Simple Science

Cutting edge science explained simply

# Computer Science# Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing

AICons: A Fair and Efficient Consensus Algorithm for Blockchain

AICons enhances blockchain efficiency and fairness through decentralized machine learning.

― 6 min read


AICons: Blockchain’s NewAICons: Blockchain’s NewFrontierenergy use.AICons promises fair rewards and low
Table of Contents

Blockchain technology is becoming more popular and is being used in various fields. One of the key parts of blockchain is called the consensus protocol or algorithm, which helps different users (or nodes) agree on what is valid in the blockchain without needing a central authority. However, these Consensus Algorithms often face challenges, especially related to energy use and scalability, making them less useful in many situations.

In traditional blockchains like Bitcoin, the consensus algorithm called Proof-of-Work (PoW) requires a lot of energy to choose winners who create new blocks. This results in low efficiency because only the winning node's effort is recognized, while others are ignored. On the other hand, Proof-of-Stake (PoS) is a different approach that improves Energy Efficiency but raises concerns about fairness and centralization.

As Machine Learning (ML) technology has developed, some proposals have been made to use ML in blockchain consensus algorithms to become more energy-efficient. However, many of these methods still waste energy because they do not recognize the contributions of all nodes fairly.

This article presents a new consensus algorithm called AICons. It aims to improve energy efficiency and fairness in rewarding nodes for their contributions. AICons is designed to work by having every node train its own ML model locally and then combine these individual models into a single, global model.

Blockchain and Consensus Protocols

Blockchain is a digital ledger that securely records transactions across many computers so that the records cannot be altered retroactively. A consensus protocol is critical because it ensures that all nodes in the blockchain agree on the validity of transactions.

Traditional algorithms, like PoW and PoS, have their advantages and disadvantages. In PoW, nodes compete to solve complex mathematical problems, wasting energy in the process. In contrast, PoS chooses winners based on the number of coins they hold, which can lead to centralization where rich users gain more power.

Byzantine Fault Tolerance protocols allow nodes to vote on transactions, but these systems often lack incentives for participation, making them suitable mainly for private blockchains.

More recent attempts have integrated ML into the consensus process, creating methods where nodes compete to train ML models, rewarding only the winning node. This approach has drawbacks because it ignores the effort of all other nodes, leading to wasted resources.

The Need for Energy Efficiency and Fairness

With the growing use of blockchain technology, improving energy efficiency and fairness in rewards is vital. Traditional algorithms often fail to recognize the contributions of each node, which can lead to dissatisfaction and reduced participation. AICons aims to address these issues by ensuring that every node's effort is recognized and rewarded.

AICons uses a decentralized approach where nodes collaborate to create a global ML model, which helps in selecting the winners while also taking into account the contributions of all nodes. This method is expected to enhance both energy efficiency and fairness.

Overview of AICons

AICons is an AI-enabled consensus algorithm that leverages decentralized federated learning to improve the selection of winners in a blockchain network. Here is how it works:

  1. Collaborative Training: Each node in the blockchain network trains its own local ML model using historical and real-time data.
  2. Global Model Creation: All nodes share their trained models with others, allowing for the creation of a global ML model that is more accurate and representative of the entire network.
  3. Fair Reward Distribution: The algorithm incorporates a fair reward mechanism that considers multiple metrics, including model accuracy, energy consumption, and network bandwidth, to evaluate the contributions of each node.

How AICons Works

Collaborative Training of ML Models

Each node collects data from the blockchain and trains its local ML model. This process utilizes information about previous winners and other historical data, allowing nodes to better understand and predict which nodes are likely to win in future rounds.

After training, nodes share their models with one another. This sharing process helps all nodes benefit from the accumulated knowledge and significantly enhances the quality of the global model.

Global Model Creation

Once each node has shared its trained local model, the nodes merge all the models into a single global ML model. This global model is crucial for recommending winners in a way that incorporates the insights and efforts of every participating node.

By using a decentralized method, AICons prevents biases that could arise from any single node leading the training process. The collective effort of all nodes contributes to a more reliable and efficient winner selection.

