Temporal Predictive Coding: A New Look at Brain Processing
A new model for understanding how the brain processes changing sensory information.
― 7 min read
Table of Contents
- Background on Predictive Coding
- The Need for a Temporal Approach
- Introducing Temporal Predictive Coding (tPC)
- The Structure of tPC
- Learning Mechanism
- Implementation in Neural Circuits
- The Role of Time
- Testing and Results
- Relationship with Existing Models
- Nonlinear Dynamics in tPC
- Implications for Cognitive Science
- Conclusion
- Original Source
In recent years, scientists have focused on how the brain processes information from our senses. One idea that has gained a lot of attention is predictive coding. This concept suggests that our brains are constantly making predictions about what we see, hear, and feel based on past experiences. When the actual sensory input comes in, the brain checks how accurate its predictions were and makes adjustments if necessary.
This paper introduces a new model called Temporal Predictive Coding ([TPC](/en/keywords/temporal-predictive-coding--k9njvz6)). The goal of this model is to explain how our brains manage to process changing sequences of sensory inputs over time. While traditional predictive coding focused mainly on static images or sounds, tPC aims to understand dynamic or moving inputs.
Background on Predictive Coding
Predictive coding is based on the idea that the brain is like a prediction machine. It builds a model of the world based on past experiences and uses that model to predict incoming sensory information. When there's a mismatch between what the brain expected to perceive and what it actually perceives, this difference is called a prediction error. The brain then updates its model to reduce future Prediction Errors.
Research has shown that predictive coding can explain various brain functions, such as how we perceive visual images and process sounds. It suggests that Learning is largely about adjusting neural connections to minimize these prediction errors. This means that even though our brains are constantly receiving new information, they are also continuously updating their internal models of the world.
The Need for a Temporal Approach
Most existing predictive coding models assume that sensory inputs are presented in random batches. However, our visual experience is continuous and dynamic. For example, when we watch a movie, we see a sequence of rapidly changing images. To truly understand how the brain processes these inputs, it is crucial to incorporate the element of time into predictive coding models.
Researchers have developed some algorithms in statistics and machine learning that deal with sequences over time. However, these methods often require complicated computations that may not be feasible for biological Neural Circuits. As a result, they may not accurately represent how our brains process information in real-time.
Introducing Temporal Predictive Coding (tPC)
The proposed tPC model aims to combine the benefits of traditional predictive coding with a focus on time. This model not only predicts current inputs but also forecasts its own future responses based on current sensory information. To achieve this, tPC uses recurrent connections among neurons, which allows predictions from one time step to inform the next.
The tPC model offers several important advantages:
Temporal Predictions: It addresses the problem of predicting future states based on current observations.
Simplicity: It retains the straightforward and biologically plausible structure of static predictive coding, requiring only local connections and simple learning rules.
Efficiency: When the model is linear, it can closely approximate predictions made by established algorithms like the Kalman filter while being computationally cheaper.
Motion Sensitivity: The model develops Gabor-like filters, similar to those found in the visual cortex, which are sensitive to motion.
Nonlinear Case Handling: It can be extended to manage nonlinear tasks effectively, which are common in real-world situations.
The Structure of tPC
To understand tPC, it's essential to look at its underlying structure. The model is conceptualized as a hidden Markov model (HMM). In this setup, there are hidden states that represent the true state of the world and observations that represent what the sensory system perceives. The model assumes that the current state depends only on the previous state and that the current observation is generated based solely on the current state.
This structure reflects the way the brain processes information, simplifying the complexity of sensory inputs into manageable pieces. As sensory observations come in, the tPC model uses its previous estimates to update its understanding of the hidden states.
Learning Mechanism
The learning process in tPC is driven by minimizing prediction errors. The model updates its current estimates based on the difference between the actual observations and those predicted by the model. This process essentially mimics how the brain is thought to learn from experience.
The learning algorithm operates on two fronts: updating the hidden states based on new sensory data and adjusting the synaptic weights that connect neurons. The model assumes that these updates can occur using biologically plausible mechanisms, such as Hebbian plasticity, meaning that connections between neurons strengthen when they are activated together.
Implementation in Neural Circuits
To demonstrate how the tPC model can be realized in biological systems, the researchers propose several neural circuit designs. These circuits can implement the necessary computations and learning rules in a way that aligns with known brain functions.
For instance, one proposed implementation includes neurons that compute prediction errors and relay these signals to other neurons. This setup would allow the circuit to dynamically update its understanding of sensory inputs over time without requiring complex computational resources.
The Role of Time
One of the key innovations in tPC is its ability to factor in the concept of time. Traditional predictive coding models generally treat inputs as static, but tPC incorporates the sequential nature of sensory information. This means that as new information arrives, the model considers both the information from the current moment as well as what it already knows from previous moments.
