role in the survival strategies of many species. Understanding the factors that drive dormancy timing sheds light on the intricate balance between survival and reproduction. While physiological constraints certainly contribute to dormancy behavior, the influence of reproductive strategies and environmental factors cannot be overlooked.
As research continues in this field, it is essential to expand our understanding across different species and environments. By doing so, we gain insights into the adaptive strategies that species employ to thrive in diverse and often challenging conditions.
Title: Evolutionary trade-offs in dormancy phenology
Abstract: Seasonal animal dormancy, hibernation or diapause, is widely interpreted as a physiological response for surviving energetic challenges during the harshest times of the year (the physiological constraint hypothesis). However, there are other mutually non-exclusive hypotheses to explain the timing of animal dormancy, that is, entry into and emergence from hibernation (i.e. dormancy phenology). Other survival advantages of dormancy that have been proposed are reduced risks of predation and competition (the "life-history" hypothesis), but comparative tests across animal species are not yet available. Under this hypothesis, dormancy phenology is influenced by a trade-off between reproductive advantages of being active and survival benefits of dormancy. Within a species, males and females differ in the amount of time and energy they invest in reproduction. Thus, the trade-off between reproduction and survival may be reflected by within-species sex differences in the phenology of dormancy. To examine this hypothesis, we used two complementary approaches: (i) a set of phylogenetic comparative analyses on mammals (mainly holarctic rodents), and (ii) a comparison between endotherm and ectotherm dormancy, via analyses of endotherms (including mainly holoarctic rodents) and the existing literature on ectotherms. Using the phylogenetic comparative method applied to more than 20 hibernating mammalian species, we found support for both hypotheses as explanations for the phenology of dormancy. In accordance with the life history hypotheses, sex differences in emergence and immergence were favored by the sex difference in reproductive effort. In addition, physiological constraint may influence the trade-off between survival and reproduction such that, low temperature and precipitation as well as smaller body mass influence sex differences in phenology. We also compiled initial evidence that ectotherm dormancy (invertebrates and reptiles) may be 1) less temperature dependent than previously thought and 2) associated with trade-offs consistent with the life history hypothesis. Dormancy in some endotherms and ectotherms show staggered phenology with respect to the growing season (earlier emergence and immergence than expected) which illustrates the selection pressure exerted by the trade-off between reproduction (earlier emergence than expected) and adult survival (earlier immergence than expected). Thus, dormancy during non-life-threatening periods that are unfavorable for reproduction may be more widespread than previously appreciated.
Authors: Sylvain Giroud, C. Theo, F. S. Dobson, C. Habold
Last Update: 2024-01-23 00:00:00
Language: English
Source URL: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.07.20.549898
Source PDF: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.07.20.549898.full.pdf
Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.
Thank you to biorxiv for use of its open access interoperability.