Simple Science

Cutting edge science explained simply

# Biology# Bioinformatics

New Method Revolutionizes Structural Variant Detection in Microbial Genomes

Rhea offers a fresh approach to studying structural variants in microbial communities.

― 7 min read


Rhea: A Game Changer forRhea: A Game Changer forMicrobial Genomesstructural variants in microorganisms.A powerful method for identifying
Table of Contents

Structural Variants (SVs) are changes in the DNA of an organism. These changes are usually 10 base pairs or longer and can affect how bacteria grow and adapt. Bacterial genomes change over time, which can influence not just the individual bacteria but also the entire microbial community they are part of and even the organisms that host them.

When scientists study individual bacterial genomes, they focus on finding these long changes in DNA compared to a standard reference genome. These changes can be classified in different ways: as Insertions (pieces added), Deletions (pieces removed), inversions (pieces flipped), duplications (pieces repeated), or translocations (pieces moved around). However, when studying many bacteria together, or metagenomics, things get more complicated. This is because there might not always be a clear reference genome, and many similar strains can exist at the same time.

Methods for Detecting Structural Variants

There are various methods for detecting structural variants, which can be grouped into three main types: mapping-driven, assembly-driven, and pattern-driven.

Mapping-Driven Approaches

In mapping-driven methods, DNA sequences (called reads) are aligned directly to a reference genome. The way these reads line up reveals unexpected patterns, which can indicate the presence of structural variants.

Assembly-Driven Approaches

Assembly-driven methods involve putting together these reads into longer sequences, called contigs. Once assembled, these contigs are compared to a reference to find any long-scale differences.

Pattern-Driven Approaches

In pattern-driven methods, researchers look for specific patterns defined in advance. They search for these patterns within the sequencing reads.

One notable mapping-driven method was developed to study structural variants in the human gut microbiome. A special database of known microbes was created, and a detailed algorithm was employed to analyze the sequencing reads. This algorithm helped in identifying regions of the genome with unexpected coverage, which could indicate either deletions or duplications. While this method has been effective in identifying variants related to certain health conditions, it depends heavily on a well-defined database of reference genomes, which may not exist for all communities.

Challenges in Metagenomic Studies

Detecting structural variants in metagenomic contexts is tricky. Since reference genomes may not be known and many similar strains may exist within a community, identifying these variants becomes difficult. As a result, methods for detection can be limited and might miss important changes in the genomes of these strains.

New Approaches to Structural Variant Detection

To tackle these challenges, new approaches have been developed to enhance the detection of structural variants. One such method, called MetaSVs, combines both long and short sequence reads. It assembles these reads to create and classify metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs). This method strives to detect more than just simple deletions and duplications, aiming to uncover a wider array of structural variants.

Another method called MetaCHIP focuses on recent events of Horizontal Gene Transfer (HGT), where genetic material is shared among different organisms. It looks specifically for gene sequences that are more similar to other organisms than to itself, indicating possible recent gene transfers. However, it is limited to identifying genes that closely match those found in other strains.

To completely bypass the need for reference genomes, two pattern-driven methods have been created. The first, PhaseFinder, aims to detect inversions in bacterial genomes. The second, DIVE, identifies genetic sequences surrounding areas of diversity, such as mobile genetic elements. While promising, both of these approaches have their limitations, focusing only on specific patterns.

A Novel Approach: Rhea

Rhea is a new method developed to identify structural variants in microbial communities without the need for reference genomes or MAG creation. Instead, Rhea uses a combined approach to analyze the entire set of metagenomic sequences. It creates a coassembly graph from all the reads and studies how the coverage of these sequences changes over time.

How Rhea Works

To use Rhea, researchers first collect metagenomic data from samples over time. They create a coassembly graph that combines all reads from the samples, and each sample is then aligned back to this collective graph. The change in coverage between samples is analyzed to identify structural variants.

For example, if one part of the graph shows a significant increase or decrease in coverage, it may indicate an insertion or deletion of genetic material. In this way, Rhea is able to detect not only simple structural variants but also complex variations.

Types of Structural Variants Detected by Rhea

Rhea can identify several types of structural variants:

  • Insertions: New genetic material added to the existing genome.
  • Deletions: Genetic material that has been removed.
  • Tandem Duplications: A sequence of DNA that has been repeated in a row.
  • Complex Indels: A mix of insertions and deletions occurring at the same location.

