Understanding Opioid Overdose Patient Profiles in Emergency Departments
Study identifies distinct patient groups experiencing opioid-related issues in emergency care.
― 5 min read
Table of Contents
Opioid overdose deaths have increased significantly, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reported that over 100,000 drug-related deaths occurred in a single year, a rise of 28.7% compared to the previous year, with a majority of these deaths linked to Opioids. Emergency Departments (EDs), which serve millions of patients annually, play a crucial role in providing care to those experiencing opioid Overdoses.
EDs are often the first point of care for patients after an overdose. A substantial percentage of patients who are discharged after an opioid overdose will sadly die within a year. To help reduce these mortality rates, it is essential to implement effective treatment strategies. However, there remain significant gaps in knowledge about the different types of opioid-related presentations in EDs and their long-term outcomes.
Many studies have previously focused on broad categories such as opioid use disorder (OUD) or overdose but often rely on limited data from electronic health records (EHRs). These methods may overlook the complicated realities of patients who have multiple issues related to opioid use. Clinical Notes often contain rich, detailed information that can provide better insights into the individual experiences of these patients.
Recent advancements in natural language processing (NLP) techniques allow for a more in-depth analysis of clinical notes. By using these techniques, researchers can extract valuable information from unstructured data in patient records, helping to form better understandings of patients with opioid-related conditions.
Objectives of the Study
The main goal of this study was to find specific profiles of patients in the ED who were dealing with opioid issues. Researchers aimed to analyze clinical notes and structured data, using NLP to pull out key concepts and themes from patient records. By identifying different Patient Profiles, the study hoped to show how these profiles are linked to various healthcare outcomes.
Study Design and Locations
This research reviewed ED visits from 2013 to 2020 across ten different locations in a regional healthcare network in the northeastern United States. The sites included a mix of urban and suburban areas, covering a wide geographic region. The study focused on adult patients who had at least one opioid-related diagnosis.
Data Collection and Analysis
Researchers gathered demographic and clinical data from the EHR system. They specifically identified notes from patients with opioid-related diagnoses and compared them to notes from other patients to ensure a more representative sample. Important medical information, along with notes from healthcare providers, was then extracted for analysis.
To focus on the clinical details, a machine learning tool called the Medical Concept Annotation Toolkit (MedCAT) was used to pull out relevant medical concepts from the notes. This tool can handle typos and confusing terms better than many previous methods. After training the model with a large set of clinical notes, researchers mapped various terms to standardized medical codes, organizing the data into understandable categories.
Next, researchers used a technique called Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) to extract topics from the notes. This approach allowed them to group words into meaningful topics that reflect different aspects of patient presentations in the ED. Once the topics were defined, they created a numerical representation for each patient visit based on these topics.
Identifying Patient Profiles
Using the topic representations, researchers applied K-means clustering to identify distinct groups of patients. This method allowed them to evaluate how well the clusters represented different patient types based on their characteristics and outcomes.
Through this process, they identified nine unique clusters of patients, each with distinct profiles. For example, one cluster included younger male patients with severe emergency conditions, while another cluster comprised older females with high rates of health issues. These clusters demonstrated various patterns in healthcare utilization and treatment outcomes.
Outcomes Analysis
After forming the patient profiles, researchers analyzed how these groups fared in terms of survival rates, hospital return visits, and prescription patterns. For instance, some clusters had high survival rates and low rates of returning to the ED, while others exhibited the opposite trend. These findings highlighted the diverse challenges faced by different patient groups.
Identifying these clusters is crucial for implementing more targeted interventions. For example, younger males experiencing acute episodes may benefit from specific community support programs, while older patients dealing with chronic conditions may require different resources.
Limitations of the Study
This research had several limitations. First, while the identified profiles captured a broad range of patients, not every person could be neatly categorized into a single group. This can make it challenging to assign patients to their respective profiles in practice.
Additionally, the methods used to uncover topics in the clinical notes could introduce bias. Although the researchers aimed for a comprehensive analysis, the interpretation of topics sometimes depends on subjective choices made during the study.
The machine learning tools used also have limitations. There can be gaps in how well they extract relevant information, which might cause valuable details to be missed. Furthermore, the assumptions made in the topic modeling process may not fully reflect the complexity of the clinical situations.
Lastly, because this study was conducted within a single healthcare network, the results may not universally apply to all populations or systems.
Conclusion
The opioid epidemic represents a significant public health challenge, affecting many people in various ways. By identifying distinct groups of patients in the ED, this study aims to provide a foundation for tailored treatment strategies that can lead to better health outcomes. Recognizing the differences among patients can help healthcare providers allocate resources more effectively and design interventions that are specifically suited to each group's needs.
Overall, the findings from this study underscore the importance of understanding the complexity of opioid-related issues and encourage the development of diverse, evidence-based interventions to address the unique circumstances of different patient populations.
Title: Computational Phenotypes for Patients with Opioid-Related Disorders Presenting to the Emergency Department
Abstract: ObjectiveWe aimed to discover computationally-derived phenotypes of opioid-related patient presentations to the emergency department (ED) via clinical notes and structured electronic health record (EHR) data. MethodsThis was a retrospective study of ED visits from 2013-2020 across ten sites within a regional healthcare network. We derived phenotypes from visits for patients 18 years of age with at least one prior or current documentation of an opioid-related diagnosis. Natural language processing was used to extract clinical entities from notes, which were combined with structured data within the EHR to create a set of features. We performed Latent Dirichlet allocation to identify topics within these features. Groups of patient presentations with similar attributes were identified by cluster analysis. ResultsIn total 82,577 ED visits met inclusion criteria. The 30 topics discovered ranged from those related to substance use disorder, chronic conditions, mental health, and medical management. Clustering on these topics identified nine unique cohorts with one-year survivals ranging from 84.2-96.8%, rates of one-year ED returns from 9-34%, rates of one-year opioid event 10-17%, rates of medications for opioid use disorder from 17-43%, and a median Carlson comorbidity index of 2-8. Two cohorts of phenotypes were identified related to chronic substance use disorder, or acute overdose. ConclusionsOur results indicate distinct phenotypic clusters with varying patient-oriented outcomes which provide future targets better allocation of resources and therapeutics. This highlights the heterogeneity of the overall population, and the need to develop targeted interventions for each population.
Authors: Richard Andrew Taylor, A. Gilson, W. L. Schulz, K. Lopez, P. Young, S. Pandya, A. Coppi, D. Chartash, D. Fiellin, G. D'Onofrio
Last Update: 2023-03-29 00:00:00
Language: English
Source URL: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.03.24.23287638
Source PDF: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.03.24.23287638.full.pdf
Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.
Thank you to medrxiv for use of its open access interoperability.