This temporal aspect is crucial for understanding how dynamic inputs affect perception. The model can react in real time, updating its internal predictions continuously based on incoming sensory data.
Testing and Results
The tPC model was tested through various experiments designed to simulate dynamic sensory inputs. The results indicated that the model performs robustly in filtering tasks while maintaining biological plausibility. Notably, when tPC was trained on natural moving stimuli, it developed receptive fields that were motion-sensitive, mirroring observations made in the visual regions of the brain.
These findings suggest that the tPC model could provide insights into how the brain learns to process dynamic inputs efficiently.
Relationship with Existing Models
The tPC model is closely related to established concepts like the Kalman filter, which is a mathematical method widely used in different fields to estimate the state of a system over time. While tPC shares some similarities with Kalman filtering, it differentiates itself by focusing on the biological feasibility of the processes involved.
Unlike the Kalman filter, which relies on complex matrix operations, tPC is designed to be more adaptable to biological systems. Its learning and updating mechanisms are simpler and more closely reflect the operations of real neural circuits.
Nonlinear Dynamics in tPC
Beyond linear tasks, tPC also shows promise in handling nonlinear dynamics. Many real-world systems, such as the motion of objects or complex sensory inputs, can be better captured through nonlinear models. The ability of tPC to extend its functionality to these more complicated tasks marks a significant step forward in understanding brain processes.
In tests involving nonlinear dynamics, the tPC model outperformed traditional linear models, demonstrating its flexibility and efficiency.
Implications for Cognitive Science
The introduction of temporal predictive coding marks an important advancement in cognitive science. This model provides a framework for studying how the brain processes dynamic stimuli, which is often critical in real-world situations.
By offering insights into the mechanisms behind sensory processing, tPC could shed light on various cognitive functions, including perception, movement, and even learning. This approach may lead to a better understanding of how the brain operates, paving the way for new research directions.
Conclusion
In summary, the temporal predictive coding model presents a promising avenue for understanding the brain's handling of dynamic sensory information. Its ability to learn from prediction errors while incorporating temporal elements allows for a more accurate representation of how we perceive the world around us. This model not only aligns closely with known brain functions but also demonstrates effective performance in complex tasks, highlighting its relevance for cognitive science and neuroscience.
The future of research in this area could potentially bridge the gap between computational theories and biological reality, leading to a deeper understanding of both human and animal cognition. With further exploration and testing, tPC may serve as a fundamental framework for understanding sensory processing and prediction in the brain.
Title: Predictive Coding Networks for Temporal Prediction
Abstract: One of the key problems the brain faces is inferring the state of the world from a sequence of dynamically changing stimuli, and it is not yet clear how the sensory system achieves this task. A well-established computational framework for describing perceptual processes in the brain is provided by the theory of predictive coding. Although the original proposals of predictive coding have discussed temporal prediction, later work developing this theory mostly focused on static stimuli, and key questions on neural implementation and computational properties of temporal predictive coding networks remain open. Here, we address these questions and present a formulation of the temporal predictive coding model that can be naturally implemented in recurrent networks, in which activity dynamics rely only on local inputs to the neurons, and learning only utilises local Hebbian plasticity. Additionally, we show that temporal predictive coding networks can approximate the performance of the Kalman filter in predicting behaviour of linear systems, and behave as a variant of a Kalman filter which does not track its own subjective posterior variance. Importantly, temporal predictive coding networks can achieve similar accuracy as the Kalman filter without performing complex mathematical operations, but just employing simple computations that can be implemented by biological networks. Moreover, when trained with natural dynamic inputs, we found that temporal predictive coding can produce Gabor-like, motion-sensitive receptive fields resembling those observed in real neurons in visual areas. In addition, we demonstrate how the model can be effectively generalized to nonlinear systems. Overall, models presented in this paper show how biologically plausible circuits can predict future stimuli and may guide research on understanding specific neural circuits in brain areas involved in temporal prediction. Author summaryWhile significant advances have been made in the neuroscience of how the brain processes static stimuli, the time dimension has often been relatively neglected. However, time is crucial since the stimuli perceived by our senses typically dynamically vary in time, and the cortex needs to make sense of these changing inputs. This paper describes a computational model of cortical networks processing temporal stimuli. This model is able to infer and track the state of the environment based on noisy inputs, and predict future sensory stimuli. By ensuring that these predictions match the incoming stimuli, the model is able to learn the structure and statistics of its temporal inputs and produces responses of neurons resembling those in the brain. The model may help in further understanding neural circuits in sensory cortical areas.
Authors: Rafal Bogacz, B. Millidge, M. Tang, M. Osanlouy, N. S. Harper
Last Update: 2024-03-09 00:00:00
Language: English
Source URL: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.05.15.540906
Source PDF: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.05.15.540906.full.pdf
Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.
Thank you to biorxiv for use of its open access interoperability.