Rhea detects these variants based on the changes in abundance of the sequences, allowing scientists to glean insights into the evolutionary advantages they may confer.

Applications in Real-World Studies

Rhea has been applied in several real-world studies to analyze microbial communities under different conditions.

Cheese Rind Ripening Study

In one study, Rhea was used to analyze the microbial communities present in cheese rinds over time. By examining samples taken at different stages of ripening, researchers could observe how microbial populations changed and adapted as the cheese aged. The method revealed structural variants that correlated with the evolutionary patterns of the bacteria.

Hot Spring Microbial Mats

Another application of Rhea was in studying microbial mats from hot springs. The findings showed an incredible number of structural variants, with the amount of complexity increasing with changes in temperature. These results suggest that microbial communities in such extreme environments are highly dynamic and may undergo rapid evolution.

Simulated Horizontal Gene Transfer

Rhea was also tested on simulated data involving horizontal gene transfer, where genetic material is shared between different strains of bacteria. Results from this simulation demonstrated Rhea's effectiveness in identifying gene transfers, showcasing its potential utility in understanding the genetic makeup of microbial communities.

Advantages of Using Rhea

Rhea offers several benefits over traditional methods:

  1. No Need for Reference Genomes: Rhea can operate without requiring a predefined reference genome, making it adaptable to a variety of microbial communities.
  2. Inclusion of All Sequenced Reads: Rhea analyzes all reads, allowing for a comprehensive overview of genetic variations, especially useful in study environments with unknown or uncharacterized microbes.
  3. Detection of Low Abundance Variants: Rhea can detect structural variants even in low-abundance strains, which may be missed by other methods.

Future Directions

While Rhea has unique capabilities, there is also room for improvement. Future research could focus on expanding the types of structural variants Rhea can detect, such as inversions and translocations. Additionally, methods to enhance sensitivity for detecting variants could be explored.

Rhea's methodology could also be applied in various contexts beyond microbiome studies, including comparative studies among different communities.

Conclusion

Rhea represents a significant advancement in the study of microbial genetics. By offering a new way to detect structural variants in metagenomic data, it opens up new avenues for research. This method not only enhances our understanding of microbial diversity and evolution but also provides insights that could lead to practical applications in health, agriculture, and environmental science.

As our knowledge of microbial communities continues to grow, tools like Rhea will be essential in unraveling the complexities of these ecosystems and understanding how they interact with one another and their environments.

Original Source

Title: Reference-free Structural Variant Detection inMicrobiomes via Long-read Coassembly Graphs

Abstract: Bacterial genome dynamics are vital for understanding the mechanisms underlying microbial adaptation, growth, and their broader impact on host phenotype. Structural variants (SVs), genomic alterations of 10 base pairs or more, play a pivotal role in driving evolutionary processes and maintaining genomic heterogeneity within bacterial populations. While SV detection in isolate genomes is relatively straightforward, metagenomes present broader challenges due to absence of clear reference genomes and presence of mixed strains. In response, our proposed method rhea, forgoes reference genomes and metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) by encompassing a single metagenome coassembly graph constructed from all samples in a series. The log fold change in graph coverage between subsequent samples is then calculated to call SVs that are thriving or declining throughout the series. We show rhea to outperform existing methods for SV and horizontal gene transfer (HGT) detection in two simulated mock metagenomes, which is particularly noticeable as the simulated reads diverge from reference genomes and an increase in strain diversity is incorporated. We additionally demonstrate use cases for rhea on series metagenomic data of environmental and fermented food microbiomes to detect specific sequence alterations between subsequent time and temperature samples, suggesting host advantage. Our innovative approach leverages raw read patterns rather than references or MAGs to include all sequencing reads in analysis, and thus provide versatility in studying SVs across diverse and poorly characterized microbial communities for more comprehensive insights into microbial genome dynamics.

Authors: Kristen D. Curry, F. B. Yu, S. E. Vance, S. Segarra, D. Bhaya, R. Chikhi, E. P. C. Rocha, T. J. Treangen

Last Update: 2024-01-30 00:00:00

Language: English

Source URL: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.01.25.577285

Source PDF: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.01.25.577285.full.pdf

Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.

Thank you to biorxiv for use of its open access interoperability.

More from authors

Similar Articles