Simple Science

Cutting edge science explained simply

# Biology# Bioengineering

Advancements in Fluorescent Protein Technology

New fluorescent proteins improve cell observation techniques for researchers.

― 6 min read


Fluorescent ProteinsFluorescent ProteinsEnhancedcell imaging.New variants improve brightness for
Table of Contents

Fluorescent proteins (FPs) are special proteins that glow under certain lighting. They are widely used in biology to help scientists see and study cells and their components more clearly. However, one major challenge scientists face with these proteins is that they can lose their brightness over time, a process known as photobleaching. This issue limits the time researchers can observe living cells.

The Development of StayGold

To tackle the problem of photobleaching, scientists studied a fluorescent protein from a jellyfish known as Cytaeis uchidae. Through various techniques, they developed a new and improved version of this protein called StayGold. StayGold is bright and resistant to fading, which means researchers can observe cells for longer periods without losing the protein's glow.

StayGold is a specific type of protein called an obligate dimer. This means that it naturally pairs up with another molecule to function properly. Initially, researchers used StayGold to mark and visualize parts of the cell, such as the endoplasmic reticulum and mitochondria.

Moving to Monomeric Versions

In their research, scientists realized they needed a version of StayGold that could work alone, without pairing. They named this new version mStayGold. They found a way to change the structure of StayGold while keeping its important features, but it took several rounds of testing and adjustments.

After many attempts, they successfully created mStayGold, which is simpler because it can operate on its own. To differentiate it from other versions, one of the latest monomers was named mStayGold(J), with J signifying Japan.

Comparing Different Versions of StayGold

Other scientists also focused on creating variations of StayGold. One group found that a single change in the StayGold structure could produce a version called mStayGold (E138D) that also worked as a monomer. Another group used a different approach, performing genetic tests to create another version called mBaoJin, which is known for its high brightness.

While these different versions of StayGold all aim to improve fluorescence, they also faced concerns regarding their structure. Some researchers argued that making too many changes to the original StayGold could lead to a loss of brightness or stability.

How These Variants Perform in Tests

To understand how well these variants work, scientists conducted a series of tests. They focused on the brightness and stability of each version when expressed in bacterial cells and mammalian cells. They used specific techniques to measure how well each protein absorbed light and emitted fluorescence.

In one test, they noticed that mStayGold(J) and mBaoJin produced very bright signals in bacterial colonies, while the other versions appeared dimmer. This difference in brightness indicated that not all versions of StayGold work equally well in every situation.

The Importance of Codons

Another important factor in their testing was the choice of codons. Codons are sequences of DNA that dictate how proteins are formed. The scientists ensured that the variants they tested used codons that are preferred by mammalian cells for better expression, which is vital for the proteins to function properly.

In their tests, they made several versions of mStayGold (E138D) using the preferred mammalian codons, which improved its brightness. They also tested these proteins in living mammalian cells to measure their effectiveness in real biological conditions.

Measuring Brightness and Stability

One of the most critical aspects of these fluorescent proteins is how bright they are when used in research. The scientists measured the brightness of mStayGold(J), mStayGold(B), (n1)mStayGold(B), and mBaoJin in living cells. They found that mStayGold(J) had the highest brightness, followed by mBaoJin, while the other two variants were significantly dimmer.

In their experiments, they also examined how stable each version was under light exposure. mStayGold(J), mStayGold(B), and (n1)mStayGold(B) were similarly stable, while mBaoJin was less stable. This information is crucial because if a fluorescent protein dims quickly, it won't be useful for long-term imaging of living cells.

Application in Cell Studies

To further their research, scientists used mStayGold and its variants to explore the structure of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) by attaching the fluorescent proteins to specific markers. By fusing the proteins to the cytoskeleton of cells, they could analyze how these proteins behaved when placed in different parts of the cell.

They performed numerous tests to understand how these proteins functioned inside living cells, focusing on how well they could stay attached to their intended targets and how they performed under various conditions.

The Role of Adaptors

In their findings, scientists also discussed the importance of adding adaptors to the fluorescent proteins. Adaptors can help enhance the performance of the proteins by aiding their attachment and stability. For example, they suggested adding specific adaptors to help with the tagging process of proteins of interest.

Photostability in Living Cells

Photostability refers to how well a fluorescent protein retains its brightness when exposed to continuous light in living cells. By studying photostability, researchers aimed to improve the usability of fluorescent proteins in live-cell imaging.

The results showed that while mStayGold(J) and mStayGold(B) displayed good stability, mBaoJin was more prone to fading. This issue is significant because researchers often need to observe cells for extended periods, making bright and stable proteins essential for their work.

Challenges and Trade-offs

As researchers worked on these fluorescent proteins, they noted that achieving both brightness and stability is challenging. The modifications needed to enhance one property often negatively impacted the other. Finding a balance between these qualities is crucial for developing effective fluorescent proteins.

Future Directions

Looking ahead, scientists see great potential in further improving the variants of StayGold. They recognize that there is still much to learn about how these proteins behave in different environments and what changes can enhance their properties even further.

The goal is to refine the properties of fluorescent proteins for various applications in biology, which could lead to breakthroughs in understanding cellular processes better.

Conclusion

In summary, the development of new fluorescent proteins like StayGold and its variants represents an ongoing effort to improve our ability to study cells and their components. Through a series of experiments, researchers have been able to create brighter and more stable proteins, each with specific advantages and challenges.

By understanding the strengths and weaknesses of different versions, scientists can continue to advance their research and open new doors in the fields of biology and medicine. Whether looking at the basic functions of cells or diving deeper into complex biological systems, these fluorescent proteins will be essential tools for researchers in the years to come.

Original Source

Title: Comparison of monomeric variants of StayGold

Abstract: StayGold is a bright and highly photostable fluorescent protein (FP) that forms an obligate dimer, thereby limiting its application as a soluble marker. On the basis of the structural information of this FP, we disrupted the dimerization to generate a monomeric variant, mStayGold, which inherits both the extremely high photostability and the high practical brightness of StayGold, for molecular fusion and membrane-targeting applications. Meanwhile, two other research groups have independently monomerized StayGold using different strategies. As a result, multiple StayGold monomers are currently available, creating confusion in the research community. In the present study, we investigated the three basic properties--photostability, brightness, and dispersibility--of these monomers by performing detailed side-by-side comparisons. This study highlights the difficulties of StayGold monomerization with emphasis on the tradeoff between photostability and brightness in FP technology.

Authors: Atsushi Miyawaki, S. Shimozono, R. Ando, M. Sugiyama, M. Hirano, Y. Niino

Last Update: 2024-02-29 00:00:00

Language: English

Source URL: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.02.28.582207

Source PDF: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.02.28.582207.full.pdf

Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.

Thank you to biorxiv for use of its open access interoperability.

More from authors

Similar Articles