Simple Science

Cutting edge science explained simply

# Physics# High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena# Solar and Stellar Astrophysics

SN 2021bxu: A Unique Supernova Event

SN 2021bxu exhibits unusual brightness and chemical patterns in a rare Type IIb supernova.

― 5 min read


SN 2021bxu: UnusualSN 2021bxu: UnusualSupernova Insightstheories about supernovae behavior.New findings challenge existing
Table of Contents

Supernovae are powerful explosions that occur at the end of a star's life. They mark the moment when a star collapses under its own gravity. The study of these events helps scientists learn about the life cycle of stars and the processes that govern the universe.

One such event is SN 2021bxu, a remarkable supernova that was discovered in February 2021. This supernova is classified as Type IIb, which refers to a specific type of exploding star that shows characteristics of both Type II and Type Ib supernovae. This article aims to present the features of SN 2021bxu, its light curve, and the implications of its discovery.

Characteristics of SN 2021bxu

SN 2021bxu is notable for its unusual brightness patterns. Initially, it showed a rapid decline in brightness, followed by a brief plateau where the brightness remained steady. This behavior is different from what is typically observed in Type IIb supernovae, which usually have longer plateau phases caused by the recombination of hydrogen or Helium.

Observations showed that during its plateau phase, SN 2021bxu sat at the lower end of the brightness scale for stripped-envelope supernovae. Additionally, its light curve indicated a distinct plateau lasting about 10 days, something not commonly attributed to hydrogen or helium recombination.

The velocities of the lines detected in its spectrum were also slower than what is usually found in similar supernovae, suggesting that SN 2021bxu might be one of the less energetic events in its category.

The Host Galaxy

The supernova was located in a spiral galaxy known as ESO 478-G006. This galaxy has a rich history of star formation, which is significant for understanding the environment in which SN 2021bxu took place.

Just before the supernova was discovered, observations were conducted to measure the characteristics of the host galaxy. These measurements included the age of the stars, the total mass, and the rate at which new stars were forming. This information helps put the supernova in context and offers clues about the star that eventually exploded.

Photometric Observations

In studying SN 2021bxu, researchers gathered multi-band photometric data, which means they captured images at different colors (or wavelengths) of light. This method enables a detailed analysis of how the brightness of the supernova changed over time.

The initial observations showed a rapid decrease in brightness within the first few days. After this decline, the brightness plateaued for about 10 days before starting to fade again. This unique brightness pattern distinguishes SN 2021bxu from other supernovae.

The observations were made using various telescopes, including the Henrietta Swope telescope and the Pan-STARRS, among others. Each telescope contributed different data, which were later combined to create a comprehensive view of the supernova's light curve.

Spectroscopy of SN 2021bxu

Alongside the photometric data, spectroscopy was also conducted. This method involves studying the light emitted by the supernova to identify the elements present in its expanding shell. By analyzing the absorption features, researchers can determine the chemical makeup of the exploded star.

In SN 2021bxu, several elements were detected. These included helium and some hydrogen, which is typical for a Type IIb supernova. However, heavier elements such as calcium, iron, and others were also present. The presence of these elements provides insight into the processes occurring during the explosion.

The velocities of these lines were measured and showed a decrease over time, indicative of the ongoing evolution of the supernova. The data suggest that the explosion had a complex structure, with layers of different elements expanding at varying speeds.

Theoretical Implications

The distinct characteristics of SN 2021bxu challenge existing theories about how supernovae evolve. Typically, Type IIb supernovae exhibit a strong presence of hydrogen, which is often responsible for the Light Curves seen during the recombination phase. However, in SN 2021bxu, the lack of significant hydrogen suggests that this event may not follow the same patterns as other known supernovae.

Instead, researchers propose that the plateau observed may arise from other mechanisms, possibly involving shock interactions with extended material ejected from the progenitor star before the explosion.

Comparing SN 2021bxu with Other Supernovae

When compared to other well-studied supernovae like SN 1993J, SN 2021bxu shows similarities in light curve behavior but also key differences. While both events experienced an initial decline in brightness, SN 2021bxu did not show as strong a second peak in brightness, which is typical for supernovae powered by radioactive decay.

