Simple Science

Cutting edge science explained simply

# Health Sciences# Neurology

Cortex Thickness and Cognitive Decline in Parkinson's Disease

Research highlights the link between brain structure and cognitive issues in Parkinson's patients.

― 5 min read


Cortex Thickness andCortex Thickness andCognitiondecline in Parkinson's patients.Thinner cortices linked to cognitive
Table of Contents

Parkinson's Disease (PD) is a condition that affects the brain and leads to problems with movement. As the disease progresses, many people with PD also experience issues with thinking and memory, which is often referred to as Cognitive Decline. Understanding how different parts of the brain change over time in PD patients can help us better comprehend why some individuals experience more cognitive problems than others.

Brain Imaging and Parkinson's Disease

Researchers use brain imaging techniques, such as MRI scans, to look at the structure of the brain in people with Parkinson's Disease. These scans can reveal changes in the thickness of the brain's outer layer, known as the CORTEX, which may be linked to cognitive decline. Specific areas of the brain, like the orbitofrontal cortex and cingulate cortex, have been found to be particularly important in understanding cognitive decline in PD patients.

Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS)

An advanced treatment for those with more severe symptoms of PD is called Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS). This technique involves implanting electrodes in certain areas of the brain to help manage symptoms. While DBS can improve movement in many patients, it also carries a risk of worsening cognitive functions in some individuals. This has raised questions about how DBS affects the brain's structure and functionality.

The Study

In a recent study, researchers focused on understanding the relationship between the thickness of specific brain regions and cognitive decline in PD patients who had undergone DBS. They followed a group of 32 patients over time, assessing their cognitive status before and after DBS. The goal was to see if certain brain changes could predict future cognitive decline.

Participants and Methods

The study involved PD patients who had DBS treatment in the past. Cognitive assessments were conducted at two different times: once before the start of the study and again later on. The researchers obtained brain scans before the patients underwent DBS. This allowed them to analyze the thickness of different parts of the brain and correlate these measurements with changes in cognitive function.

Brain Imaging and Cortical Thickness

The researchers used advanced imaging techniques to measure the thickness of the cortex in specific areas of the brain that are known to be affected in PD. They focused on regions like the orbitofrontal cortex, which plays a key role in decision making and emotional regulation, as well as the cingulate cortex, which is involved in processing emotions and cognitive functions.

Statistical Analysis

To make sense of the data, researchers employed statistical techniques to correlate brain structure with cognitive changes. They looked specifically at how the thickness of the cortex related to differences in cognitive scores measured by a standard test called the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) between the two assessment points.

Findings on Cognitive Decline

The study found that patients with thinner cortical areas, particularly in the orbitofrontal, cingulate, and occipito-temporal regions, experienced more substantial declines in their MoCA scores. In contrast, patients whose cortical areas were thicker exhibited little to no cognitive decline over the same period.

Specific Results

Patients with thinner cortices showed a decrease in their MoCA scores of up to 4 points. In comparison, those with thicker cortices did not show significant changes in cognitive scores. This suggests that maintaining thicker cortical regions might protect patients from cognitive decline.

Comparing Cognitive Functioning

Importantly, at the start of the study, there were no differences in cognitive scores between patients with thinner and thicker cortices. This finding indicates that the initial cognitive status did not predict future decline, but instead, the structure of the brain itself played a crucial role in determining cognitive outcomes.

Time to Cognitive Decline

The analysis also aimed to determine whether thinner cortical areas were associated with a faster rate of cognitive decline. The results showed that several brain regions with thinner cortices were linked to a quicker decline in cognitive function over time. This highlights the potential importance of cortical thickness as a measure for predicting cognitive outcomes in PD patients.

Interpretations of Findings

These findings are significant because they offer insights into how structural changes in the brain relate to cognitive decline in patients treated with DBS. They align with existing evidence that certain brain areas, when compromised, can lead to poorer cognitive outcomes. It seems essential to identify which patients might be at higher risk of cognitive decline after DBS treatment, and brain imaging could serve as a valuable tool in this process.

Limitations of the Study

Despite the important findings, there are some limitations to consider. First, the brain scans were taken at various times before the patients began participating in the study, which could introduce variability in the data. Additionally, the absence of a control group made it difficult to compare the results against a similar group of PD patients who did not undergo DBS.

Future Directions

Future research should focus on larger groups of patients and include both brain imaging and cognitive assessments taken at the same time to provide clearer insights. It would also be beneficial to investigate how other brain structures, such as those deeper within the brain, interact with cortical thickness and cognitive function.

Conclusion

In summary, this research suggests that the thickness of specific brain regions is closely related to cognitive decline in patients with Parkinson's Disease who have undergone Deep Brain Stimulation. Thinner cortices appear to be linked to greater cognitive decline, whereas thicker cortices may offer some protection. These findings may lead to better ways to identify patients at risk for cognitive issues following DBS treatment and highlight the importance of maintaining brain structure to help preserve cognitive function in Parkinson's Disease patients.

Original Source

Title: Cortical thickness and cognitive decline in Parkinson patients with deep brain stimulation in the MARK-PD study

Abstract: Advanced Parkinsons disease (PD) and deep brain stimulation (DBS) are associated with cognitive impairment. We aimed to evaluate whether regional cortical thickness is associated with cognitive decline in patients with advanced PD treated with DBS. From the MARK-PD study, 32 patients with DBS implantation were included. Cortical thickness of 148 brain areas and cognitive function were assessed with MRI data using the FreeSurfer pipeline and Montreal Cognitive Assessment at baseline and follow-up (median 17 months), respectively. Adjusted linear and Cox regression models were calculated. Thinner orbitofrontal, cingulate, and occipito-temporal cortices as well as cuneus is related to significant cognitive decline. Moreover, lower thickness of these cortices is also associated with faster cognitive decline. Our study suggests that PD patients treated with DBS and lower cortical thickness in multiple brain regions develop at stronger and faster cognitive decline during the later course of the disease.

Authors: Robert Schulz, M. Uyar, J. A. Graterol Perez, M. Poetter-Nerger, C. Buhmann, C. Gerloff, C.-u. Choe

Last Update: 2023-05-21 00:00:00

Language: English

Source URL: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.05.16.23290035

Source PDF: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.05.16.23290035.full.pdf

Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.

Thank you to medrxiv for use of its open access interoperability.

More from authors

Similar Articles