Simple Science

Cutting edge science explained simply

# Biology# Neuroscience

How the Brain Learns from Reward Feedback

This study examines brain activity during reward-based learning tasks.

― 7 min read


Brain Activity in RewardBrain Activity in RewardLearningduring learning tasks.Study reveals how the brain adapts
Table of Contents

In our daily activities, we often adjust our actions to meet the demands of different situations. The ability to do this relies on how well our brain learns from our actions and the feedback we receive. When we perform tasks, the brain must process information about whether our actions lead to success or failure. This feedback helps us change our behaviors accordingly. However, this can be difficult because many tasks provide only one measure of success, so the brain has to learn to adjust based on that information.

Many areas of our brain work together to help us evaluate whether our actions match our expectations. This includes regions that are responsible for processing sensory information and those that control our movements. A specific set of brain areas, called the medial prefrontal cortex and striatum, plays a significant role in checking if our actions align with what we anticipated. When there is a mismatch between what we expected and what actually happened, it creates a "prediction error." This information serves as a signal to modify our future behavior. However, how this information is shared across various parts of the brain is still not fully clear.

The Role of Brain Systems in Behavior

Researchers have identified different neural systems linked to various aspects of behavior. For instance, the sensory cortex helps us understand our environment, while the motor cortex is responsible for executing movements. Higher-level regions in the brain, such as those involved in attention and decision-making, also play critical roles in guiding our actions.

During Learning, how these brain systems work together is unclear. Recent studies suggest that a network called the Default Mode Network (DMN) may help coordinate these activities. Initially thought to be less active during challenging tasks, the DMN is now being recognized for its role in decision-making and memory tasks. This network may oversee the activities across different brain areas, helping us switch between different modes of behavior, like exploring new options versus exploiting known ones.

The Importance of the Default Mode Network

The DMN has traditionally been associated with introspective thinking, such as recalling memories. However, it has been shown to activate during tasks that require decision-making and working memory. Researchers believe that the DMN's unique position in the brain allows it to connect various brain functions, which is crucial for coordinating behavior.

Some studies indicate that different DMN areas help manage different types of behaviors over time. For example, some DMN regions appear to assist in switching between gathering information and using that information during tasks that involve Rewards. This might explain why the DMN is vital for performance, especially when we need to rely on knowledge gained from previous experiences rather than immediate sensory feedback.

Task and Methodology

In our study, we wanted to examine how brain activity changes during learning that involves rewards. We designed a motor task where participants had to learn to trace a specific movement path without visual feedback of their finger's position. Participants received score feedback based on how accurately they traced a hidden path, which allowed us to study learning processes purely through reward-based feedback.

Each participant first performed a baseline task without feedback. Following that, they engaged in a learning task, where they traced a curved path and received scores based on their performance. This setup offered a unique chance to understand how learning-related changes in brain activity unfold.

Participants used a touchpad to trace a path displayed on a screen. Initially, they did not receive any feedback, allowing us to establish baseline performance. Afterward, during the learning phase, they received scores based on their accuracy in tracing the path, although the actual rewards were based on a hidden shape.

Analyzing Brain Activity

To analyze brain activity during the task, we divided the study into three main periods: baseline, early learning, and late learning. We assessed how brain connections changed during each phase, focusing on the interactions between different brain regions.

We employed advanced techniques to compare the brain's activity patterns across these phases. By measuring how different regions of the brain interacted with one another, we could observe how the communication within and between these regions altered over time.

Results: Early Learning Phase

During the early learning phase, when participants were figuring out how their movements affected their scores, we observed that certain brain regions became more distinct from one another. This was especially true for areas associated with movement and attention. The DMN also showed changes in its activity patterns, indicating that it was playing a significant role in processing the reward feedback.

The increases in connectivity within the DMN and the network associated with Motor Control highlighted how these systems began to work more closely together. Interestingly, some areas in the DMN showed a decrease in their connection with surrounding regions, suggesting a focus on processing the reward information rather than integrating it with other networks.

Results: Late Learning Phase

As participants progressed into the late learning phase, the patterns we observed during early learning began to shift. Areas within both the DMN and motor networks showed reduced separation from each other, indicating increased integration. This suggested that once the participants learned to connect their actions with the rewards, their brains began to coordinate more seamlessly across different networks.

The changes during late learning also suggested that the specific areas responsible for handling sensory feedback shifted. The connections previously established with the attention network became stronger, reflecting almost a return to a more unified brain function that integrated past experiences to guide current behaviors.

Individual Differences in Learning

An interesting aspect of our study was how individual differences in learning abilities affected brain activity. While the overall group showed improvements over the course of the task, some participants learned faster than others. We wanted to understand how these differences related to the changes we observed in brain activity.

To quantify how well each participant learned, we calculated a learning score based on their performance throughout the task. We then examined the relationship between these scores and the changes in Brain Connectivity. Although individual differences were apparent, establishing a clear correlation proved challenging.

However, we noticed a consistent pattern in specific areas of the brain. As participants who learned efficiently showed certain changes in their brain connectivity, those who struggled to learn displayed different patterns. This reinforces the idea that understanding individual variability is crucial for interpreting brain activity in learning contexts.

Conclusion

Overall, our findings shed light on how the brain functions during reward-based learning tasks. The study highlighted significant changes within and between various neural networks as participants progressed. During initial learning, distinct areas became more separated; however, as learning advanced, there was a shift towards greater integration.

These results suggest that the brain's ability to adapt its functionality is essential for learning. Moreover, individual differences in learning behavior are tied to these neural changes, emphasizing the importance of understanding how different people learn using different neural pathways.

Through our study, we contribute to a deeper understanding of the dynamic process of motor learning, revealing how brain activity evolves during this experience. Future research can build on these findings to explore more nuanced aspects of learning and the unique patterns of brain activity that support it.

Original Source

Title: Reconfigurations of cortical manifold structure during reward-based motor learning

Abstract: Adaptive motor behavior depends on the coordinated activity of multiple neural systems distributed across the brain. While the role of sensorimotor cortex in motor learning has been well-established, how higher-order brain systems interact with sensorimotor cortex to guide learning is less well understood. Using functional MRI, we examined human brain activity during a reward-based motor task where subjects learned to shape their hand trajectories through reinforcement feedback. We projected patterns of cortical and striatal functional connectivity onto a low-dimensional manifold space and examined how regions expanded and contracted along the manifold during learning. During early learning, we found that several sensorimotor areas in the Dorsal Attention Network exhibited increased covariance with areas of the salience/ventral attention network and reduced covariance with areas of the default mode network (DMN). During late learning, these effects reversed, with sensorimotor areas now exhibiting increased covariance with DMN areas. However, areas in posteromedial cortex showed the opposite pattern across learning phases, with its connectivity suggesting a role in coordinating activity across different networks over time. Our results establish the neural changes that support reward-based motor learning and identify distinct transitions in the functional coupling of sensorimotor to transmodal cortex when adapting behavior.

Authors: Jason Gallivan, Q. Nick, D. J. Gale, C. Areshenkoff, A. J. De Brouwer, J. Y. Nashed, J. Wammes, T. Zhu, J. R. Flanagan, J. Smallwood

Last Update: 2024-02-08 00:00:00

Language: English

Source URL: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.07.05.547880

Source PDF: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.07.05.547880.full.pdf

Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.

Thank you to biorxiv for use of its open access interoperability.

More from authors

Similar Articles