SN 2021bxu is more similar to SN 2021gno, another peculiar supernova that also displayed rapid evolution. However, the amounts of nickel and energy released during the explosion were lower for SN 2021bxu compared to its counterparts.

This uniqueness highlights the diversity present among supernovae and emphasizes the need for continued study in order to fully understand these complex cosmic events.

Conclusion

SN 2021bxu presents a fascinating study in the world of supernovae. Its unusual light curve, slower line velocities, and the chemical composition of its ejecta offer new insights into the life cycle of stars and the various ways they can end their lives. The characteristics of this supernova suggest that there are still many unknowns in the field of astronomy.

Continued observations and analyses of events like SN 2021bxu will no doubt contribute to our understanding of the universe and the processes that govern it. As more data is collected, researchers will have the opportunity to refine models and gain a clearer picture of these spectacular cosmic explosions.

Original Source

Title: Fast and Not-so-Furious: Case Study of the Fast and Faint Type IIb SN 2021bxu

Abstract: We present photometric and spectroscopic observations and analysis of SN 2021bxu (ATLAS21dov), a low-luminosity, fast-evolving Type IIb supernova (SN). SN 2021bxu is unique, showing a large initial decline in brightness followed by a short plateau phase. With $M_r = -15.93 \pm 0.16\, \mathrm{mag}$ during the plateau, it is at the lower end of the luminosity distribution of stripped-envelope supernovae (SE-SNe) and shows a distinct $\sim$10 day plateau not caused by H- or He-recombination. SN 2021bxu shows line velocities which are at least $\sim1500\,\mathrm{km\,s^{-1}}$ slower than typical SE-SNe. It is photometrically and spectroscopically similar to Type IIb SNe during the photospheric phases of evolution, with similarities to Ca-rich IIb SNe. We find that the bolometric light curve is best described by a composite model of shock interaction between the ejecta and an envelope of extended material, combined with a typical SN IIb powered by the radioactive decay of $^{56}$Ni. The best-fit parameters for SN 2021bxu include a $^{56}$Ni mass of $M_{\mathrm{Ni}} = 0.029^{+0.004}_{-0.005}\,\mathrm{M_{\odot}}$, an ejecta mass of $M_{\mathrm{ej}} = 0.61^{+0.06}_{-0.05}\,\mathrm{M_{\odot}}$, and an ejecta kinetic energy of $K_{\mathrm{ej}} = 8.8^{+1.1}_{-1.0} \times 10^{49}\, \mathrm{erg}$. From the fits to the properties of the extended material of Ca-rich IIb SNe we find a trend of decreasing envelope radius with increasing envelope mass. SN 2021bxu has $M_{\mathrm{Ni}}$ on the low end compared to SE-SNe and Ca-rich SNe in the literature, demonstrating that SN 2021bxu-like events are rare explosions in extreme areas of parameter space. The progenitor of SN 2021bxu is likely a low mass He star with an extended envelope.

Authors: Dhvanil D. Desai, Chris Ashall, Benjamin J. Shappee, Nidia Morrell, Lluís Galbany, Christopher R. Burns, James M. DerKacy, Jason T. Hinkle, Eric Hsiao, Sahana Kumar, Jing Lu, Mark M. Phillips, Melissa Shahbandeh, Maximilian D. Stritzinger, Eddie Baron, Melina C. Bersten, Peter J. Brown, Thomas de Jaeger, Nancy Elias-Rosa, Gastón Folatelli, Mark E. Huber, Paolo Mazzali, Tomás E. Müller-Bravo, Anthony L. Piro, Abigail Polin, Nicholas B. Suntzeff, Joseph P. Anderson, Kenneth C. Chambers, Ting-Wan Chen, Thomas de Boer, Michael D. Fulton, Hua Gao, Mariusz Gromadzki, Cosimo Inserra, Eugene A. Magnier, Matt Nicholl, Fabio Ragosta, Richard Wainscoat, David R. Young

Last Update: 2023-07-11 00:00:00

Language: English

Source URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.13581

Source PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2303.13581

Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.

Thank you to arxiv for use of its open access interoperability.

More from authors

Similar Articles