Analyzing Tau Levels in Alzheimer's Disease
Study reveals how tau levels affect cognitive decline in Alzheimer's.
― 7 min read
Table of Contents
Positron emission tomography (PET) scans can help us see changes in the brain related to TAU, a protein that forms tangles in patients with Alzheimer's disease. About ten years ago, the first PET tracers for tau were developed, which helped researchers learn more about how tau affects aging and Alzheimer's. However, there are still many questions. One major question is how tau spreads throughout the brain. The goal of this paper is to provide a broad understanding of the prevalence and importance of tau levels in people with late-onset sporadic Alzheimer's disease.
We used data from a large study called the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) to see how abnormal tau levels relate to different cognitive states in individuals who are cognitively unimpaired, have Mild Cognitive Impairment, or have Alzheimer’s disease dementia. We looked at how much and where tau is abnormal in these groups, both at one point in time and over a longer period. Finally, we explored how these levels connect to changes in cognitive ability.
Understanding Tau Pathology Progression
Tau accumulation in the brain generally follows a specific pattern defined by the Braak stages. This pattern shows that tau starts in the medial temporal areas of the brain before moving to limbic areas, and then eventually spreads to the entire brain. Many PET studies have confirmed this pattern in living patients. Researchers usually look at tau levels in fixed areas of the brain that are known to show early tau accumulation, called temporal regions.
Recent studies have pointed out that this approach may not be the best since tau progression can vary widely between individuals. It is important to track changes over time, and using specific areas suited to each person could lead to better insights. Evidence suggests that tau levels are a key indicator of cognitive decline, especially when looking at early stages of Alzheimer's disease. If tau patterns vary among individuals, using a single approach to measure tau across different people may miss crucial differences.
Analyzing Tau Levels Across Participants
We looked at 1,370 tau PET Scans from 832 participants in the ADNI study. Our goal was to analyze the spatial extent of tau buildup across 70 brain regions at both a single point in time and over a longer duration. We created a new measure called the spatial extent index to consider individual differences in tau levels across the brain. This index allowed us to see how tau levels linked to performance in different cognitive areas. We compared this measure to traditional approaches that use predefined areas of the brain for tau analysis.
Our expectation was that a more detailed analysis of tau levels in specific regions would provide a clearer picture of cognitive impairment than methods that rely on average uptake from one group of regions across everyone.
Key Findings
Our study indicated that while participants had higher tau levels that matched the Braak stages, there was considerable variation in which specific regions were affected. Furthermore, even though individuals with mild cognitive impairment and dementia had similar rates of tau buildup in local areas, the spread of tau (the number of regions turning from tau-negative to tau-positive) was faster in those with mild cognitive impairment.
When evaluating cognitive deficits related to executive function, the spatial extent index showed slightly better performance compared to the standard approach. However, both methods were equally associated with memory performance.
Methods of Study
We utilized data from ADNI, which has been active since 2003. The main goal of ADNI is to assess whether various tests, including MRI and PET scans, can work together to measure the progression of mild cognitive impairment and early Alzheimer’s disease. The analysis conducted for this study was based on ADNI data available until May 2022.
We included participants who had at least one tau PET scan and one amyloid PET scan, along with a diagnosis within two years of the tau scan.
PET Acquisition and Processing
For this study, we used fully processed PET data from ADNI. The flortaucipir tracer was used for tau PET scans, with images captured after an appropriate delay post-injection. For amyloid PET, other tracers were used, and similar image processing steps were taken.
We extracted standardized uptake values for each region of interest from the cortex and established thresholds for abnormal tau levels using statistical modeling. We created our main measure, the spatial extent index, to sum the number of regions with excessive tau levels in each participant.
Neuropsychological Measures
To assess the impact of tau levels on cognitive performance, we looked at various cognitive functions like memory, executive function, language, and visuospatial skills in relation to the spatial extent index.
Statistical Analyses
We performed statistical analyses using Python and R programming languages. We compared group demographics and tau levels across different groups, focusing on how tau accumulation correlates with cognitive scores.
Cross-Sectional Findings
The analysis revealed that across different diagnostic groups, the entorhinal cortex was the region most often showing tau positivity among amyloid-positive participants. Other frequently affected areas included the inferior temporal and amygdalae regions. Overall, participants generally followed the Braak staging scheme, with a high percentage also positive in earlier Braak stages if they met the criteria for a later stage.
For the mild cognitive impairment group, the spatial extent index showed a stronger association with memory performance compared to traditional approaches, while results for language and executive functions were similar across both methods.
Longitudinal Findings
When examining participants over time, we found that tau levels tended to follow the Braak staging throughout the follow-up period. Progression patterns varied by clinical stage, with mild cognitive impairment participants showing faster accumulation and spread of tau compared to cognitively unimpaired individuals and those with dementia.
