Protecting AI Models with Dummy Neurons
New strategies for safeguarding deep neural networks against unauthorized use.
― 5 min read
Table of Contents
In recent years, artificial intelligence (AI) has become a key player in various industries. Companies are increasingly using deep neural networks (DNNs) to build complex models for tasks like image recognition and language processing. However, as these models gain importance, the need for protecting their ownership also rises. One way to protect these models is through Watermarking, which involves embedding a unique identifier within the model itself. This allows the original maker to prove ownership if their model is used without permission.
Understanding Watermarking in DNNs
Watermarking refers to the practice of embedding a message within a model. This message acts like a watermark and can help track any unauthorized use of the model. Essentially, if someone tries to use the model inappropriately, the original creator can extract the watermark and prove that they are the rightful owner.
There are two main types of DNN watermarking: Black-box and White-box. Black-box watermarking embeds the message in the model's predictions, meaning that an outsider can only see the output of the model without accessing its internals. In contrast, white-box watermarking embeds the message directly in the model's structure, making it easier for the owner to prove their claim.
The Need for Stronger Protection
Despite the advantages of watermarking, current methods are still vulnerable. As the technology evolves, so do the techniques used by attackers to remove these watermarks. Attackers often try to modify the model in such a way that the watermark is no longer detectable. For example, they might change some of the model’s internal parameters, rendering the watermark extraction process ineffective.
This poses a significant challenge for companies that rely on these models. If attackers can easily strip away the watermark, it undermines the entire protection mechanism. Thus, finding a more resilient way to protect these models becomes crucial.
Introducing Neural Structural Obfuscation
The latest research has introduced an innovative approach called neural structural obfuscation. This method involves adding what are known as "dummy neurons" to the model. These dummy neurons do not affect the model’s performance but can interfere with the watermark extraction process.
Dummy neurons can be thought of as fake components that blend into the existing model structure. When added to a model that has a watermark, they can modify the way the model behaves without altering its overall functionality. This makes it difficult for watermark verification processes to extract the original embedded message.
How Dummy Neurons Work
Dummy neurons are specifically designed to maintain the output of the model while changing internal parameters. By adjusting the weights of these dummy neurons, attackers can disrupt the watermark extraction process. The key idea is that these added neurons will not change the model's predictions, thereby keeping the model useful while hindering the watermark detection.
For instance, if an attacker inserts multiple dummy neurons into the model's layers, the output remains unchanged. However, the internal structure becomes more complex. This added complexity can confuse watermark extraction algorithms, making it harder to recover the original watermark.
Steps in the Attack Process
The process of using dummy neurons as a form of structural obfuscation can be broken down into several steps:
Generating Dummy Neurons: The first step involves creating the dummy neurons. This can be done using specific techniques that ensure these neurons do not interfere with the model's normal operations.
Injecting Dummy Neurons: Once generated, the dummy neurons are added to the model. This is typically done from the last layer of the model to the first to ensure a seamless integration.
Camouflaging the Neurons: After the dummy neurons are inserted, further techniques can be applied to disguise them among the original neurons. This can involve altering the scale and location of the weights associated with these dummy neurons.
Evaluating the Attack
To understand how effective this approach is, experiments have been conducted on existing watermarking schemes. The goal is to see how well these schemes resist the intrusion of dummy neurons. Results show that adding a small number of dummy neurons can significantly disrupt the watermark extraction processes, pushing the success rate of verification down considerably.
In some cases, the watermark could not be recovered at all, indicating a complete failure of the watermarking technique after the obfuscation. This highlights a serious flaw in the reliability of current watermarking methods.
Addressing the Concerns
While the introduction of dummy neurons is a promising approach, it raises questions about how to defend against such techniques. Defenders need to find ways to identify and remove dummy neurons without affecting the model's functionality. This presents a new challenge in the arms race between attackers and defenders in AI security.
Implications for the Future
As AI continues to grow, the need for effective model protection will only increase. Understanding the vulnerabilities of current watermarking techniques and exploring methods like neural structural obfuscation are crucial steps in developing more robust systems. Moving forward, both researchers and practitioners must be aware of these challenges and strive for improved security measures.
Conclusion
The use of dummy neurons for neural structural obfuscation represents a significant evolution in protecting AI models. As attackers become more sophisticated, so too must the methods used to secure these crucial assets. By embedding dummy neurons, companies can create a more formidable defense against unauthorized use and ensure that their creations remain their own. The ongoing battle between watermarking techniques and removal strategies will only intensify, making it essential for continued research and innovation in this field.
In summary, the integration of innovative techniques like dummy neurons in the realm of DNN watermarking signals the importance of staying ahead in the dynamic landscape of AI security.
Title: Rethinking White-Box Watermarks on Deep Learning Models under Neural Structural Obfuscation
Abstract: Copyright protection for deep neural networks (DNNs) is an urgent need for AI corporations. To trace illegally distributed model copies, DNN watermarking is an emerging technique for embedding and verifying secret identity messages in the prediction behaviors or the model internals. Sacrificing less functionality and involving more knowledge about the target DNN, the latter branch called \textit{white-box DNN watermarking} is believed to be accurate, credible and secure against most known watermark removal attacks, with emerging research efforts in both the academy and the industry. In this paper, we present the first systematic study on how the mainstream white-box DNN watermarks are commonly vulnerable to neural structural obfuscation with \textit{dummy neurons}, a group of neurons which can be added to a target model but leave the model behavior invariant. Devising a comprehensive framework to automatically generate and inject dummy neurons with high stealthiness, our novel attack intensively modifies the architecture of the target model to inhibit the success of watermark verification. With extensive evaluation, our work for the first time shows that nine published watermarking schemes require amendments to their verification procedures.
Authors: Yifan Yan, Xudong Pan, Mi Zhang, Min Yang
Last Update: 2023-03-16 00:00:00
Language: English
Source URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.09732
Source PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2303.09732
Licence: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.
Thank you to arxiv for use of its open access interoperability.
Reference Links
- https://dl.acm.org/ccs.cfm
- https://www.michaelshell.org/
- https://www.michaelshell.org/tex/ieeetran/
- https://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/macros/latex/contrib/IEEEtran/
- https://www.ieee.org/
- https://www.latex-project.org/
- https://www.michaelshell.org/tex/testflow/
- https://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/macros/latex/contrib/oberdiek/
- https://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/macros/latex/contrib/cite/
- https://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/macros/latex/required/amslatex/math/
- https://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/macros/latex/contrib/algorithms/
- https://algorithms.berlios.de/index.html
- https://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/macros/latex/contrib/algorithmicx/
- https://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/macros/latex/required/tools/
- https://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/macros/latex/contrib/mdwtools/
- https://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/macros/latex/contrib/eqparbox/
- https://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/obsolete/macros/latex/contrib/subfigure/
- https://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/macros/latex/contrib/subfig/
- https://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/macros/latex/contrib/caption/
- https://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/macros/latex/base/
- https://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/macros/latex/contrib/sttools/
- https://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/macros/latex/contrib/misc/
- https://www.michaelshell.org/contact.html
- https://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/biblio/bibtex/contrib/doc/
- https://www.michaelshell.org/tex/ieeetran/bibtex/