Fair Reward Distribution

AICons introduces a fair reward distribution mechanism based on the Shapley value, a concept from game theory that measures contributions in cooperative settings. By considering multiple parameters such as accuracy, energy consumption, and network bandwidth, AICons ensures that rewards are allocated fairly according to each node's contribution.

If a node contributes positively by improving model accuracy or saving energy, it will receive higher rewards. This encourages all nodes to work efficiently while contributing to the network.

Experimental Evaluation

To validate AICons’s design, experiments were conducted to assess its performance compared to traditional consensus algorithms. The tests aimed to evaluate scalability, fairness in rewards, and overall profitability for the nodes.

Fairness in Reward Distribution

The experiments showed that AICons provides a more equitable reward system than traditional methods like PoW and PoS. In PoW, only the winning node receives rewards, while in PoS, rewards depend on the stakes held by nodes. In contrast, AICons rewards all nodes based on their efforts and contributions, leading to a more satisfying and fair experience for everyone involved.

Scalability and Performance

AICons also outperformed traditional algorithms in terms of scalability. The algorithm demonstrated the ability to handle more transactions per second as the number of nodes increased, thanks to the efficient use of resources and the rapid processing capabilities of the ML models.

The experiments indicated that as more nodes joined the network, AICons maintained high throughput rates compared to other algorithms, which often struggled or experienced significant drops in performance when scaling up.

Profitability for Nodes

Profitability was another area where AICons showed promise. The tests demonstrated that nodes utilizing AICons could expect higher rewards as long as they contributed positively. This is particularly important because if rewards decrease sharply with an increasing number of nodes, participation in the network could decline.

AICons maintained a favorable balance, ensuring that nodes could earn reasonable profits irrespective of the increasing competition in the network.

Conclusion

AICons represents a significant advancement in consensus algorithms for blockchain systems. By promoting energy efficiency and fairness, it allows every node to contribute meaningfully to the network and be rewarded accordingly.

Through collaborative training of ML models and innovative reward mechanisms, AICons addresses the shortcomings of traditional consensus algorithms. The positive results from experiments demonstrate its potential to support larger, more sustainable blockchain networks while ensuring every participant feels valued and recognized.

Looking forward, there remains an opportunity to enhance AICons further by exploring unsupervised machine learning methods to reduce the manual effort needed for data labeling. This could simplify the training process and pave the way for even more efficient and equitable blockchain networks in the future.

Original Source

Title: AICons: An AI-Enabled Consensus Algorithm Driven by Energy Preservation and Fairness

Abstract: Blockchain has been used in several domains. However, this technology still has major limitations that are largely related to one of its core components, namely the consensus protocol/algorithm. Several solutions have been proposed in literature and some of them are based on the use of Machine Learning (ML) methods. The ML-based consensus algorithms usually waste the work done by the (contributing/participating) nodes, as only winners' ML models are considered/used, resulting in low energy efficiency. To reduce energy waste and improve scalability, this paper proposes an AI-enabled consensus algorithm (named AICons) driven by energy preservation and fairness of rewarding nodes based on their contribution. In particular, the local ML models trained by all nodes are utilised to generate a global ML model for selecting winners, which reduces energy waste. Considering the fairness of the rewards, we innovatively designed a utility function for the Shapley value evaluation equation to evaluate the contribution of each node from three aspects, namely ML model accuracy, energy consumption, and network bandwidth. The three aspects are combined into a single Shapley value to reflect the contribution of each node in a blockchain system. Extensive experiments were carried out to evaluate fairness, scalability, and profitability of the proposed solution. In particular, AICons has an evenly distributed reward-contribution ratio across nodes, handling 38.4 more transactions per second, and allowing nodes to get more profit to support a bigger network than the state-of-the-art schemes.

Authors: Qi Xiong, Nasrin Sohrabi, Hai Dong, Chenhao Xu, Zahir Tari

Last Update: 2023-04-17 00:00:00

Language: English

Source URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.08128

Source PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2304.08128

Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.

Thank you to arxiv for use of its open access interoperability.

More from authors

Similar Articles