Our longitudinal analysis indicated that a number of participants shifted from a negative to positive status on tau scans over time. The fastest progression rates were noted in individuals with mild cognitive impairment.
Heterogeneity in Tau Abnormality
We noted significant individual differences in tau abnormality patterns both at baseline and over time. Participants with Alzheimer's disease dementia exhibited the greatest variability in tau levels compared to those with mild cognitive impairment and cognitively unimpaired individuals.
Our analyses revealed that while there are broad patterns of tau accumulation, individual differences in where and how quickly it occurs are substantial. This variability is critical when assessing cognitive decline and response to treatment.
Cognitive Associations
The study focused on understanding how tau levels impacted cognitive performance across different areas. We found stronger associations between the spatial extent index and performance in executive functioning, particularly in patients with mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease dementia.
Our findings support the idea that tau pathology has distinct impacts on various cognitive domains. The specific regions affected by tau accumulation often align with the cognitive functions impaired in patients.
Strengths and Limitations
The strengths of this study include a large sample size and a comprehensive analysis of both cross-sectional and longitudinal data. The considerable length of cognitive assessments across the follow-up period adds robustness to our findings.
However, there are limitations to consider. The participants in the ADNI study predominantly present with amnestic type Alzheimer’s, which may limit the generalizability of the findings to atypical cases.
Moreover, due to the nature of clinical diagnoses influencing participant selection, individual biological differences may affect results differently. The observed heterogeneity in tau patterns indicates that being diagnosed within the same clinical category does not always equate to having the same biological stage of tau pathology.
Conclusion
This study confirms that tau levels generally accumulate following established patterns in Alzheimer's disease. However, we also highlighted significant variability in how tau spreads within individuals. Mild cognitive impairment appears to be a critical stage where the spread of tau accelerates.
Our results emphasize that using a spatial index for tau levels can enhance the understanding of cognitive decline and its underlying mechanisms. This approach may be particularly important for assessing cognitive functioning in individuals with mild cognitive impairment or Alzheimer’s disease dementia.
By focusing on individual tau patterns and their cognitive implications, this study suggests a new pathway for future research and potential clinical applications.
Title: Tau accumulation and its spatial progression across the Alzheimer's disease spectrum
Abstract: The spread of tau abnormality in sporadic Alzheimers disease is believed typically to follow neuropathologically defined Braak staging. Recent in-vivo positron emission tomography (PET) evidence challenges this belief, however, as spreading patterns for tau appear heterogenous among individuals with varying clinical expression of Alzheimers disease. We therefore sought better understanding of the spatial distribution of tau in the preclinical and clinical phases of sporadic Alzheimers disease and its association with cognitive decline. Longitudinal tau-PET data (1,370 scans) from 832 participants (463 cognitively unimpaired, 277 with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and 92 with Alzheimers disease dementia) were obtained from the Alzheimers Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Among these, we defined thresholds of abnormal tau deposition in 70 brain regions from the Desikan atlas, and for each group of regions characteristic of Braak staging. We summed each scans number of regions with abnormal tau deposition to form a spatial extent index. We then examined patterns of tau pathology cross-sectionally and longitudinally and assessed their heterogeneity. Finally, we compared our spatial extent index of tau uptake with a temporal meta region of interest--a commonly used proxy of tau burden--assessing their association with cognitive scores and clinical progression. More than 80% of amyloid-beta positive participants across diagnostic groups followed typical Braak staging, both cross-sectionally and longitudinally. Within each Braak stage, however, the pattern of abnormality demonstrated significant heterogeneity such that overlap of abnormal regions across participants averaged less than 50%. The annual rate of change in number of abnormal tau-PET regions was similar among individuals without cognitive impairment and those with Alzheimers disease dementia. Spread of disease progressed more rapidly, however, among participants with MCI. The latters change on our spatial extent measure amounted to 2.5 newly abnormal regions per year, as contrasted with 1 region/year among the other groups. Comparing the association of tau pathology and cognitive performance in MCI and Alzheimers disease dementia, our spatial extent index was superior to the temporal meta-ROI for measures of executive function. Thus, while participants broadly followed Braak stages, significant individual regional heterogeneity of tau binding was observed at each clinical stage. Progression of spatial extent of tau pathology appears to be fastest in persons with MCI. Exploring the spatial distribution of tau deposits throughout the entire brain may uncover further pathological variations and their correlation with impairments in cognitive functions beyond memory.
Authors: Alexa Pichet Binette, F. St-Onge, M. Chapleau, J. C. Breitner, S. Villeneuve, Alzheimer's disease neuroimaging initiative
Last Update: 2023-06-05 00:00:00
Language: English
Source URL: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.06.02.23290880
Source PDF: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.06.02.23290880.full.pdf
Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.
Thank you to medrxiv for use of its open access interoperability.